[l2h] Re: latex2html

2006-02-10 Thread Ross Moore
Hello Emil, On 10/02/2006, at 3:40 PM, Emil Mikulic wrote: Hi there. I've been playing around with latex2html lately and found a number of issues that I'm trying to hack my way around. I thought it might be a good idea to get in touch with anyone who's working on it, rather than doing this in

[l2h] Re: latex2html question

2006-02-02 Thread Ross Moore
Hello Ruye, On 03/02/2006, at 12:29 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear ross, I have a quick question regarding latex2html. On one computer, latex2html will generate all math formular images with a shade on the left and bottom of the formula, while I run latex2html on another computer, the

[l2h] Re: latex2html return of table bug

2005-09-13 Thread Daniel Clemente
>The bug you fixed a while back where LyX documents with tables were >badly rendered by latex2html into webpages (truncating the table after >the 1st row) seems to have come back - at least on the SuSE 9.3 distro. It may not be fixed yet; I don't know when a new version of latex2html will come

[l2h] Re: latex2html return of table bug.

2005-09-10 Thread John O'Gorman
Hi Ross (or anyone else who may be concerned). The bug you fixed a while back where LyX documents with tables were badly rendered by latex2html into webpages (truncating the table after the 1st row) seems to have come back - at least on the SuSE 9.3 distro. What is the best way round this? When

[l2h] Re: latex2html Digest, Vol 23, Issue 8

2004-11-08 Thread Henry Meyerding
Thanks for the information. I am not sure I understand how to implement the fixes described in the referenced document. What would happen if I uninstalled the latex rpms that came with fedora and then obtained fresh ones from rpmfind. I see a tetex-2.0.2-23.ia64.rpm is available on rpmfind, but

[l2h] Re: latex2html license: "A Letter to Leeds University", round 2

2004-01-14 Thread Roland Stigge
Hi Branden, thanks for your suggestions. Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:12:07 -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > If it's not too late, I have a suggestion. > > Change: > > Changing the license terms would allow the program to return to our > main distribution and facilitate the already large user base of > La

Re: [l2h] Re: latex2html, different version of tex-files

2003-11-23 Thread Jens Lehmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 23 Nov 2003 at 12:00, [...] Please don't write HTML mails. Thanks. Jens -- PGP Public Key: http://studenten-dresden.de/public_key.asc ___ latex2html mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/latex2html

[l2h] Re: latex2html, different version of tex-files

2003-11-23 Thread webmaster
On 23 Nov 2003 at 12:00, many people wrote: > >   If I knew then what I know now, I would have said 'I don't recall'. > -- next part -- #! /usr/bin/perl -w > > use strict; > > my $tex=join "",<>; > my %opt; > $opt{$2}=$1 eq "in" while $tex =~ > /\\(in|ex)cludecommen

[l2h] Re: latex2html won't do...

2003-03-21 Thread Ross Moore
Hello Steffen, > Hello! > > I installed latex2html followind the instructions in the README file and > everything seemed to be fine... but when i called "latex2html file.tex" the > following error occured: Which version of latex2html did you install ? THe latest version is available at www.lat

[l2h] Re: latex2html Digest, Vol 2, Issue 15 (From Colombia)

2003-02-21 Thread Christophe Grandsire
En réponse à Alvaro Salas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > .Hi Cristopher ! > It's "Christophe", I'm French :)) . But hi anyway :) . > > I received your message about latex2html installation on Windows ME. I > don´t use Windows ME. Instead, I use Linux Red Hat 7.3, Windows 98 > (second Edition) and Wind

[l2h] Re: latex2html Digest, Vol 2, Issue 15 (From Colombia)

2003-02-20 Thread Alvaro Salas
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Send latex2html mailing list submissions to[EMAIL PROTECTED]To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visithttp://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/latex2htmlor, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to[EMAIL PROTECTED]You can reach the person managing

[l2h] Re: latex2html manual

2003-01-28 Thread Ross Moore
> Dear Dr. Ross, > > I was wondering whether or not the latex2html manual is also available as a > .ps or a .pdf file? It used to be included with the LaTeX2HTML distribution. But if this is no longer the case, try: http://www-texdev.ics.mq.edu.au/l2h/docs/manual.ps or http://www-texdev.ics

[l2h] Re: Latex2Html Bug & Fixing

2002-09-27 Thread Ross Moore
Hello Stephan, > Hello Ross, > > I'm using latex2html version 2002 1.67 on a window2K platform and no > images are included. config.bat has problems with > determining the dvips version. I edited the config/config.pl file and > changes the paramter '--version' into '-version'. > After that it w

[l2h] Re: latex2html

2002-07-26 Thread Ross Moore
> Hi, > I'm trying to get latex2html not to generate a separate section for the > bibliography, but with no success unless changing latex2html. I wonder > if you could tell if there is an easier way of doing it. The default is to set the sectioning level of the bibliography to be the lowest for

[l2h] Re: LaTeX2HTML 2002 (1.67): latin2 option does not work?

