On 11/22/2012 04:47 PM, Robin Fairbairns wrote:
>> Now I wonder if I should use this as the new official "upstream" version
>> to be built upon from now on? There are some doubts that I collected in
>> the above Debian bug report.
>
> the author of this revision merely said "fix warnings in perl 5
Hi,
at Debian, we found that there is
http://mirrors.ctan.org/support/latex2html/latex2html-2012.tgz
which wasn't announced as an official new release. See also
http://bugs.debian.org/647433
Now I wonder if I should use this as the new official "upstream" version
to be built upon from now on?
Hi!
I'm forwarding two suggestions by a Latex2HTML user.
Thanks for considering.
Roland
--- Begin Message ---
Hello Roland,
I've tried to contact the author referenced in the man page. Since I've got a
mailer daemon, I guess that his mail address has changed. Can you please forward
it to him or
Hi,
at Debian, I just got the following request:
http://bugs.debian.org/647433
There is an "unofficial 2009" version issued by someone at Stanford. Can
we please coordinate what to do about it? Did they first try to contact
the mailing list?
Further, a new official release, including updates (m
Hi,
I'm still maintaining the latex2html package in Debian :-) and would
like to give something back. :-)
At http://packages.debian.org/source/sid/latex2html , you will always
find a file called latex2html*.debian.tar.gz which includes Debian's
adjustments to the original latex2html package.
Sin
Hi Ross,
thanks for your thoughts.
I solved the problem (packaging latex2html for Debian) by adding correct
IMAGE_TYPE(S) settings at build-time (without already having latex2html
installed).
Roland
Ross Moore wrote:
Hi Roland,
On 02/07/2009, at 6:21 AM, Roland Stigge wrote:
Hi
Hi,
building the Latex2HTML manual, I get:
make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/latex2html-2008/docs'
../latex2html -test_mode -no_math -html_version 4.0,math,frame
-accent_images textrm -scalable_fonts -short_index -split 4 -link 5
-no_auto_link -t "LaTeX2HTML" manual.tex;
$* is no longe
Hi Ross,
thanks for your reply.
Ross Moore wrote:
> By pre-testing with LaTeX before running a LaTeX2HTML job,
> the error will be detected.
>
> This has always been the recommended way to use LaTeX2HTML,
> and indeed is a *requirement* when there are symbolic links
> and/or figure-captions that
Hi,
I'm forwarding a problem of a Debian user. Maybe interesting for you...
Thanks.
bye,
Roland
--- Begin Message ---
Package: latex2html
Version: 2002-2-1-20050114-5
Severity: normal
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'
Hi,
greetings from Debian! Someone reported to us:
> latex creates typographic quotation marks (“”) from the ``'' input. It
> would be nice if latex2html would do the same if CHARSET=UTF-8 is set. I
> think that even using "" would be better than ``'' in the html code. It
> should also create a h
Hi,
a Debian user reported the following:
> if i convert the following code with latex2html, the output of the table
> does not look like expected (compared to output of pdflatex). the
> generated html table has severe syntax errors.
>
>
> \documentclass[austrian]{report}
> \usepackage[]{fonten
Hi Ross,
thanks for your comment!
Ross Moore wrote:
I'm attaching a mail that I got regarding a bug report I previously
forwarded to this forum. It includes two possible solutions to the
problem. To be consistent with the original latex2html, which one
will be included in the latex2html co
Hi,
I'm attaching a mail that I got regarding a bug report I previously
forwarded to this forum. It includes two possible solutions to the
problem. To be consistent with the original latex2html, which one will
be included in the latex2html codebase?
Thanks!
bye,
Roland
--- Begin Message -
Hi,
a Debian user reported the following:
When I invoke the program:
$ latex2html -info"" -numbered_footnotes foo.tex
it gives an html code with _all_ tables of the
document with double captions.
I have attached a sample
Hi,
what do you think about the attached problem+patch?
Thanks,
Roland
--
--- Begin Message ---
Package: latex2html
Version: 2002-2-1-8
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Hi,
When two or more instances of pstoimg, called with the -multipage option
and using the same temporary directory (/tmp by
Hi,
a Debian user reported the following:
==
Consider the following LaTeX code (typeset with amsart):
\def\refname{List of publications}
\begin{thebibliography}{X}
\bibitem{thesis}
...
Hi,
On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 01:21, Ross Moore wrote:
> This extended syntax *is* supported by LaTeX2HTML,
> when generating HTML for version 3.2 or 4.0.
He was using "-html_version '4.0,table'" together with the array
package. I can confirm that those seem to interfere somehow.
Just in case it's i
Hi,
On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 01:21, Ross Moore wrote:
> This extended syntax *is* supported by LaTeX2HTML,
> when generating HTML for version 3.2 or 4.0.
Sorry for the inconvenience; haven't checked that before forwarding it
blindly. Stupid me.
bye,
Roland
__
Hi,
FYI, a Debian user reported the problem described in the attachment.
See also http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=276037
Thanks for considering.
bye,
Roland
--- Begin Message ---
Package: latex2html
Version: 2002-2-1-8
Severity: wishlist
Could you please support the extended
Hi,
a Debian user reported the following wishlist "bug":
===
The option -multipage results in files ending with numbers. When
converting a document with more than 9 pages it results in:
doc1.png
doc2.png
...
doc10.png
A
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 12:37, Shigeharu TAKENO wrote:
> > What's the latest officially released version? I was always thinnking
> > that latex2html-2002-2-1.tar.gz, available from
> > http://www.latex2html.org/current/ is the latest released version.
