On 10/5/07, John vd Waeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Beginner in Lazarus, experience in Delphi since 1.0
>
> Installed snapshot 20071005 on winXP.
>
> Open Compiler Options, click on tab Messages
> A lot of jittering on the tab and then:
> Unknow RT Error 202 OK to ignore, Cancel
Confirmed on Win32 (XP) with SVN 12712.
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
BTW, reported in the bug tracker as #10104
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Wow, that was fast. ;-)
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Do you mean the actual SVN or my Patch?
I tested my patch against a small test project (Prj + 2 units + 1 include file).
The only TODO's that don't make it in the list are the ones in the .inc file.
Regards,
Gerard.
_
To unsubs
I think it doesn't load the includes because it parses the include
file name, but passes it as it is without path to the loading routine,
so the file cannot be loaded.
Any idea where I can get the current project path?
Regards,
Gerard.
Hi,
> 1. Can you create a patch? See
> http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Creating_A_Patch
>
Sure.
> 2. Don't use implementation uses sections in the IDE.
>
Ok.
> 3. Don't load source files from disk. Always use
>
> CodeToolBoss.LoadFile(CleanAndExpandFilename(Filename),true,false).
>
Ok, I'll c
Hi Graeme,
> OK, so here is my wish list which should make it useful for me.
>
> * Search the current open projects source, including .inc files
>for ToDo, TODO, #todo tags. It must support multiple tag formats
>and maybe have a developer pick their preferred format (see later why)
Works
Hi Mattias,
> So forget for a moment the existing implementation and write what a good
> ToDo List dialog should do.
>
See my replies to Graeme wish list, I think it covers pretty much what
a Todo List should do.
I'm not sure what the scope of the list should be, but I think there
should be an op
Mattias,
Is there a way to discriminate between used units on a package basis?
If so, one UI solution could be to put a small treeview on the left of
the list form, with a source code structure like:
+- MyProject.lpi
|
+- MyUnit1.pas
+- MyUnit2.pas
+- LCL
+- FCL
With the current projec
See attached image for and idea of what I mean
<>
Hi all,
Can you tell me what is the current status of visual form inheritance?
Is there somebody working on it?
Is there any bounty for it? (I can't see any in
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Bounties)
Best regards,
Gerard.
_
Hi Mattias,
> It's basically working.
Cool.
> Missing features:
> - When descendant and ancestor forms are designed at the same time in
> the IDE and ancestor is changed: apply changes to descendants
Would be nice, but for the moment I can live without that. If closing
the descendants and reopen
Congratulations, it's major step forward.
Regards,
Gerard.
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
You had me looking at it, thou.
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Excellent work, Laurent!
On Dec 6, 2007 8:13 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The "Edit" menu is already over populated and is very long,
Indeed.
My proposal:
In the main menu:
Edit | Insert | GUID
In the editor window popup menu:
Make a 'Insert' submenu, move 'Todo Item' under this submenu, and
I like the first, but I the third is more Delphi-like and it would probably
be easier to sport for people coming from Delphi.
Hi Graeme,
are you aware of the licensing issues?
See:
http://blogs.msdn.com/jensenh/archive/2006/11/21/licensing-the-2007-microsoft-office-user-interface.aspx
and
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/office/aa973809.aspx
It seems that they changed their mind and now it's royalty free but you
still
Hi all,
I am writing a little app with Lazarus (SVN 13389) wich has two toolbars
with several buttons each.
There is an action list with some actions assinged to toolbar buttons, some
to main menu items, and some to both.
I droped a TImageList, added some 16X16 pixels bitmaps with a fuchsia
backgr
Sorry, I forgot to add:
- Win Xp Pro.
- NVidia GForce 5200
- 1024 X 768, 32 bits
If I run project1, the images are displayed Ok, even if I add the ones that
I used in my own project.
Hi Graeme,
I think I was the last to work on the TODO list.
And even if it may sound as a typical programmer excuse, last time I checked
it used to work. ;-)
You are right, it was working not so long ago, and I checked with 13776
under windows and it doesn't process the TODO entries you submitted.
It seems it doens't even reach that method as it should in the loop from
line 570 to 586.
It seems that the function BasicCodeTools.FindNextComment used to get the
comments ignores any comment that starts with '{' not immediatly followed by
a '$' ?
Amazing! Is there a chance that we can see this as an option for the IDE?
Regards,
Gerard.
>
> For the word "Identifier", it seems "Identifiant" would be more
> appropriated, rather than "Identificateur". Other colleagues of mine
> conform it. In fact "Identificateur" is not the good word, like
> "Programmateur" instead of "Programmeur" for a programer.
I think "identificateur" is righ
Great. There are times where having everything docked together is much more
convenient.
This function (FindNextComment) is only used in
TStandardCodeTool.GetPasDocComments and TodoList. I don't think changing
it's behaviour would break anything.
The fix is as easy as removing the check for the dollar char.
at line 1137:
'{': Exit;
{ if (Result
None of the todo items you submitted follows in the syntax expected by the
parser as it is now.
It's either:
{TODO: x } or {DONE: x }
or
{#todo: xxx xx xx} or {#done: xxx xx xx} or
Optionally, you can add -oX for the owner and -cX for the category.
Regards,
Gerard.
On Jan 16, 2008 6:30 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I normally do the above (Delphi style), but I saw the entries in the
> todo list dialog, so thought maybe the todo comments format has
> changed. I saw the other formats in the todolist.pas unit's header. I
> tried those form
Is anybody able to reach http://lazarus.freepascal.org?
I get a timeout after the address is resolved.
Thanks,
Gerard.
On Jan 18, 2008 8:46 AM, Dave Coventry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, it was licensing issues that brought me away from Delphi.
>
> I have Delphi 3 Standard and I still code with it, I never upgraded to
> 4 because it had a bad re tion, when 5 came out they had changed
> the license so that yo
I added two reports with patches in the bug tracker, both for the parsing
issue (10650) and the comment (10651).
I just read Dephi 7 Pro (I don't have earlier versions installed anymore)
license.txt and deploy.txt and it says I can freely distribute my compiled
apps, along with some Borland binary files (runtime packages, BDE, Active X
Controls)
The only restrictions are for some of the runtime packages (Main
On Jan 18, 2008 10:21 AM, Dave Coventry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is that the Standard Edition?
No, it's the Professional edition.
>
> I have the Delphi 3 Standard Edition which allows me to distribute apps.
>
> I believe that subsequent Upgrades split into 'Standard Edition' and
> 'Enterpr
Great, thanks.
Looks nice, congrats.
Gerard.
38 matches
Mail list logo