Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus and MySQL 5.7

2016-11-22 Thread Lars via Lazarus
On Mon, November 21, 2016 2:33 am, Graeme Geldenhuys via Lazarus wrote: > On 2016-11-21 00:30, Giuliano Colla via Lazarus wrote: > >> Lazarus 1.6 includes the package SQLDBLaz which provides support for >> MySQL from >> versions 4.0 to 5.6. > > Yes, and that "Lazarus Packages" is simply a IDE wrapp

Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus and MySQL 5.7

2016-11-22 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys via Lazarus
On 2016-11-22 13:53, Lars via Lazarus wrote: > I first realized this when I needed a button that had new behavior in > Delphi.. so I created my own. Then I realized that any time I install the > IDE on a system, I now have the headache of having to install a non > standard component in order to use

[Lazarus] Clarification about VirtualTreeView repositories (lazarus-ccr/virtualtreeview-new deprecation)

2016-11-22 Thread Luiz Americo Pereira Camara via Lazarus
Currently there are three repositories of VirtualTreeView LCL port. In Lazarus-CCR: virtualtreeview: first port, long unmaintained virtualtreeview-new: original repository of the current port In GitHub: https://github.com/blikblum/VirtualTreeView-Lazarus : active repository of current port Some

Re: [Lazarus] Clarification about VirtualTreeView repositories (lazarus-ccr/virtualtreeview-new deprecation)

2016-11-22 Thread denisgolovan via Lazarus
Hi Luiz Americo Pereira Camara Maybe it's better to keep standard git naming like master (for current), and simple branches like v4,v5,v6,... as necessary? Why having non-standard lazarus_master in _new_ repo?Is existing master just an old "history"? Please keep it simple.  22.11.2016, 20:28, "Luiz

Re: [Lazarus] Is the TODO list working?

2016-11-22 Thread Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 15:20:52 -0300 silvioprog via Lazarus wrote: > Oops, > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 3:14 PM, silvioprog wrote: > [...] > > > > ... it seems the TODO list windows isn't working, however I don't know ... > > > > I meant: "... it seems the TODO list window isn't working, it alw

Re: [Lazarus] Clarification about VirtualTreeView repositories (lazarus-ccr/virtualtreeview-new deprecation)

2016-11-22 Thread Werner Pamler via Lazarus
Am 22.11.2016 um 18:28 schrieb Luiz Americo Pereira Camara via Lazarus: Currently there are three repositories of VirtualTreeView LCL port. In Lazarus-CCR: virtualtreeview: first port, long unmaintained virtualtreeview-new: original repository of the current port In GitHub: https://github.com/

Re: [Lazarus] Clarification about VirtualTreeView repositories (lazarus-ccr/virtualtreeview-new deprecation)

2016-11-22 Thread Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus
On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 14:28:31 -0300 Luiz Americo Pereira Camara via Lazarus wrote: > Currently there are three repositories of VirtualTreeView LCL port. > > In Lazarus-CCR: > > virtualtreeview: first port, long unmaintained > virtualtreeview-new: original repository of the current port Proposal

Re: [Lazarus] Clarification about VirtualTreeView repositories (lazarus-ccr/virtualtreeview-new deprecation)

2016-11-22 Thread Ondrej Pokorny via Lazarus
On 22.11.2016 18:53, Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus wrote: On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 14:28:31 -0300 Luiz Americo Pereira Camara via Lazarus wrote: Currently there are three repositories of VirtualTreeView LCL port. In Lazarus-CCR: virtualtreeview: first port, long unmaintained virtualtreeview-new: o

Re: [Lazarus] Clarification about VirtualTreeView repositories (lazarus-ccr/virtualtreeview-new deprecation)

2016-11-22 Thread Luiz Americo Pereira Camara via Lazarus
2016-11-22 14:58 GMT-03:00 Ondrej Pokorny via Lazarus < lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org>: > On 22.11.2016 18:53, Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus wrote: > >> Proposal: >> Delete files in those folders and add README.txt pointing to new >> repository. >> > > What will be the new one and only repository?

Re: [Lazarus] Clarification about VirtualTreeView repositories (lazarus-ccr/virtualtreeview-new deprecation)

2016-11-22 Thread Luiz Americo Pereira Camara via Lazarus
2016-11-22 14:44 GMT-03:00 Werner Pamler via Lazarus < lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org>: > > Luiz, I like your idea to add a non-commented hint to the main source > file. So every user will get notified at compilation that he is using an > unsupported version. > > Shouldn't we do the same with > - Z

Re: [Lazarus] Is the TODO list working?

2016-11-22 Thread Bart via Lazarus
On 11/22/16, Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus wrote: > http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/IDE_Window:_ToDo_List Most of my ToDo's are in //ToDo: format, which I see is not handled. I must admit I never tried that package. Bart -- ___ Lazarus mailing li

Re: [Lazarus] Clarification about VirtualTreeView repositories (lazarus-ccr/virtualtreeview-new deprecation)

2016-11-22 Thread Werner Pamler via Lazarus
Am 22.11.2016 um 19:05 schrieb Luiz Americo Pereira Camara via Lazarus: 2016-11-22 14:44 GMT-03:00 Werner Pamler via Lazarus mailto:lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org>>: Luiz, I like your idea to add a non-commented hint to the main source file. So every user will get notified at compilat