>
> >From the manual of l2h (section 2.3):
>
>
Hi,
a Debian user sent in the following bug report with a patch:
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 12:24, Mazen NEIFER wrote:
> Package: latex2html
> Version: 2002-2-1-4
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
>
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: testing/unstable
> APT prefers unstable
> APT poli
Hi,
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 03:31, Shigeharu TAKENO wrote:
> > MISSING be845028fcda69bde9ea0db200500f7a latex2html-2002-2-1.tar.gz
> > NEW 444c53d1c23c16e1997c7673121f6280 latex2html-2002-2-1.tar.gz
> >
> > So I checked for reference here:
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/po
Hi Ross,
today I received the attached mail. It should be enough for the original
author (Nikos Drakos) and you, the maintainer, to decrease the
scrupulosity to change the license (else, please contact me or Roger
Hartley).
I'm looking forward for the next release of LaTeX2HTML (as the rest of
th
ts for using LaTeX
> to write a relicensing request letter to the copyright holders of
> LaTeX-related software. :)
Right. :) The current plain text version is:
==
Roland Stigge
Debian Developer
[address placeholder]
[EMAIL
2004-01-04:
% * Incorporated changes of Matt Black
% * Made name "University of Leeds" consistent
% * "Debian GNU/Linux" -> "Debian"
%
\documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{dinbrief}
\usepackage{verbatim}
\address{Roland Stigge\\
Debian Developer\\
\emph{address plac
Hi,
On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 00:21, Ross Moore wrote:
> Any further ideas would be welcome.
No real idea, but more problems. ;)
This very topic is one of the remaining open issues at Debian:
http://bugs.debian.org/75416
The others are:
http://bugs.debian.org/78161
http://bugs.debian.org/95
Hi Ross and Jens,
thanks for your replies.
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 15:49, Ross Moore wrote:
> > in a special section called "non-free" which doesn't mean that the
>
> ... but this is an unfortunate choice of designation...
Regard it as a traditional name, not as a discrimination of LaTeX2HTML.
Hi,
first, I want to thank everybody involved in our LaTeX2HTML integration
efforts for Debian and the licensing discussion. I'm maintaining the
Debian latex2html package now integrating it into the next Debian
release and we are looking forward to have LaTeX2HTML under a license
which we consider
.
It would be nice to have latex2html licensed under a free (in our sense)
license, e.g. the GPL. At least, free redistribution and modification
(and in turn, its redistribution) would be needed.
Thanks for considering.
Roland Stigge
Debian Project
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 20:36, Jens Lehmann wrote:
> >>We are not in agreement yet.
> > OK, I'm waiting for your decisions.
> Are there any news on the license issue?
I guess Ross is still asking / waiting for people to agree to the GPL
proposal. To speed things up a bit, I've got some additional po
tag 183372 pending
thanks
Hi Ross and Jens,
the Debian bug #183372 is obviously resolved by latex2html 2002-2-1 (you
possibly don't need to investigate further). I built a package which
should be uploaded to the Debian archive (sid) as soon as the licensing
issue (#204684) is resolved. You can al
Hi Ross,
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 18:43, Ross Moore wrote:
> If someone has just copied other people's software, and has not even
> provided installation routines, nor *anything at all* that adds value
> to the collection more than the sum of the free pieces, then he/she
> has no moral right to charg
Hi Ross,
thanks for your detailed mail.
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 04:12, Ross Moore wrote:
[The latex2html license, main part:]
> Use and copying of this software and the preparation of derivative
> works based on this software are permitted, so long as the following
> conditions are met:
>
> A The
On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 10:57, Torsten Bronger wrote:
> > It being at least _possible_ to charge $200 is exactly what Debian
> > requires from Free Software. Besides the GPL, please consider the
> > LPPL or any other free license approved at
> > http://www.opensource.org/licenses/.
>
> The LPPL isn'
Hello Ross,
thanks for your reply.
On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 02:29, Ross Moore wrote:
> Nikos has had nothing to do with the LaTeX2HTML software since
> 1996 or so.
> The license statement has not been changed since then.
I wonder if (and fear that) any change to it would be needed to be
supported b
Hi,
regarding the license issue, who's the current official maintainer of
latex2html and/or responsible for licensing issues?
I found different names:
Nikos Drakos (author mentioned in LICENSE)
Ross Moore (extended the package)
Marek Rouchal (also listed in docs)
John Turner (latex2html.org)
Unf
Hi Henk,
On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 15:27, Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE-NCC) wrote:
> > The difference is that many distributions are not sold just for a
> > nominal fee but for profit, like SuSE or RedHat.
>
> I still don't get it:
>
> * Debian considers the GPL a free license. The GPL allows people to
>
On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 15:05, Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE-NCC) wrote:
> > /usr/share/doc/latex2html/copyright (by Nikos Drakos):
> >
> > [...]
> > Use and copying of this software and the preparation of derivative
> > works based on
tions, not just
Debian.
Thanks for considering.
Roland Stigge
Debian Project
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=204684
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
latex2html mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
40 matches
Mail list logo
