Zitat von Marco van de Voort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 12:42:28PM +0100, Vincent Snijders wrote:
> It would be nice if the fpcdoc xml files could be easily installed
> via packages.
> >>> What do you mean? What is missing?
> >> For example: I don't see any of the xml
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 12:42:28PM +0100, Vincent Snijders wrote:
It would be nice if the fpcdoc xml files could be easily installed
via packages.
>>> What do you mean? What is missing?
>> For example: I don't see any of the xml files in the debian packages.
>
> I see. I thought you were
Mattias Gaertner schreef:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:09:17 +0100
Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mattias Gaertner schreef:
It would be nice if the fpcdoc xml files could be easily installed
via packages.
What do you mean? What is missing?
For example: I don't see any of the xml file
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:09:17 +0100
Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mattias Gaertner schreef:
> >
> > It would be nice if the fpcdoc xml files could be easily installed
> > via packages.
>
> What do you mean? What is missing?
For example: I don't see any of the xml files in the deb
Mattias Gaertner schreef:
It would be nice if the fpcdoc xml files could be easily installed via
packages.
What do you mean? What is missing?
Vincent
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe"
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 09:55:26 +0200
"Graeme Geldenhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 27/11/2007, Chris Kirkpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > FPCDoc. The RTL and FCL descriptor files are not, however, in the
> > SVN repository or distributions, as the libraries and their
> > documentation
On 27/11/2007, Chris Kirkpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FPCDoc. The RTL and FCL descriptor files are not, however, in the SVN
> repository or distributions, as the libraries and their documentation
> are considered to be much more mature and stable. I imagine you could
They *are* in a svn re
Wanderlan Santos dos Anjos wrote:
Is RTL documented in the same XML format that LCL documents?
As far as I know, all the on-line help files for RTL and FCL were
produced in the same way as the LCL documentation, using .XML files and
FPCDoc. The RTL and FCL descriptor files are not, however, i
Is RTL documented in the same XML format that LCL documents?
If yes, because not to integrate RTL documents with LCL documents?
Wanderlan Santos dos Anjos
Several types and classes that are ancestors of classes in the LCL are
not found in the RTL, and it is difficult to document the LCL classes
completely without them. These include many classes with TFPx
prefixes; some examples are TFPCanvas and related classes, found in
fpc/packages/fcl-ima
10 matches
Mail list logo