2002-06-20 Thread Janusz S. Bień
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 Ross Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks for quick answer. > > You're welcome. > > > On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 Ross Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > to have latin2 as *both* the input encoding and the output encoding. > > > > > > > Isn't this rather c

[l2h] Re: LaTeX2HTML \verb / \verb* problem

2002-03-01 Thread Ross Moore
> I posted this to the mailing list but got no response. It seems > that LaTeX2HTML does not bother to distinguish between \verb and \verb*. It does now. Get the latest revision (1.62) of latex2html.pin from www.latex2html.org Here are the diffs if you want to patch a version that is inst

[l2h] Re: LaTeX2HTML \verb / \verb* problem

2002-02-27 Thread Ross Moore
Hi Logan, Sorry, I haven't had time to track this one yet. > I posted this to the mailing list but got no response. It seems > that LaTeX2HTML does not bother to distinguish between \verb and \verb*. > It performs some sort of internal translation and does not remember > whether inline verb

Re: [l2h] Re: Latex2html Win98 problem

2002-02-25 Thread Ross Moore
> Why do you need the spaces? Won't > > system("$cmd>$tmp"); > > work? Perhaps. Anyway, it seems like the problem was due to a bug in Perl itself --- a specific version on a specific platform. If someone who experienced this could write a brief report, giving the fix (update Perl) and an

[l2h] Re: Latex2html Win98 problem

2002-02-24 Thread Ross Moore
James Lynch writes: >Ross, > >Hello. I am at least the third person having the same problem on Windows 98 when >trying to > use Latex2html on any file with equations in it. I saw that you seemed to be an >authority on the subject and was hoping to get some help. The pr

[l2h] Re: Latex2HTML and Prettyref

2002-01-31 Thread Jon Schutz
Ross, Please find attached my implementation of prettyref.perl. It works very well for me, although I'm sure it won't handle all possible cases. Please feel free to redistribute and/or modify it, or not, as you wish. Thanks again for your help. -- Jon SchutzEmail

[l2h] Re: Latex2HTML and Prettyref

2002-01-24 Thread Vladimir Klebanov
Hi, thanks a lot, Ross, for this quick course on hacking latex2html. The prettyref.perl code you provided was very educating. The question that remains (for me at least) is how can you add the hyperlinked section number? Can you please give us a clue? Vladimir > sub do_cmd_prettyref { >loc

[l2h] Re: Latex2HTML and Prettyref

2002-01-23 Thread Ross Moore
> > Dear Ross, > > I could do with a little bit of help. I've tried to help myself by > searching the latex2html mailling list archives, but I can't seem to > find a working server for them at the moment. > > I need an implementation of prettyref.sty for latex2html. I have come > up with a fa

[l2h] Re: latex2html

2001-12-10 Thread Ross Moore
> Hello, > > Thanks for the prompt response. I changed the temporary dirctory > as you suggested, it worked a step forward, but still had > problems. The script of the execution of latex2html > is attached below, could you take a look > again? It looks like I am one step away from getting the

Re: [l2h] Re: latex2html digest, Vol 1 #181 - 3 msgs

2001-10-29 Thread Ross Moore
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2001 22:29:43 +1100 (EST) Ross Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It may be that only 4 people were affected. > > Ross, > > No, I suspect there were plenty more. I certainly was too. > > I also tried to unsubscribe from the list and could not because control of > the list

Re: [l2h] Re: latex2html digest, Vol 1 #181 - 3 msgs

2001-10-29 Thread Wendy McKay
The spam mail attack has stopped but I also put a filter on Pine to autodelete messages coming from that address. -wendy == On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Ross Moore wrote: > Hi Joerg, > > > > I've just put a stop on email to you. > > > Please tell me whether t

Re: [l2h] Re: latex2html digest, Vol 1 #181 - 3 msgs

2001-10-29 Thread Ross Moore
Hi Joerg, > > I've just put a stop on email to you. > > Please tell me whether this stops it, or not. > > > Did not get any new ones yet... > > ...did you stop all l2h mails? To you, yes. But now Kaja has found 4 looping email processes, and is trying to find a fix to stop this happening aga

Re: [l2h] Re: latex2html digest, Vol 1 #181 - 3 msgs

2001-10-29 Thread Ross Moore
Hello everyone. > Is anything wrong... I keep receiving this message over and over again... one per >minute... Yes; evidently something *is* wrong... ... but I have no idea what it is. There have been very few reports of trouble so far. There has been trouble in the past with the Digest

