Flávio Etrusco wrote:
> On 11/27/06, Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Question:
> >
> > Using [ form2.parent:=form1; ] attaches form2 to form1 in-process.
> >
> > What is needed to attach TControl.Parent to an out of process window?
>
> IIRC
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 12/2/06, Dean Zobec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > see with an accounting program is the fact that at lower level it has to
> > couple with different laws and forms of taxation, so the greatest work
> > is to build a flexible system that can be easily adopted to the si
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 12/3/06, Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Design Patterns won't help you introduce flexibility, they only help you
> > put structure into your design. So the key here is abstraction rather
> > than patterns. TObject is a great
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> > But still, your examples are great; can you give some links?
> >
> > > Iterator, Visitor, Composite, Factory Method, Singleton and many
> > > more... Mediator and Observer:
>
> Code for tiOPF:
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/tiopf
> Model-GUI-Mediator code:
> As a
Marc Weustink wrote:
> Al Boldi wrote:
> > Marc Weustink wrote:
> >> Al Boldi wrote:
> >>> Question:
> >>>
> >>> Using [ form2.parent:=form1; ] attaches form2 to form1 in-process.
> >>>
> >>> What is needed to attach
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Kris Leech wrote:
> > PS. How come we can reply to the Lazarus mailing list using email, but
> > not the FPC mailing list... Are they on different systems?
>
> They are.
> But why wouldn't you be able to reply to the FPC mailing list using email
> ?
Unit testing is really important, but also tedious. To ease TTestCase and
TAssert creation, is there a generator that implements TTestCase for some
TObject, by default bounds-testing based on public/published properties?
Thanks!
--
Al
Adrian Maier wrote:
> On 12/11/06, Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > George Birbilis schreef:
> > >> All this is possible, but IMHO it is nonsense to put effort
> > >> into creating such a snapshot.
> > >>
> > >> I think there is some intelligence test, test if people
> > >> persevere
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> ModelMaker is a brilliant tool and well worth learning. I just don't
> think is supports include files though. Then again, i don't know of
> any other UML tool that does either...
>
> Anyway, here is a few more...
>
> http://argouml.tigris.org/
> http://www.gentleware.c
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> > > ModelMaker is a brilliant tool and well worth learning. I just
> > > don't think is supports include files though. Then again, i don't
> &
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:51:48 +0300
>
> Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> > > Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> > > > > ModelMaker is a
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> > > Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> > > > > Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
Lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to write a TCP server with synapse blocking sockets.
>
> I created a TThread decendent class to listen for incoming requests and
> it works ok, except it looks like it executes in the main thread because
>the console no longer responds when my class is executed a
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Can you be more specific? What is ChildClass?
> > > > > I would expect a function to scan the classes of the project or
> > > > > a package. For example:
>
Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
> Kris Leech wrote:
> > Good stuff, did you come across any issues with simpleIPC, Ive been
> > meaning to have a go with it for a while...
>
> I had two issues with simpleipc:
> - in unix the TSimpleIPCServer.OnMessage event is not fired. To
> override this, a s
Nataraj S Narayan wrote:
>
> Is anybody using actual object model in Lazarus ? I mean, classes for
> say 'Purchase Orders' - which will have the modules for persistance like
> TQuery /TTable ,defined inside the PO class?
>
> I hear that biggest issue is to map object model to relational model.
> Wh
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 1/13/07, Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you are verse in OOP, there is really no need for an OPF, as an OPF
> > only aids you in plumbing up your classes, while limiting you to the
> > extent of the specific BusinessObject.
>
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 1/13/07, Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > OPF is really meant as a glue between OOP and the DBMS, to yield an
> > ODBMS interface on the client side, for seamless OOP to DBMS
> > integration. This may save you some coding, but o
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 1/15/07, Graeme Geldenhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > For my implementation which rather uses RTTI to set and get Object
> > property values have a look at:
> > http://tinyurl.com/y5akb5
> >
> > and the following units.
