On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 13:49:16 +
Graeme Geldenhuys via Lazarus wrote:
> On 2016-11-08 13:14, Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus wrote:
> > In this case codetools don't have enough information. Because it does
> > not know the former connection.
>
> By why does it work if I do them one at a time. eg
On 2016-11-08 14:45, Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus wrote:
> Just do changes one by one and you are good to go.
Thanks for the explanations... I'll continue has I have been doing, one
at a time.
Regards,
Graeme
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@list
On 08.11.2016 14:49, Graeme Geldenhuys via Lazarus wrote:
On 2016-11-08 13:14, Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus wrote:
In this case codetools don't have enough information. Because it does
not know the former connection.
By why does it work if I do them one at a time. eg: Change the first
interface
On 2016-11-08 13:14, Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus wrote:
> In this case codetools don't have enough information. Because it does
> not know the former connection.
By why does it work if I do them one at a time. eg: Change the first
interface declaration and do code completion. Change the second
in
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 13:00:44 +
Graeme Geldenhuys via Lazarus wrote:
>[...]
> I can confirm, I've seen this quite a few times recently too.
>
> Not sure if this is related:
> Another way to reproduce this is to change the parameters of two
> overloaded methods and then do Ctrl+Shift+C to cla
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 13:10:40 +0100 (CET)
Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 6 Nov 2016 18:05:39 +0100 (CET)
> > Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus wrote:
> >
> >> [...]
> >> - Function to function,
> >>
> >> - Procedure
On 2016-11-08 12:10, Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus wrote:
>> >
>> > Why does that cause a compiler error?
> Because both procedures remained in the sources.
I can confirm, I've seen this quite a few times recently too.
Not sure if this is related:
Another way to reproduce this is to change th
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus wrote:
On Sun, 6 Nov 2016 18:05:39 +0100 (CET)
Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus wrote:
[...]
- Function to function,
- Procedure to procedure
- and the setter in
property Values[const Name: string]: string read GetValue write SetValue;
On Sun, 6 Nov 2016 18:05:39 +0100 (CET)
Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus wrote:
>[...]
> - Function to function,
>
> - Procedure to procedure
>
> - and the setter in
>
>property Values[const Name: string]: string read GetValue write SetValue;
>
>is changed from
>
>procedure SetVal
On 11/8/16, Lars via Lazarus wrote:
> On Sun, November 6, 2016 10:05 am, Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus wrote:
>>
>> press ctrl-c to do command-completion
>
> If ctrl - c is for copying, how does this not interfere?
It is Shift+Ctrl+C by default.
Bart
--
__
On Sun, November 6, 2016 10:05 am, Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus wrote:
>
> press ctrl-c to do command-completion
If ctrl - c is for copying, how does this not interfere?
i.e. ctrl c is for copy and paste, so... how is ctrl-c used for command
completion without interfering with clipboard?
--
_
On Sun, 6 Nov 2016, Bart via Lazarus wrote:
On 11/6/16, Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus
wrote:
Why does the IDE insist on reformatting existing declarations ?
Tools->Options->Codetools->Class Completion
Uncheck: "Update all method signatures" ?
Well, thank you very much.
I should visi
On 11/6/16, Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus
wrote:
> Why does the IDE insist on reformatting existing declarations ?
Tools->Options->Codetools->Class Completion
Uncheck: "Update all method signatures" ?
Bart
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists
13 matches
Mail list logo
