Re: [l2h] Anything "new"?

>>To: Jean-Pierre Chretien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>cc: latex2html@tug.org >>Subject: Re: [l2h] Anything "new"? >>Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 10:02:26 +0100 >>From: Robin Fairbairns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>Jean-Pierre Chretien <[EMA

Re: [l2h] Anything "new"?

>>Systems Manager thinks that converting the files from LaTeX to PDF >>is still the best way to go ... files can easily be read/viewed without >>difficulty by all systems world-wide ... I see differences: - latex2html allows to split your document into small pages and to create thumbnail image

Re: [l2h] Anything "new"?

>>> >>> Simple and Easy instructions and examples are very much appreciated. >> >> latex2html >> >>See how it works out Trying it of the box on a big doc may get suprising results, and it will take time to build images if there are many formulas. I would suggest to try it out on a simplified r

Re: [l2h] latex2html and debian etch & texlive

>>Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:24:06 +0900 (JST) >>From: Shigeharu TAKENO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: latex2html@tug.org >>Subject: Re: [l2h] latex2html and debian etch & texlive >> >>shige 11/23 2006 >> >> >>Andres Lahe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> pnmtopng: can't open color names da

Re: [l2h] pstoimg conversion fail

>>Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 01:17:01 +0100 >>From: Pavel Sanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: latex2html@tug.org >>Subject: Re: [l2h] pstoimg conversion fail >> >>> Which version of pstoimg are you using ? >>> Here with >>> pstoimg V2002-2-1 (Revision 1.19, Perl 5.006001) >>> all is OK. >> >>hmm. >>my gent

Re: [l2h] pstoimg conversion fail

>>Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 16:24:29 +0100 >>From: Pavel Sanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: latex2html@tug.org >>Subject: [l2h] pstoimg conversion fail >> >>hello, >> >>having failed to find the maintainer of pstoimg, >>which is part of the latex2html, i send it here... >> >> >>pstoimg fails to convert c

Re: [l2h] Improved images in LaTeX2html

>>From: "Sergej V. Znamenskij" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: latex2html@tug.org >>Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2006 15:00:48 +0400 >>Subject: [l2h] Improved images in LaTeX2html >> >>Dear latex2html friends! >> >>I have done some useful (AFAICS) changes to latex2html code: >> * dvips+ImageMagick is replaced t

Re: [l2h] Another take on the 'no images' problem

>>From: Ross Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 17:06:47 +1000 >>To: Robin Fairbairns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>X-Brightmail-Tracker: AQQ= >>X-Whitelist: TRUE >>Cc: latex2html@tug.org >>Subject: Re: [l2h] Another take on the 'no images' problem >> >>Hi Robin, and others. >> >>On

[l2h] Spaces in PATH on Windows

Hello, Due to the efforts of the developers, LyX can be installed in the Program Files dir, and the installer defaults to this choice. I'm going to add a warning in the LyX wiki about the fact that it should rather be installed in a directory without spaces in the path if use of latex2html is

Re: [l2h] Resending...

>>> On 4/5/06, Ross Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Can you post an example of the LaTeX source for this. I don't know how LYX handles hyperlinks, so there is probably just a simple definition required so that LaTeX2HTML will know what is intended. >>> >>> Yes. I can. :) >>

Re: [l2h] html.sty ans harvard.sty

Hello, I'm getting into trouble when I try to compile ifacsam.tex (+ifacsam.bib) http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/nonfree/macros/latex/contrib/ifacmtg/ on the recent TeXLive-2005 TUG distribution. Compilation fails with error messages during the .bbl file compilation. This seems due to html.sty w

[l2h] Spaces in filenames

Hello, Reffering to message: http://tug.org/pipermail/latex2html/2006-February/003110.html are there plans to make l2h work with spaces in filenames ? Is there a hack to make Perl work with these ? TIA -- Jean-Pierre ___ latex2html mailing list late

Re: [l2h] character encoding not correctly detected by brwosers

For me it is quite strange that a browser chooses to use the encoding defined by the server and ignore the encoding defined by the HTML !?! I'm not an internet expert... do you have any comments on this... for me to understand ? >> >>IMHO it's a browser bug, as the browser opti

Re: [l2h] character encoding not correctly detected by brwosers

>>Subject: Re: [l2h] character encoding not correctly detected by brwosers >>From: Joao Miguel Ferreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: Jean-Pierre Chretien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Cc: latex2html@tug.org >>Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 15:39:30 + >> >>

Re: [l2h] character encoding not correctly detected by brwosers

>>From: Joao Miguel Ferreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: latex2html@tug.org >>Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 13:21:51 + >>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Feb 2006 13:27:55.0171 (UTC) >>FILETIME=[4DA61730:01C62BEA] >>Subject: [l2h] character encoding not correctly detected by brwosers >> >>Hello all at l2h, >

Re: [l2h] Latex2html for windows.

>>From: "jvictor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: >>Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 14:55:38 -0200 >>Subject: [l2h] Latex2html for windows. >> >>Dears friend, >>Work with Lyx1.3.7/Miktex/Windows XP. >> 1)Como to install latex2html to work with the Lyx? I assume you used the LyxWinInstaller. The l2h install mu

[l2h] PNG transparency again

Hello, I know this has been discussed already, but I really don't understand what controls image transparency. This image has a grey background: AFPL Ghostscript 8.51 (2005-04-18) Copyright (C) 2005 artofcode LLC, Benicia, CA. All rights reserved. This software comes with NO WARRANTY: see the f

RE: [l2h] How do I uninstall and upgrade LaTeX2HTML?

Hello, Would you mind to post in plain text and without attachments in this list ? Otherwise you make answering difficult for people using textual mail readers (and so you might get no answer at all) and you interfere with the threading look of the archive. TIA -- Jean-Pierre ___

Re: [l2h] One old problem with Mozilla solved

>>Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 20:48:17 +0200 >>From: Daniel Clemente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: latex2html@tug.org >>Subject: [l2h] One old problem with Mozilla solved >> >> Hi, >> >> I am happy to announce that the problem of the "images with large >>margins" in inline formulas should not appear mor

Re: [l2h] gray background for some images

>>Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 15:48:07 +0100 >>From: Stefan Funck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: Jean-Pierre Chretien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>CC: latex2html@tug.org >>Subject: Re: [l2h] gray background for some images >> >>Hello Jean-Pierre, >> >

Re: [l2h] gray background for some images

[...] >>$E_{\text{Bayes}}$ $E_{\textrm{Bayes}}$ gives the correct result, and *is* the current correct syntax to get roman fonts in math. As for the picture, I always use xfig to do such things, so I don't know what happens in a picture env. On Netscape 4.8/Solaris, png transparency is not ava

Re: [l2h] Rotated PS figures messed up.

>>From: Ross Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Subject: Re: [l2h] Rotated PS figures messed up. >>Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 06:25:55 +1100 >>To: Anil Dosaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>X-DAIMI-Spam-Score: -100 () USER_IN_WHITELIST >>X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.44 >>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>Hi Anil, >> >>On 04/12/