Am 24.09.2017 um 15:41 schrieb Michael W. Vogel via Lazarus:
Am 24.09.2017 um 11:41 schrieb Juha Manninen via Lazarus:
Regarding issue:
https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=32375
Could somebody please provide a debugger backtrace and preferably a
patch to fix it.
Also finding out which rev
Am 24.09.2017 um 11:41 schrieb Juha Manninen via Lazarus:
Regarding issue:
https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=32375
Could somebody please provide a debugger backtrace and preferably a
patch to fix it.
Also finding out which revision caused the regression would be helpful.
http://wiki.f
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 5:25 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys via Lazarus
wrote:
> On 2017-09-21 04:06, Marcos Douglas B. Santos via Lazarus wrote:
>>
>>
>> Nah... most of them know nothing about true OOP.
>> They believe that an object is a "record" with getters and setters...
>> anyway.
>
>
> If I understa
Regarding issue:
https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=32375
Could somebody please provide a debugger backtrace and preferably a
patch to fix it.
Also finding out which revision caused the regression would be helpful.
http://wiki.freepascal.org/How_do_I_create_a_bug_report#Regression_caused_b
On Sun, 24 Sep 2017, Graeme Geldenhuys via Lazarus wrote:
On 2017-09-24 09:02, Graeme Geldenhuys via Lazarus wrote:
Of course I would normally agree with that, but if you look at the Java
annotations in that article
Just curious, I know C# has annotations support too. Does Delphi?
Yes.
On 2017-09-24 09:02, Graeme Geldenhuys via Lazarus wrote:
Of course I would normally agree with that, but if you look at the Java
annotations in that article
Just curious, I know C# has annotations support too. Does Delphi?
Regards,
Graeme
--
___
On 2017-09-23 12:36, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
That's actually a step backwards.
Because it breaks the separation of object and storage.
Of course I would normally agree with that, but if you look at the Java
annotations in that article - they are not code per-se, but more like
small code co
On 2017-09-24 08:31, Sven Barth via Lazarus wrote:
Holy Trinity of programming (with the third being operating systems) I
personally am not surprised as writing any of those three is a hard task,
much harder than e.g. a documentation generator and we definitely don't
have the manpower for that.
Am 23.09.2017 18:30 schrieb "Graeme Geldenhuys via Lazarus" <
lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org>:
>
> On 2017-09-23 12:36, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>>>
>>> FPC doesn't even cover the most basic of things - no decent debugger
>>> that can handle all the Object Pascal language features. :-/
>
> >
>>
>>
