Okay, Back to the original topic.
The duplicates in graphics.xml are almost certainly because they are
overloaded methods. Whether that is correct in the context of the tool
used to update the file, I do not know,
I am submitting a patch for other files with duplicate topics.This
does not include
>> I edit manually too. It's neither difficult nor error prone. I get
>> exactly the FP Doc markup that I feel is appropriate.
> Now we have a problem. FPDocEditor and LazDocEditor ARE distributed with
> Lazarus, and nobody is prevented from using them. So, when I modify one
> of your recent xml f
> makeskel does support update, the Makefile of fpc docs has even a target for
> it ?
> It only does additions, though.
> I suppose that deletions should also be easily added.
>
> Michael.
My initial efforts to use it were in the Lazarus 1.8.x time frame. and
it would not run without exception the
Am 19.12.2019 um 20:48 schrieb Don Siders via lazarus:
That's a possibility. Mistakes happen. But in looking at the file
there are several duplicates. I don't think I would have been that
careless.
Just to make sure: It was never my intention to say that you did.
I edit manually too. It's ne
On Thu, 19 Dec 2019, Don Siders via lazarus wrote:
BTW: User Don Siders is doing an excellent job in continuously
submitting patches for the xml files. The help files have improved
considerably since then (I wonder how he is editing the xml files.)
Thanks for the compliment.
I am using the
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 10:24 AM wrote:
> From: Werner Pamler
> Subject: Re: [Lazarus] Duplicate items in xml doc files
> Message-ID:
> But now I am quite confused because it does not necessarily
> consider all nodes in a file. As we see here, there are two
> TCanvas.PolyBezier nodes in the sa