Re: [l2h] Re: latex2html digest, Vol 1 #181 - 3 msgs

2001-10-29 Thread R. Sankaran
I too, it is serious - latex2html???/??? Joao Ferreira wrote: > Dear Sirs, > > I have received this message 500 times... is anything wrong... About one per >minute... I'm not kiding... it's true > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Send latex2html mailing list submiss

[l2h] Re: latex2html digest, Vol 1 #181 - 3 msgs

2001-10-29 Thread Joao Ferreira
Is anything wrong... I keep receiving this message over and over again... one per minute... [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Send latex2html mailing list submissions to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://tug.org/mailman/listinf

[l2h] Re: latex2html digest, Vol 1 #181 - 3 msgs

2001-10-29 Thread Joao Ferreira
Dear Sirs, I have received this message 500 times... is anything wrong... About one per minute... I'm not kiding... it's true [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Send latex2html mailing list submissions to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web

[l2h] Re: [latex2html-2K.1beta] ignore_commands

2001-10-26 Thread Ross Moore
> Hello Ross, > > > LaTeX2HTML finish with the line: > > > > 1; # must finish with a true value > > > > or similar. > > Yes it works fine like this ... I haven't seen it in the doc. Maybe > you should add it at least to the page explaining how to ignore > commands ... This applies to *

Re: [l2h] Re: latex2html black border problem with pngs.

2001-08-18 Thread Sangtian Liu
Dear Ross, I think many people using latex2html on redhat have this problem. I did some search for "netpbm" on redhad. The latest version on redhat is 9.9, or some thing like that. And I couldn't find LaTeX2HTML on redhat, instead I got dhl ( a sort of "A fast LaTeX to HTML translator.") I don't

Re: [l2h] Re: latex2html black border problem with pngs.

2001-08-18 Thread Sangtian Liu
Dear Ross, I think many people using latex2html on redhat have this problem. I did some search for "netpbm" on redhad. The latest version on redhat is 9.9, or some thing like that. And I couldn't find LaTeX2HTML on redhat, instead I got dhl ( a sort of "A fast LaTeX to HTML translator.") I don't

[l2h] Re: latex2html black border problem with pngs.

2001-08-18 Thread Ross Moore
Hello Aaron, > Check out http://64.67.211.144:88/test/test/ to see this problem. Any idea why > the png's might be generated with borders like that? Using latex2html v. 1.48. The particular piece of software which is either defective, or not installed correctly is called: pnmcrop . This is

[l2h] Re: latex2html Runaway argument?

2001-06-04 Thread Ross Moore
> Hi, > > I came across your messages while doing a search to find a solution to > a latex2html image problem that results in the messages: > > ! Argument of \Gin@iii has an extra }. > > \par > l.148 \lthtmlcheckvsize\clearpage} > > I've run across a }' that doesn't seem to mat

[l2h] Re: LaTeX2html -- russian style for babel

2001-04-17 Thread Ross Moore
> Dear Dr. Ross Moore, > > As I have understood, you are the primary LaTeX2html developer. I am using > this powerful program already about six years. Not long ago I have tried the > most recent version, latex2html-2K.1beta and found there a lot of languages > supported via the babel mechanism. S

[l2h] Re: Latex2html-2K.1beta

2001-04-03 Thread Ross Moore
> I have just installed Latec2html-2K.1beta. > I am having difficulties getting images created. > > Converting image #1 > pstoimg: Error: "/usr/bin/pnmcrop < /tmp/l2h9271/p9287.pnm | /usr/bin/pnmcrop -bot | >/usr/bin/pnmcrop -edge | /usr/bin/pnmcrop -edge | /usr/bin/pnmcrop -edge | >/usr

[l2h] Re: LaTeX2html installation problem, pnmtogif

2001-03-24 Thread Ross Moore
> Hi Ross > > It's me again with another thing I like to ask you, this time about the > installation of L2H. During the 'configure' run and the checking of the > needed netpbm tools I'm getting an error mesage from the checking of > pnmtogif (i hope that's the right name) that states that it did

[l2h] Re: LaTeX2html \fbox problem

2001-03-22 Thread Ross Moore
> > Dear Ross Moore > > > > I have a problem with L2H 2k1 version and \fbox -ed text. It will convert > > only some of them into images and others it doesnt, like > > > > \centerline{\fbox{foobar}} > > > The problem is with the LaTeX coding for \fbox . > > The width of the frame is not inc

Re: [l2h] Re: latex2html: Re: 96.1-h: optional argument to\pagebreak and \linebreak mishandled

2000-08-25 Thread Prof. Jerry Place
If you need this in your LaTeX document, include it in a \latexonly{..} environment. Conditional spacing really doesn't make much sense in HTML. \latexonly{..} work very well for me in latex2html. -- Jerry Place

[l2h] Re: latex2html: Re: 96.1-h: optional argument to \pagebreak and\linebreak mishandled

2000-08-25 Thread Wolfgang Slany
On Mon, 02 Jun 1997 17:28:59 EDT, Stephen Gildea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The following two forms are not handled correctly by latex2html: > > \linebreak[3] > \pagebreak[3] > > In the first case, the "[3]" will be included in the document. > > A \linebreak with an argument less than 4 shoul

[l2h] Re: [latex2html: manual sectioning]

1999-12-13 Thread Jens Lippmann
Matthias Georg Imhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been looking all over: is there a way to do the sectioning manually? > I have a document which contains a few very short sections. Instead of having > them on separate html pages, I would rather have them all on the same html > page.

