Hello to all,
Any (good) news for those people who, as I did, have just installed
Open SUSE 10.1? How's going the Lazarus Version for SUSE.?
Please, let me know
TIA
Stefano
___
Quipo Free Internet - 2 email, 150 Mb di spazio web
franzato wrote:
> Hello to all,
> Any (good) news for those people who, as I did, have just installed
> Open SUSE 10.1? How's going the Lazarus Version for SUSE.?
>
> Please, let me know
>
> TIA
>
> Stefano
What's the problem?
I am runnung lazarus on suse 10.1 too.
No problem at all.
Uwe
___
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 14:44:41 +0200
Armin Diehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> attached a patch that will change:
> - changes in iphtml.pas,iputils.pas and ipfilebroker.pas (against
> original contents from ipbroker.pas) are now within ifdef IP_LAZARUS
> - added a hack for the registry for 2.0.2 as
Hi all,
This morning when I launched Lazarus to continue my work on my
project, it simply refused to display the Form (only the .lfm source).
It complains about invalid properties (but they are good). The form
was working well yesterday when I leaved.
I really don't know what to do!
Here is the
2006/6/28, Alexandre Leclerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
WideDefaultText =
When I compiled and executed, at run time I've been tell that this was
invalid... I removed it and all was correct after. I don't know how it
jumped there.
--
Alexandre Leclerc
The problem was the lack of libglib1.2-dev as well as the
corresponding gdk_pixbuf library. I have installed them and now
everything works great. My alien'ed fpc deb did install an
/etc/fpc.cfg (maybe it doesn't if you don't specify alien --scripts
?). Thanks for the help guys!
Ramon
Alexandre Leclerc escreveu:
Hi all,
This morning when I launched Lazarus to continue my work on my
project, it simply refused to display the Form (only the .lfm source).
It complains about invalid properties (but they are good). The form
was working well yesterday when I leaved.
I really don't
2006/6/28, Luiz Americo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I also have this problem. Just set some value to WideDefaultText (=
'SomeText') in the lfm. Then in OnCreate set again to an empty string.
It seems a bug related to streaming empty widestrings.
Very good to know, Indeed I saw that I loosed a property
Under win32: I compiled a new Lazarus and FPC compiler from both
latest SVN and the debugger fails to execute. I can't run my
application with the debugger. It always falls in error state.
Anyone can confirm this?
--
Alexandre Leclerc
I try too use getopts unit with a normal windowed applicaitons and
this is simply not working. The moment GetLongOpts is called, my
software is unstable... even the debugger is now able to trace into
the unit.
Any pointers would be appreciated.
--
Alexandre Leclerc
_
Ok, forget about that... it debugs, but... still need improvements ;)
2006/6/28, Alexandre Leclerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Under win32: I compiled a new Lazarus and FPC compiler from both
latest SVN and the debugger fails to execute. I can't run my
application with the debugger. It always falls in
Hi,
it is lookinhg for: libglib.so
there should be a link to: libglib-1.2.so.0.0.10
libglib.so -> libglib-1.2.so.0.0.10
and the folder where this is should be known to the compiler. For
example if this is in: /usr/local/lib
then this dir should be listed in: /etc/fpc.cfg
On Wed, 2006-06
Ok, I found an issues...
- If no short options are passed in param, this will lamentably crash
if passing such an option in the command line (ex: myapp -f).
What about a redesign of TOption array to also include the single-char
switch of a long option (replacing the 'value' field). So the match
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 23:32:48 +0200
"Graeme Geldenhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Attached is a patch for /components/fpcunit. The patch should be
> applied from the root Lazarus directory.
>
> It is a combined patch (a few files have changes).
>
> Change:
> * A new unit has been adde
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 22:59:51 +0200
"Graeme Geldenhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Dean,
>
> Okay, I saw what I did wrong. I added the SynEdit requirement to my
> own unit test project, instead of to the fpcUnit GUI Runner package.
>
> I submitted another patch (part 3) which should be appl
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 23:36:48 +0200
"Graeme Geldenhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> [Part 2 of 2]
> Not sure if I needed to send this file - I believe it gets generated
> automatically.
Correct.
I added the missing files to the package.
Mattias
> It is the .lrs file of fpcunit. I at
Well, the debugger really has problems with latest versions. When
complaining it prints: ntdll...
--
Alexandre Leclerc
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http:
Hi all,
I'm looking for an image library that could open and display jpg, png,
bmp. Then with this class be able to convert that in a standard
TBitmap so that I can draw in canvas, etc.
If the class can be brilliant (auto-detect the file format) that would be nice.
TSuperPicture.LoadFromFile('im
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking for an image library that could open and display jpg, png,
> bmp. Then with this class be able to convert that in a standard
> TBitmap so that I can draw in canvas, etc.
>
> If the class can be brilliant (auto-detect the f
Hi.
Lazarus svn trunk (r9524).
Linux i386
"make bigide" fails. The Makefile in components/fpcunit/ seems to be
defect: $(LCL_PLATFORM) is empty. Running fpcmake in components/
fpcunit/ corrects this.
Regards
Burkhard
_
To un
Am Donnerstag, 29. Juni 2006 08:19 schrieb Burkhard Carstens:
> Hi.
>
> Lazarus svn trunk (r9524).
> Linux i386
>
> "make bigide" fails. The Makefile in components/fpcunit/ seems to be
> defect: $(LCL_PLATFORM) is empty. Running fpcmake in components/
> fpcunit/ corrects this.
WOW! That was fast!!
On 6/28/06, Mattias Gaertner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Okay, I saw what I did wrong. I added the SynEdit requirement to my
> own unit test project, instead of to the fpcUnit GUI Runner package.
>
> I submitted another patch (part 3) which should be applied after the
> previous two to get it
That might have been my fault. My last patch incorporated changes
from Darius to the Makefile.fpc. I thought that the Makefile always
gets generated from the fpcmake, so I didn't need to patch the
Makefile.
Have I miss understood the build process?
Regards,
- Graeme -
On 6/29/06, Burkhard C
23 matches
Mail list logo
