17.07.2022 15:09, Marco van de Voort via lazarus пишет:
On 16-7-2022 21:27, Maxim Ganetsky via lazarus wrote:
It is actually worse, it's Git->SVN. Although the patch set is not
very big (and looks fine BTW), so it's doable.
But IMO, this tool should just be incorporated into Lazarus sources
Zeljko, currently gtk3 WS is not able to run my text editor app. Various
visual bugs in the main form. I will be happy to pay you (initial
author) 200$ if you fix the gtk3 for my editor (others will benefit too
in theory).
Alexey
--
___
lazarus ma
On 18-7-2022 12:03, Petr Hložek via lazarus wrote:
I'm sorry, maybe a stupid question. Why trying to implement Gtk3 when
we have Gtk4? Gtk3 will be outdated very soon and the problem will be
the same like with Gtk2.
It is not known how much it even matters for the subset that LCL uses.
Intere
Hi,
I'm sorry, maybe a stupid question. Why trying to implement Gtk3 when
we have Gtk4? Gtk3 will be outdated very soon and the problem will be
the same like with Gtk2.
Petr
po 18. 7. 2022 v 11:59 odesílatel zeljko via lazarus
napsal:
>
>
>
> On 15. 07. 2022. 13:47, Anthony Walter via lazarus w
On 15. 07. 2022. 13:47, Anthony Walter via lazarus wrote:
Denis,
I will attempt the big design flaws I have found so far while wrangling
with the current Gtk3 widget implementation.
There are three main layers underpinning cross platform LCL widgetset.
1) We obviously have the LCL itself th