> > tiGenericEditMediators.pas
> > tiGe
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 1/15/07, Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >4. *Tight coupling to a data access API.* The BDE allows us to swap
> > > aliases when you want to change databases, but what if you want to
> > > switch from BDE data acce
Helmut Hartl wrote:
> Also we are a very small team developing Zeos at the moment -
> so if someone is interested to team up and help us - you are welcome.
Any documentation available?
Or even a simple README, describing project approach and goal?
Thanks!
--
Al
___
Algis Kabaila wrote:
>
> 2. My personal experience and details. I will simply say here that I am a
> really old man - I will be 82 in a few weeks time.
When did you start programming?
What languages did you use?
Which one is the best?
How does OOP affect development (pros/cons)?
Is there a better
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 1/15/07, Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > It is very easy to change to any TObject
> > > descendant class that as RTTI enabled and a simple implementation of
> > > the Observer pattern. MGM is a compound pattern base
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 1/16/07, Joost van der Sluis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've been thinkink about using tiOPF for a project at work. But for that
> > I have to change it so that it can use SQLDB. That can't be that hard,
> > so maybe I\m gonna help you there.
>
> I've already writt
Tiziano_mk wrote:
> I wish to add this missing item that i find more interesting:
>
> "Maybe you want to use python to control OpenOffice with Free pascal?"
> It's possible, just embed FPC with the python "embedded" in OpenOffice.
>
> During holydays I made successfully this test (on windows) and I
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> > > There is too few information on that functions... sometime
> > > programming with lazarus i feel blind.
> > >
> > > Where can i found a manual with all Lazarus functions, and where
> > > can i search if i don't find anything there?
> >
> > This manual does not yet exis
Does your program work without threads?
If it does, make sure you call TThread.Synchronize(SyncMethod) when
necessary.
Thanks!
--
Al
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi
>
> if i want to use this strings
>
> tablo.ExecSQL( 'select type_name from servers where id='+
> inttostr( record_id) );
> type_
Vincent Snijders wrote:
> Mattias Gaertner schreef:
> > On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 19:42:32 +0100
> >
> > Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> There is
> >> http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=92177&package_id=
> >>138755
> >
> > It seems to be quite old: 2005-05-26.
>
> A ne
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> Can TStringGrid handle 30.000 rows?
> Because this is easily created by compiling with -vt and TListBox can
> not handle it fast enough.
I noticed this too. So I added a TMemo to the Messages window with a
TSplitter. TMemo is then updated with the full (including hidde
Vincent Snijders wrote:
> Al Boldi schreef:
> > The only missing thing is probably code examples. It maybe a good idea
> > to add a link after the code-help description, to either see an example,
> > or add one thru the wiki or by email.
> >
> > BTW, I could only
TThread.Create and TThread.Synchronize example:
Under UNIX compile with -dUseCThreads.
interface
[...]
{ TMyThread }
TMyThread=class(TThread)
procedure Execute; override;
procedure UpdateGUI;
end;
var
Form1: TForm1;
MyThread1:TMyThread;
i:integer;
implementation
{ TMyThr
Jesus Reyes wrote:
> --- Mattias Gaertner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribiَ:
> > Can TStringGrid handle 30.000 rows?
> > Because this is easily created by compiling with -vt and TListBox
> > can not handle it fast enough.
>
> I think it can do it, though, atm it's not optimized to handle very
> huge num
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> TListBox speed depends on the widgetset implementation, so it's speed
> is always limited.
> The best speed you get by not talking to external libs. ;)
I just tried TListView and it's super fast: 100k rows in 1.5 sec
But it's really slow when free'ing the list.
Thanks!
Jesus Reyes wrote:
> That means that we already have all those strings in some other place
> and only some strings are sent to the listbox?
Yes.
> in this case another approach could be made, a
> drawgrid with custom scrollbar handling could do it.
