Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] [ramips] Added NixCore X1 target V3

2016-06-09 Thread John Crispin
On 09/06/2016 23:36, Drew from NixCore wrote: > I have no problem with a common dtsi, can I get these changes in first > and then do the dtsi as I continue work? > > Drew > > On 06/09/2016 03:12 PM, Karl Palsson wrote: >> If the 8 and 16 meg files only differ in their memory, should >> they per

[LEDE-DEV] Do we have a timeline of somethings else.

2016-06-09 Thread xinglp
Just like https://dev.openwrt.org/timeline ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] [ramips] Added NixCore X1 target V3

2016-06-09 Thread Drew from NixCore
I have no problem with a common dtsi, can I get these changes in first and then do the dtsi as I continue work? Drew On 06/09/2016 03:12 PM, Karl Palsson wrote: If the 8 and 16 meg files only differ in their memory, should they perhaps just have a common .dtsi file for them both? instead of du

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] [ramips] Added NixCore X1 target V3

2016-06-09 Thread Karl Palsson
If the 8 and 16 meg files only differ in their memory, should they perhaps just have a common .dtsi file for them both? instead of duplicating the entire dts? I've snipped the only differences between them below... Sincerely, Karl P Drew from NixCore wrote: > Added NixCore X1 ramips target htt

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] [ramips] Added NixCore X1 target V3

2016-06-09 Thread Drew from NixCore
Added NixCore X1 ramips target http://nixcores.com. This builds 8M and 16M images. V3 updates the dts to support LEDE updated format Signed-off-by: Drew Gaylo diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network b/target/linux/ramips/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network index 4728

[LEDE-DEV] [RFC] sysupgrade image format

2016-06-09 Thread Alexander Couzens
Hi, I'm posting the results of a small group who talked about the sysupgrade image format at the battlemesh in Porto. sysupgrade ## * don't limit our format by vendor image limitations * should contain meta information * meta data like compatible boards, lede version, .. * meta data g

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH ubox] getrandom: add helper for getrandom() syscall

2016-06-09 Thread John Crispin
its a vm that takes a few moments to get the real time hen coming out of sleep ;) On 09/06/2016 17:02, Etienne Champetier wrote: > Hi, > > Everything is fine except your computer clock ;) > ubox commit: > authorEtienne CHAMPETIER > Thu, 9 Jun 2016 16:03:00 +0300 (13:03 +) > committe

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH ubox] getrandom: add helper for getrandom() syscall

2016-06-09 Thread Etienne Champetier
Hi, Everything is fine except your computer clock ;) ubox commit: authorEtienne CHAMPETIER Thu, 9 Jun 2016 16:03:00 +0300 (13:03 +) committerJohn Crispin Wed, 8 Jun 2016 01:19:24 +0300 (00:19 +0200) staging commit: authorJohn Crispin Wed, 8 Jun 2016 01:22:16 +0300 (

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH ubox] getrandom: add helper for getrandom() syscall

2016-06-09 Thread John Crispin
Hi Etienne, pushed the patch to ubox.git and updated the ubox package inside my staging tree. should the tool be installed to /usr/bin ? if not let me know and i will fix the staged commit. John On 09/06/2016 15:03, Etienne CHAMPETIER wrote: > getrandom() was introduced in version 3.17 o

Re: [LEDE-DEV] cavium: Ignore MEM boot param when too small

2016-06-09 Thread John Crispin
On 08/06/2016 15:49, Michał Osowiecki wrote: > Cisco RV0XX u-boot sets MEM=2048 as boot param. We assume that at least > 4MB (mem_alloc_size) of ram is needed to run linux on cavium boards, so > if mem < 4M - ignore it and set default value > > > Signed-off-by: Michał Osowiecki > Hi Michał,

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH ubox] getrandom: add helper for getrandom() syscall

2016-06-09 Thread Etienne CHAMPETIER
getrandom() was introduced in version 3.17 of the Linux kernel. By default getrandom() block until /dev/urandom pool has been initialized and then read from it. Read buffer is 256 bytes so getrandom() calls always succeed. First usage will be to save a seed for /dev/urandom. Signed-off-by: Etienn

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] toolchain/gdb: Use correct folder name for ARC patches

2016-06-09 Thread Alexey Brodkin
Even though ARC tools were released as arc-2016.03 we have a little bit different version name for GDB. That's because both Binutils and GDB come from the same git repo but from different branches (and so different tags). Also removing an extra patch that made its way into release. Signed-off-by:

Re: [LEDE-DEV] libubox, procd: init process hangs

2016-06-09 Thread Mats Karrman
On 2016-06-08 23:43, Xinxing Hu wrote: Hi Yousong, Thanks a lot for you patch. I tried it a little bit, and till now everything looks OK. It seems this issue is solved by your patch. Not sure whether Mats (the original reporter of this issue) still see the issue or not. Unfortunately I hav