On Friday 01 December 2017 08:01:06 Graeme Geldenhuys via Lazarus wrote:
> On 2017-12-01 06:42, Martin Schreiber via Lazarus wrote:
> > That is your opinion, my opinion is that RAD is the most productive
> > development technology for most of the projects if done right,
>
> And your last 3 words is
On 2017-12-01 06:42, Martin Schreiber via Lazarus wrote:
That is your opinion, my opinion is that RAD is the most productive
development technology for most of the projects if done right,
And your last 3 words is the most important part - "if done right". In
my 20+ years of using Delphi, I can
On Friday 01 December 2017 00:30:05 Graeme Geldenhuys via Lazarus wrote:
> On 2017-11-30 11:46, Michael Schnell via Lazarus wrote:
> > Nonetheless, IMHO RAD is a great way to start programming, as you
> > immediately and painlessly can see (visualize) what your "business
>
> RAD should only be used
On 2017-11-30 11:46, Michael Schnell via Lazarus wrote:
Nonetheless, IMHO RAD is a great way to start programming, as you
immediately and painlessly can see (visualize) what your "business
RAD should only be used for prototyping. ie: once the prototype is done
and not needed, bin the code. And
Thanks FPC developers for the release!
Juha
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=32753
1. It is tested on Gtk2 and Win32. Gtk1 is not tested [but code is copy
pasted, 4..5 values for vert scroll - copied block with 6..7 values for
horz scroll, 6..7 is from gtk doc].
2. Maybe change issue section to "Patches"
3. you applied micro pa
Thanks for looking into this!
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 12:52:38 +0100
Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:26:21 +0100
> kardan via Lazarus wrote:
>
> > With current https://bitbucket.org/tkweb/kcontrols/get/tip.zip our
> > project https://github.com/tomboy-notes/tomboy-ng f
On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 16:53:15 +0300
Alexey via Lazarus wrote:
> LCL don't support it.
> Pls apply this diff- only constant LM_MouseHWHeel
>
> https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms645614(v=vs.85).aspx
I added it.
Mattias
--
___
L
On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:26:21 +0100
kardan via Lazarus wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 22:53:36 +0300
> Alexey via Lazarus wrote:
>
> > https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=32717
> >
> > Otherwise, this dialog is not scaled.
>
> Is there a chance to make Lazarus 1.8 build natively with KCont
On 30.11.2017 12:09, el es via Lazarus wrote:
It is not easy to break free from old, ... programming practices
Nonetheless, IMHO RAD is a great way to start programming, as you
immediately and painlessly can see (visualize) what your "business
logic" software does and easily set parameters an
On 29/11/17 23:02, Graeme Geldenhuys via Lazarus wrote:
> On 2017-11-28 09:02, Michael Schnell via Lazarus wrote:
>> and support for Delphi-typical RAD-style development.
>
> RAD style development is highly overrated - I wish you can see the
> mess I'm looking at (not my code). Each form are 1000
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 20:21:47 +0100
kardan via Lazarus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> summary: my fpc and ppcross* have different versions, because I can't
> build fpc with the installed version. Why does this happen:
>
> ~/src/fpc(master)$ make all
> Makefile:2918: *** The only supported starting compiler ve
Hello,
Finally, the Free Pascal 3.0.4 release is available from our FTP servers.
Changes that may break backwards compatibility will be documented at:
http://wiki.freepascal.org/User_Changes_3_0_4
For Downloads, please use the FTP server at
ftp://freepascal.stack.nl/pub/fpc/dist/3.0.4/
and sou
Hi,
it looks like I need to train my patience a bit more.
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 20:21:47 +0100
kardan via Lazarus wrote:
> summary: my fpc and ppcross* have different versions, because I can't
> build fpc with the installed version. Why does this happen:
>
> ~/src/fpc(master)$ make all
> Makefil
On 30.11.2017 10:04, Michael Schnell via Lazarus wrote:
e.g. a small embedded device or to allow running them as a service..
Of course another important "headless environment" is server
applications with built-in Web server or sitting behind a standard
WebServer.
-Michael
--
On 30.11.2017 00:02, Graeme Geldenhuys via Lazarus wrote:
RAD style development is highly overrated...
I do know that very exactly, been there often enough.
RAD is great to create "small" applications, but with huge projects, you
will very likely hit a limit where you wish you would not have
16 matches
Mail list logo