>
> If the TreeView solution is not implemented
Vincent Snijders wrote:
> Jesus Reyes schreef:
> > --- Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribiَ:
> >> TListBox: 10k rows in 73sec
> >> TTreeView: 100k rows in 50sec
> >> TMemo: 100k rows in 30sec
> >> TListView: 100k rows in 1.5sec
&g
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Vincent Snijders wrote:
> > > Jesus Reyes schreef:
> > > > --- Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribiظژ:
> > > >> TListBox: 10k rows in 73sec
> > > >>
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > >> TListBox: 10k rows in 73sec
> > > > > >> TTreeView: 100k rows in 50sec
> > > > > >> TMemo: 100k rows in 30sec
> > > >
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Preallocating the tree in TTreeView could improve its speed a lot.
> > >
> > > I doubt that. It already works with exponential growth.
> >
> > Preallocate in 16sec ==
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> > > Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > Preallocating the tree in TTreeView could improve its speed a
> > > > > > lot.
> >
Andrea Mauri wrote:
> My "problem" is, I have a big project, with many units, I make a lot of
> modifications daily, I want to test if everything works as I want, so I
> compile my project many times in a day.
> I don't want that lazarus saves my project every time I compile it and I
> don't want
于野 wrote:
> I'm a Chinese OIer(which is short for someone who has intersts in
> 'Olympiad in Informatics'). Now I'm using Lazarus to debug. but every time
> when I want to know how much time it spend during the program runs, I have
> to add something like this: var ta,tb:Tsystemtime;
> begin
> da
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 于野 wrote:
> > > I'm a Chinese OIer(which is short for someone who has intersts in
> > > 'Olympiad in Informatics'). Now I'm using Lazarus to debug. but
> > > ev
Vincent Snijders wrote:
> Kris Leech schreef:
> > Ger Remmers wrote:
> >> Select some text (plain ascii) in a mail message (Kmail) or a news post
> >> (Knode) and copy it (CTRL-C or CTRL-Ins). Switch to Lazarus Editor
> >> Window and
> >> right-click. In the menu select Paste. Nothing visual happen
Vincent Snijders wrote:
> Al Boldi schreef:
> > Vincent Snijders wrote:
> >> Kris Leech schreef:
> >>> Ger Remmers wrote:
> >>>> Select some text (plain ascii) in a mail message (Kmail) or a news
> >>>> post (Knode) and copy it (CTR
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> I started implementing this on LCLIntf, but I am having a lot of
> trouble with type declarations. AllocateHWnd needs a parameter of type
> TWndProc = procedure (var Message: TLMessage) of object;
>
> But TWndProc is declared on controls, and no basic lcl unit u
Sebastian Kraft wrote:
> I looked through fpc docs and found the function BeginThread( func) to
> execute the function func as a seperate thread.
>
> What are the (dis)advantages of this very easy usage compared to creating
> a TThread class?
TThread is an oop-wrapper for BeginThread, and binds he
Bram Kuijvenhoven wrote:
> If Exit is a variable or field in the local scope, you actually get the
> 'illegal expression' error.
But, it should at least give you a warning at the overriding variable then?
Thanks!
--
Al
_
To u
Antonio Sanguigni wrote:
> And, broadly speaking, it is not a good practice modifying an ancestor to
> suite these needs.
Yes, as this would probably require a recompile of the ancestor.
But, why is it not possible to override the ancestor?
Thanks!
--
Al
__
Marco van de Voort wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 01:58:56PM +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
> > Antonio Sanguigni wrote:
> > > And, broadly speaking, it is not a good practice modifying an ancestor
> > > to suite these needs.
> >
> > Yes, as this would proba
Marco van de Voort wrote:
> > Marco van de Voort wrote:
> > > (reserved in the VMT by the virtual directive), it doesn't create
> > > room.
> > >
> > > This is also why you can't override non virtual methods.
> >
> > Thanks for this very clear and to the point answer.
> >
> > Would it be possible t
Marco van de Voort wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 07:15:41AM +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
> > > > > (reserved in the VMT by the virtual directive), it doesn't create
> > > > > room.