[l2h] Re: latex2html bibliography

1999-08-29 Thread Ross MOORE
> Aug 28 > > Hi. I'm having a problem with latex2html v.98.1 (under linux). I cannot > get it to produce my bibliography. The citations appear as [#!label!#], > where label is what I put in the bibitem. In the Bibliography section, > only the number 2 appears at the bottom of the html file ins

[l2h] Re: latex2html: frames, layout comments

1999-05-25 Thread Chris Fox
A cannot get the sub frame_naviation_panel definition in the .init file to work either. I need this to work so that I can remove a redundant `content' button (I want the content frame displayed at all times). I have not seen a fix on the list. Playing around a bit, in the version of Perl I

[l2h] Re: latex2html: Frames implemented for HTML 4.0

1999-04-19 Thread Ross MOORE
> JT> I love the frames. Too bad they're so slow to display... > >They take a full 12 seconds to display on my pathetic R4400 SGI at >work using Netscape 4.08 or 4.51. Yeah, but I can't do much about that. The problem is that each new page means that as many as 7 HTML files have to be read !!

Re: [l2h] Re: latex2html: Frames implemented for HTML 4.0

1999-04-19 Thread Uli Wortmann
Hi Ross, Ross> Yeah, but I can't do much about that. The problem is that Ross> each new page means that as many as 7 HTML files have to be Ross> read !! Ross> If anyone can devise a simpler scheme, then I'd love to hear Ross> about it. I know you don't like the idea, but pu

Re: [l2h] Re: latex2html: Frames implemented for HTML 4.0

1999-04-16 Thread John Turner
I wrote: JT> I love the frames. Too bad they're so slow to display... They take a full 12 seconds to display on my pathetic R4400 SGI at work using Netscape 4.08 or 4.51. At home, on a 400 MHz PII running NT, the same page displays in a second or two using MS IE 5.0, a little slower using Nets

[l2h] Re: latex2html: links in headings

1999-04-16 Thread Steffen Klupsch
Ross MOORE wrote: > This seems to be a similar request to one made recently, > for a command \htmladdTOCentry {}{} I found code for the \htmladdTOCentry code in latex2html 99.1, but doesn't work as I expected. The command is ignored in the dvi version as well as in the html output. A sample fi

Re: [l2h] Re: latex2html: Frames implemented for HTML 4.0

1999-04-15 Thread Uli Wortmann
John> I love the frames. Too bad they're so slow to display... maybe you should try lynx ;-) uli -- Uli Wortmann Dept. of Geology Fax (Switzerland) (1) 632 1080 ETH-ZuerichFon3694 Visit the SPOC-team at http://

Re: [l2h] Re: latex2html: Frames implemented for HTML 4.0

1999-04-15 Thread John Turner
> "UW" == Uli Wortmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: UW> Works like expected on NS 4.04 and NS2.02. Maybe it's a browser UW> problem? Try www.spoc.ethz.ch, which works fine with IE, all NS on UW> macs and NS using unix, nt, and w95. Wow. You're right. I downloaded 4.08 and it displays fine.

Re: [l2h] Re: latex2html: Frames implemented for HTML 4.0

1999-04-15 Thread Uli Wortmann
John> o go to http://www-texdev.mpce.mq.edu.au/TURNER/report/ o John> click on the Contents button (not the link, the button) o John> click on Bar in the left (contents) frame Works like expected on NS 4.04 and NS2.02. Maybe it's a browser problem? Try www.spoc.ethz.ch, which works f

[l2h] Re: latex2html: Frames implemented for HTML 4.0

1999-04-14 Thread John Turner
[sorry Ross, you'll get a duplicate, because I sent the orig to the old list address...] > "RM" == Ross Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: RM> Building on earlier work by Martin Wilck and myself, RM> the frames.perl package has now been updated for HTML 4.0 RM> and LaTeX2HTML v98.2 . RM> R

[l2h] Re: latex2html: Another strange alltt related bug

1999-03-26 Thread Graham Gough
Ross, The alltt-related bug which I reported some time ago appears to have been fixed in 99.1 as you promised, for which thanks. However it appears to have popped up again in a different guise. The following document works fine if the use of the douput environment is uncommented but commenting