On 09/06/2016 23:36, Drew from NixCore wrote:
> I have no problem with a common dtsi, can I get these changes in first
> and then do the dtsi as I continue work?
>
> Drew
>
> On 06/09/2016 03:12 PM, Karl Palsson wrote:
>> If the 8 and 16 meg files only differ in their memory, should
>> they per
Just like https://dev.openwrt.org/timeline
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
I have no problem with a common dtsi, can I get these changes in first
and then do the dtsi as I continue work?
Drew
On 06/09/2016 03:12 PM, Karl Palsson wrote:
If the 8 and 16 meg files only differ in their memory, should
they perhaps just have a common .dtsi file for them both? instead
of du
If the 8 and 16 meg files only differ in their memory, should
they perhaps just have a common .dtsi file for them both? instead
of duplicating the entire dts? I've snipped the only differences
between them below...
Sincerely,
Karl P
Drew from NixCore wrote:
> Added NixCore X1 ramips target htt
Added NixCore X1 ramips target http://nixcores.com. This builds 8M and
16M images. V3 updates the dts to support LEDE updated format
Signed-off-by: Drew Gaylo
diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network
b/target/linux/ramips/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network
index 4728
Hi,
I'm posting the results of a small group who talked about the
sysupgrade image format at the battlemesh in Porto.
sysupgrade
##
* don't limit our format by vendor image limitations
* should contain meta information
* meta data like compatible boards, lede version, ..
* meta data g
its a vm that takes a few moments to get the real time hen coming out of
sleep ;)
On 09/06/2016 17:02, Etienne Champetier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Everything is fine except your computer clock ;)
> ubox commit:
> authorEtienne CHAMPETIER
> Thu, 9 Jun 2016 16:03:00 +0300 (13:03 +)
> committe
Hi,
Everything is fine except your computer clock ;)
ubox commit:
authorEtienne CHAMPETIER
Thu, 9 Jun 2016 16:03:00 +0300 (13:03 +)
committerJohn Crispin
Wed, 8 Jun 2016 01:19:24 +0300 (00:19 +0200)
staging commit:
authorJohn Crispin
Wed, 8 Jun 2016 01:22:16 +0300 (
Hi Etienne,
pushed the patch to ubox.git and updated the ubox package inside my
staging tree. should the tool be installed to /usr/bin ? if not let me
know and i will fix the staged commit.
John
On 09/06/2016 15:03, Etienne CHAMPETIER wrote:
> getrandom() was introduced in version 3.17 o
On 08/06/2016 15:49, Michał Osowiecki wrote:
> Cisco RV0XX u-boot sets MEM=2048 as boot param. We assume that at least
> 4MB (mem_alloc_size) of ram is needed to run linux on cavium boards, so
> if mem < 4M - ignore it and set default value
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Michał Osowiecki
>
Hi Michał,
getrandom() was introduced in version 3.17 of the Linux kernel.
By default getrandom() block until /dev/urandom pool has been initialized
and then read from it.
Read buffer is 256 bytes so getrandom() calls always succeed.
First usage will be to save a seed for /dev/urandom.
Signed-off-by: Etienn
Even though ARC tools were released as arc-2016.03
we have a little bit different version name for GDB.
That's because both Binutils and GDB come from the same
git repo but from different branches (and so different tags).
Also removing an extra patch that made its way into release.
Signed-off-by:
On 2016-06-08 23:43, Xinxing Hu wrote:
Hi Yousong,
Thanks a lot for you patch. I tried it a little bit, and till now
everything looks OK. It seems this issue is solved by your patch.
Not sure whether Mats (the original reporter of this issue) still see
the issue or not.
Unfortunately I hav
13 matches
Mail list logo