> > > > >
> > > > > This is also why you can't
Sergei Gorelkin wrote:
> And there are tons of similar issues, which make any fpGUI app feel
> extermely alien in Windows. As a programmer, I can say that fixing
> such issues is actually a much harder and boring job than what you
> had already done.
Agreed.
> Nevertheless, you are on a really go
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> On 4/3/07, Mattias Gaertner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can someone give a short example or point me to the right mail, where
> > AllocateHWnd is needed and why it must be implemented in all LCL
> > interfaces instead of the LCL?
>
> At some point I thougth a
Cesar Romero wrote:
> Im already using here, dispite any other opinion, D4PHP is a very
> productive tool.
Pieter Valentijn wrote:
> I just Bouth it as well.
> Even do its class herachie is not optimal it's mutch beter than notepad
It sure is!
But the real question is:
How difficult would it be
Luca Olivetti wrote:
> I wasn't actually interested in updating the counter, it was just a test
> to see if while I was sleeping ;-) the LCL became automagically thread
> safe :-D [*] (I still remember the shock when I wrote my first delphi
> 2.0 heavily multithreaded application only to discover
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has anybody done something like this with CodeTools yet? Creating a
> GUI Lazarus addon or seperate application that can build or edit
> classes?
Great idea!
> I would like to build such a tool or help someone that already started
> with such a tool. This would
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 15/06/07, Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A good starting point would probably be a DBTable-To-Class importer.
>
> tiOPF already has something link this - well kinda. The tool is called
> tiSQLEditor. You write and execute you S
Cesar Romero wrote:
> >> And why do you think a form.OnCreate would fire at the right moment ?
> >
> > Well, using embedded forms at runtime... you create the form when you
> > need the form. At which point the OnCreate fires. Frames are meant
> > for usage at design time, so you have no control a
Al Boldi wrote:
> Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> > On Sun, 4 Jun 2006, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> > > Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> > > > > Al Boldi wrote:
> > > > > > The SourceEditor cu
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What are the pros and cons for letting the form designer add code
> inside the .pas unit instead of a separate .lfm file?
>
> For example:
> Lazarus and Delphi uses external files (.lfm and .dfm) to save
> information about forms designed using the form designer
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2007, Al Boldi wrote:
> > Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> > > So again, what is the pros and cons between the two design choices
> > > when using the Object Pascal language?
> >
> > .dfm is good for beginners, who g
Giuliano Colla wrote:
> The configure build lazarus IDE provides a lot of options which the
> majority of us don't use, but we're however forced to check/uncheck.
>
> Therefore I've added a small Group Box, named "Quick Configure Options"
> with thre buttons: All, LCL, and Custom. The first two cov
Mattias Gärtner wrote:
> Zitat von Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Giuliano Colla wrote:
> > > The configure build lazarus IDE provides a lot of options which the
> > > majority of us don't use, but we're however forced to check/uncheck.
> > >
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2007, Al Boldi wrote:
> > This really has nothing to do with resources. Resources should still be
> > saved in its own .res file.
>
> Forms are stored in resources. A dfm is changed to resource and then
> compiled in the binary ?
Mattias Gärtner wrote:
> Zitat von Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> > > On Mon, 23 Jul 2007, Al Boldi wrote:
> > > > Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> > > > > So again, what is the pros and cons between the two design choi
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 25/07/07, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > All in all I think it would be better to have a PageControl with 2 tabs
> > "Quick build" and "Custom". It's cleaner and more conform the other
> > dialogs in the IDE. The jumping of the buttons is weird and
Mattias Gärtner wrote:
> Zitat von Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> > > On 25/07/07, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > All in all I think it would be better to have a PageControl with 2
> > > >
Giuliano Colla wrote:
> Graeme Geldenhuys ha scritto:
> > On 25/07/07, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> All in all I think it would be better to have a PageControl with 2 tabs
> >> "Quick build" and "Custom". It's cleaner and more conform the other
> >> dialogs in the IDE. The ju
I have the sources of FPC/Laz up and running on linux, and now I want to
compile them on windows. Do I need to download the sources again, or is
there a platform specific tools package that allows me to recompile with the
same sources?
