01.07.2023 3:13, Giuliano Colla пишет:
Il 01/07/23 00:49, Maxim Ganetsky via lazarus ha scritto:
2. clDark is deprecated on 23.11.2008 with a bunch of other CLX
colors. All these colors are NOT present in Delphi. Your code emitted
warnings at least for 10 years!
Just for clarity, CLX *is* pa
Il 01/07/23 00:49, Maxim Ganetsky via lazarus ha scritto:
2. clDark
is deprecated on 23.11.2008 with a bunch of other CLX colors. All
these colors are NOT present in Delphi. Your code emitted warnings
at least for 10 years!
Just for clarity, CLX is part of
30.06.2023 22:16, Giuliano Colla via lazarus пишет:
I promise, this is the last mail from me in this thread. :)
If the brilliant minds which have elaborated a new numbering scheme had
spent their time in something more productive, such as making life a
little bit easier to developers, I bel
Il 30/06/23 19:40, Mattias Gaertner via lazarus ha scritto:
Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus wrote:
[...]
Honestly: I'll settle for actually managing to get a release out.
+1000
+1000 me too.
If the brilliant minds which have elaborated a new numbering scheme had
spent their time in som
On Fri, 30 Jun 2023 16:25:47 +0200 (CEST)
Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus wrote:
>[...]
> Honestly: I'll settle for actually managing to get a release out.
+1000
Mattias
--
___
lazarus mailing list
lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
https://lists.lazarus-
30.06.2023 17:25, Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus пишет:
On Fri, 30 Jun 2023, Maxim Ganetsky via lazarus wrote:
30.06.2023 16:55, Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus пишет:
On Fri, 30 Jun 2023, Maxim Ganetsky via lazarus wrote:
Basically, version numbering is all about "marketing". By always
On Fri, 30 Jun 2023, Maxim Ganetsky via lazarus wrote:
30.06.2023 16:55, Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus пишет:
On Fri, 30 Jun 2023, Maxim Ganetsky via lazarus wrote:
Basically, version numbering is all about "marketing". By always
increasing major version we tell to the general audience
30.06.2023 16:55, Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus пишет:
On Fri, 30 Jun 2023, Maxim Ganetsky via lazarus wrote:
Basically, version numbering is all about "marketing". By always
increasing major version we tell to the general audience that major
release indeed contains major changes (which is
On Fri, 30 Jun 2023, Maxim Ganetsky via lazarus wrote:
Basically, version numbering is all about "marketing". By always
increasing major version we tell to the general audience that major
release indeed contains major changes (which is always the case).
So we solve/improve "marketing" issu
On Fri, 30 Jun 2023, Maxim Ganetsky via lazarus wrote:
30.06.2023 14:27, Martin Frb via lazarus пишет:
On 30/06/2023 12:51, Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jun 2023, Juha Manninen via lazarus wrote:
On Friday, June 30, 2023, John Landmesser via lazarus <
lazarus@lists.l
30.06.2023 16:44, Maxim Ganetsky via lazarus пишет:
30.06.2023 14:27, Martin Frb via lazarus пишет:
On 30/06/2023 12:51, Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jun 2023, Juha Manninen via lazarus wrote:
On Friday, June 30, 2023, John Landmesser via lazarus <
lazarus@lists.lazarus
30.06.2023 14:27, Martin Frb via lazarus пишет:
On 30/06/2023 12:51, Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jun 2023, Juha Manninen via lazarus wrote:
On Friday, June 30, 2023, John Landmesser via lazarus <
lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote:
perhaps that should have become 3.
On 30/06/2023 14:04, Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus wrote:
So basically you did a shift left of the version number ?
Not exactly, that would mean that major releases would be 4.0 and 6.0.
Leaving 3 and 5 for development versions.
- We combined the first 2 digits into one. (because there se
On Fri, 30 Jun 2023, Martin Frb via lazarus wrote:
On 30/06/2023 13:27, Martin Frb via lazarus wrote:
But, there was no need (anymore) to reserve 2 digits for major releases.
When 1.0 was released there was no need for further major releases to be
1.2 instead of 2.0.
I forgot to add the
On 30/06/2023 13:27, Martin Frb via lazarus wrote:
But, there was no need (anymore) to reserve 2 digits for major
releases. When 1.0 was released there was no need for further major
releases to be 1.2 instead of 2.0.
I forgot to add the explanation for "anymore"
Prior to 1.0 the minor and p
On 30/06/2023 12:51, Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jun 2023, Juha Manninen via lazarus wrote:
On Friday, June 30, 2023, John Landmesser via lazarus <
lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote:
perhaps that should have become 3.00 ?
Lazarus *3.99* (rev main_3_99-41-g3d8dd8547
On Fri, 30 Jun 2023, Juha Manninen via lazarus wrote:
On Friday, June 30, 2023, John Landmesser via lazarus <
lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote:
perhaps that should have become 3.00 ?
Lazarus *3.99* (rev main_3_99-41-g3d8dd85474) FPC 3.2.2 x86_64-linux-gtk2
You are looking at trunk, th
On Friday, June 30, 2023, John Landmesser via lazarus <
lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote:
> perhaps that should have become 3.00 ?
>
> Lazarus *3.99* (rev main_3_99-41-g3d8dd85474) FPC 3.2.2 x86_64-linux-gtk2
>
> You are looking at trunk, the development version. See :
https://wiki.freepascal
perhaps that should have become 3.00 ?
Lazarus *3.99* (rev main_3_99-41-g3d8dd85474) FPC 3.2.2 x86_64-linux-gtk2
Yes, Just a number!
--
___
lazarus mailing list
lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
19 matches
Mail list logo
