Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH mountd] filesystem mount options in uci config

2016-06-12 Thread John Crispin
Hi, comment inline. On 10/06/2016 11:18, olivier.hardo...@gmail.com wrote: > Move (previously hardcoded) mount option to UCI to allow different > configuration > like charset (utf-8 or iso) and filesystem driver (if alternative ones are > used). > The fs names are changed in lowercase to compl

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] Pass method paraneter to Lua notifications.

2016-06-12 Thread John Crispin
Hi Ian, there is a typo in the subject and the description of the patch is missing in the body. could you please fix those 2 things and resend the patch ? Johb On 11/06/2016 15:54, Iain Fraser wrote: > --- > lua/ubus.c |5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] tools/mkfwimage2: remove 256 length limit for partition images

2016-06-12 Thread John Crispin
could it be that the subject is wrong s/images/names/ ? John On 11/06/2016 04:15, Alexander Couzens wrote: > Signed-off-by: Alexander Couzens > --- > tools/firmware-utils/src/mkfwimage2.c | 7 ++- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/firmware-util

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] base-files: seed /dev/urandom

2016-06-12 Thread Etienne Champetier
Hi Felix, 2016-06-12 12:45 GMT+02:00 Felix Fietkau : > On 2016-06-11 08:37, Etienne CHAMPETIER wrote: >> This commit: >> 1) seed /dev/urandom with a saved seed as early as possible >>(using /lib/preinit/81_urandom_seed) >> 2) save a new seed using getrandom() so we are sure /dev/urandom >>

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v2] base-files: seed /dev/urandom

2016-06-12 Thread Etienne CHAMPETIER
This commit: 1) seed /dev/urandom with a saved seed as early as possible (using /lib/preinit/81_urandom_seed) 2) save a new seed using getrandom() so we are sure /dev/urandom pool is initialized (using /etc/init.d/urandom_seed) seed size is 512 bytes (ie /proc/sys/kernel/random/poolsize / 8)

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] openvpn: update to 2.3.11

2016-06-12 Thread Magnus Kroken
Security fixes: * Fixed port-share bug with DoS potential * Fix buffer overflow by user supplied data Full changelog: https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/wiki/ChangesInOpenvpn23#OpenVPN2.3.11 Signed-off-by: Magnus Kroken --- package/network/services/openvpn/Makefile | 6 +++--- ..

Re: [LEDE-DEV] lede integration issues remaining from the detrius of cerowrt

2016-06-12 Thread L. D. Pinney
Much like the convention of prefixing your subject line with [PATCH] messages like this should be required to have a prefix such as [DRIVEL] for effective filtering lede integration issues ?? I don't see why there IS an issue CeroWrt died for good reason(s) ... such as : Low return on investment

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] ar71xx: mach-ubnt-xm.c convert patches to mach file

2016-06-12 Thread Arne Zachlod
Signed-off-by: Arne Zachlod --- .../ar71xx/files/arch/mips/ath79/mach-ubnt-xm.c| 700 + .../patches-4.4/607-MIPS-ath79-ubnt-xm-fixes.patch | 89 --- .../608-MIPS-ath79-ubnt-xm-add-more-boards.patch | 623 +- ...IPS-ath79-UBNT-add-airGateway-pro-support.p

Re: [LEDE-DEV] lede integration issues remaining from the detrius of cerowrt

2016-06-12 Thread Dave Taht
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Daniel Curran-Dickinson wrote: > Hi Dave, > > I don't speak for the LEDE team, but it looks to me a lot of your > problem is that you are using LEDE/openwrt for far bigger iron than the > primary target (standard routers, including pre-AC non-NAND ones, which > ar

Re: [LEDE-DEV] lede integration issues remaining from the detrius of cerowrt

2016-06-12 Thread Lars Kruse
Hi Dave, Am Sun, 12 Jun 2016 08:23:04 -0700 schrieb Dave Taht : > Groovy. There are quite a few other devices that have POE (edgerouter > is the first that comes to mind), perhaps this can be built on > generically? here should be the proper place (it was changed after my patch): https://git.

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [Cerowrt-devel] lede integration issues remaining from the detrius of cerowrt

2016-06-12 Thread Dave Taht
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 1:06 AM, Alan Jenkins wrote: > On 11/06/16 18:44, Dave Taht wrote: >> >> happy to see cake working today! thx all! >> >> In https://github.com/dtaht/ceropackages-3.10: >> The principal problem with fdisk nowadays is that very large (> 2TB, I >> think) devices are not suppor

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Nand flash partitions

2016-06-12 Thread Daniel Golle
Hi Hauke, On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 03:23:58PM +0200, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > I work on creating an OpenWrt image which I can just flash over an UGW > (Lantiq's/Intel's OpenWrt distribution) distribution with the normal > U-Boot. Then you do not have to touch the bootloader or the fl

Re: [LEDE-DEV] lede integration issues remaining from the detrius of cerowrt

2016-06-12 Thread Dave Taht
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Lars Kruse wrote: > Hi Dave, > >> D) https://github.com/dtaht/ceropackages-3.10/tree/master/utils/nanom5poe >> >> I don't know what landed upstream to control poe for the nano-m5 >> radios, if anything? > > I submitted a patch (that was accepted) for GPIO-based POE

[LEDE-DEV] Nand flash partitions

2016-06-12 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
Hi Daniel, I work on creating an OpenWrt image which I can just flash over an UGW (Lantiq's/Intel's OpenWrt distribution) distribution with the normal U-Boot. Then you do not have to touch the bootloader or the flash layout and can just run OpenWrt. UGW is mostly focused on NAND flash based device

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] base-files: seed /dev/urandom

2016-06-12 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2016-06-11 08:37, Etienne CHAMPETIER wrote: > This commit: > 1) seed /dev/urandom with a saved seed as early as possible >(using /lib/preinit/81_urandom_seed) > 2) save a new seed using getrandom() so we are sure /dev/urandom >pool is initialized (using /etc/init.d/urandom_seed) > > see

Re: [LEDE-DEV] lede integration issues remaining from the detrius of cerowrt

2016-06-12 Thread Dirk Neukirchen
On 11.06.2016 19:44, Dave Taht wrote: > E) https://github.com/dtaht/ceropackages-3.10/tree/master/utils/gdisk > > The principal problem with fdisk nowadays is that very large (> 2TB, I > think) devices are not supported by it, and require a GPT capable > tool. Is there a replacement in lede that h

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [Cerowrt-devel] lede integration issues remaining from the detrius of cerowrt

2016-06-12 Thread Alan Jenkins
On 11/06/16 18:44, Dave Taht wrote: happy to see cake working today! thx all! In https://github.com/dtaht/ceropackages-3.10: The principal problem with fdisk nowadays is that very large (> 2TB, I think) devices are not supported by it, and require a GPT capable tool. Is there a replacement in le