Thanks!
--
Al
_
Giuliano Colla wrote:
> Al Boldi ha scritto:
> > I have the sources of FPC/Laz up and running on linux, and now I want to
> > compile them on windows. Do I need to download the sources again, or is
> > there a platform specific tools package that allows me to recompile with
Well, I guess the screenshot was too big (87KB), so here is the text only.
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> Hi Victor,
>
> Could you explain how you managed the MDI look? Where the editor
> (synedit) gets created? I use the Toolbar Editor add-on package which
> creates a panel
Víctor R. Ruiz wrote:
> Hi:
Hi
> 2007/9/12, Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I once posted "A Studio IDE layout", which worked by re-parenting the
> > ide windows inside a TStudio form. This meant that it did not require
> > any changes to the ori
Joao Morais wrote:
> I am currently working in an IO-like project with a smarter, faster and
> more customizable OPF engine, decoupled frameworks (after all data type
> and opf aren't the same thing), no dbware or tdataset dependency, and
> the best item: no backward compatibility to bother. www.pr
Joao Morais wrote:
> Al Boldi wrote:
> > Joao Morais wrote:
> >> I am currently working in an IO-like project with a smarter, faster and
> >> more customizable OPF engine, decoupled frameworks (after all data type
> >> and opf aren't the same thing), no db
Joao Morais wrote:
> Al Boldi wrote:
> > You see, trying to create an OPF as a separate layer that
> > connects to the db via a broker is just broken by design, as this will
> > introduce a tremendous overhead due to the dual caching problem.
>
> I agree with you that th
Joao Morais wrote:
> Al Boldi wrote:
> >> A small overhead do exist actually,
> >
> > I don't think it's small, unless you mean small apps which deal with
> > textual data only. For large apps that deal with blobs, the overhead may
> > bring do
Joao Morais wrote:
> Al Boldi wrote:
> > Where is the data cached?
>
> Attributes belong to business objects. BOs are reference counted and the
> ones that wasn't removed from the memory are referenced by a cache that
> belongs to the persistence service.
Sounds g
Joao Morais wrote:
> Al Boldi wrote:
> > Of course you are not caching any relational data, but you said that you
> > are using a connection broker to the rdb, which caches the rdb data,
> > which means extra overhead.
>
> Hmmm... the rdb or the suite that access the rdb
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 10/11/2007, Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > You don't need to do this. Eg: create a form without code or
> > > non-visual components, bind BO attributes and components in a single
> > > line, and the MVP will do the
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> I think ParentWindow is very widgetset specific (see below). Probably
> it will work cross platform very limited. See at end for an
> alternative solution.
>
> - AFAIK under winapi you can stack handles even of different processes.
> gtk does not allow this. I don't know a
Joao Morais wrote:
> Al Boldi wrote:
> > Oh, I meant the OPF design. Is it possible to isolate the OPF from the
> > MVP?
>
> Ah yes, they are completely decoupled. You can:
>
> var
>VClient: TClient;
>VClientList: TPressProxyList;
> begin
>
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> Maybe my statement was not clear: The Parent/Child connection is the
> main problem. It would be easier to handle the child/parent
> relationship by the LCL and keep the 1:1 mapping between controls and
> handles.
> So, all that is needed is a TForeignHandleControl with a
Vincent Snijders wrote:
> Mattias Gaertner schreef:
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, Damien Gerard wrote:
> > I use this :
> > http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Streaming_components However
> > I ve got an exception error : Class "" not found (I put only a
> > panel).
>
>
>
> > Maybe t
Sam Liddicott wrote:
> Tom Gregorovic wrote:
> > Hi,
> > it crossed my mind that it would be convenient to have one search
> > service for all the information about Lazarus and Free Pascal, which
> > are in forums, mail list archives, documentation reference, wiki,
> > Mantis, SVN repository, SVN l
Sam Liddicott wrote:
> Al Boldi wrote:
> > Sam Liddicott wrote:
> >> I recommend xapian; www.xapian.org
> >>
> >> I've worked on it, I've used it and I've followed it's progress and
> >> when I worked at Orange we hired one
melchiorre caruso wrote:
> Al Boldi wrote:
> > melchiorre caruso wrote:
> >> procedure TTestLibrary.TestBtnClick(Sender: TObject);
> >> LibHandle := LoadLibrary('thread2lib.dll');
> >> CreateMyThreadFunc := GetProcedureAddress(LibHandle,'Create
melchiorre caruso wrote:
> procedure TTestLibrary.TestBtnClick(Sender: TObject);
> begin
> LibHandle := LoadLibrary('thread2lib.dll');
> CreateMyThreadFunc := GetProcedureAddress(LibHandle,
> 'CreateMyThread');
Make sure your library actually loads...
> if Assigned(CreateMyThreadFunc) then
melchiorre caruso wrote:
>
Can you post text only messages?
> I try to use CheckSyncronize() in the application loop but without
> result;
> The function synchronize appears to be broken and,
> the event on-terninate not be called. I do not know the reason.
Can you post example-code?
Thanks!
melchiorre caruso wrote:
> Al Boldi wrote:
> > melchiorre caruso wrote:
> >> if I use in execute method the source
> >>
> >> "if Assigned (FMethod) then
> >> FMethod;"
> >>
> >> instead of
> >>
> >> "
melchiorre caruso wrote:
> Al Boldi wrote:
> > So it's either an fpc or windows issue.
> >
> > Can you statically link it on windows, and see if it make a difference?
>
> I have statically linked library to application with this results
>
>
melchiorre caruso wrote:
> Can You send to me the source that runs correctly on linux?
I am using your source.
Thanks!
--
Al
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archiv
Roberto Padovani wrote:
> This helps me because I had some dll with many exported functions and
> with both call type.
> I hope someone will find it useful, as well.
Neat, but this only works on windows.
Can you make it cross-platform?
Thanks!
--
Al
___
Giuliano Colla wrote:
> To discover that if your timer event doesn't change something visual,
> the smart thing decides that there's nothing important to do, and stays
> Idle, so that the OnIdle handler is never called. My kludge has been to
> have the Timer update a Label in a hidden corner of the
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Razvan Adrian Bogdan wrote:
> > The synchronize method is simple but inefficient, it pauses your
> > thread until the main thread has time to execute your code and could
> > take some time until it does, i personally also dislike the fact that
> > o
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> Sam Liddicott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > THAT much works; so merely installing a cross-compiler deb will let
> > lazarus just pick it up and run
>
> Nice. Just like the existing fpc_crosswin32 package, but finally for
> more platforms. :)
I had a look at fpc_cross
Martin Schreiber wrote:
> Don't forget MSEide+MSEgui:
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mseide-msegui
> MSEgui has several possibilities to synchronize worker threads with the
> main GUI thread.
>
> First there is application.lock/unlok which works on a mutex. The main
> eventloop acquires the mute
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> > > Sam Liddicott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > THAT much works; so merely installing a cross-compiler deb will
> > > > let lazarus just pick it u
Martin Schreiber wrote:
> On Friday 14 December 2007 10.52, Al Boldi wrote:
> > Martin Schreiber wrote:
> > > Don't forget MSEide+MSEgui:
> > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/mseide-msegui
> > > MSEgui has several possibilities to synchronize work
Vincent Snijders wrote:
> Al Boldi schreef:
> > Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> >> Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> >>>> Sam Liddicott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>> THAT much works; so mere
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It would be nice to only have the absolute minimum needed to enable
> > cross-compile. The tools should be in another package.
>
> The tools are for example assembler and windres.
> Some tools like
1 - 100 of 220 matches
Mail list logo
