[l2h] Re: Latex2Html Bug & Fixing

2002-09-27 Thread Ross Moore
Hello Stephan, > Hello Ross, > > I'm using latex2html version 2002 1.67 on a window2K platform and no > images are included. config.bat has problems with > determining the dvips version. I edited the config/config.pl file and > changes the paramter '--version' into '-version'. > After that it w

Re: [l2h] Image conversion problem

2002-09-27 Thread Les Richardson
Hi John, A couple of questions: 1) Are all of the images .ps files or is this the first one? (ie. why is it doing all the other ones ok and not this one.) 2) What kind of OS do you run? Les Richardson On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, John Helge Herland wrote: > Hello, all > I have a big sectioned docum

[l2h] Image conversion problem

2002-09-27 Thread John Helge Herland
Hello, all I have a big sectioned document. Then I run latex2html it converts the document as I will, but I get problems with the images. I have a total of about 140 images and l2h converts the first 37 just as it should. But img38 doesn't get converted correctly. It is the file oppdragO.ps in the

[l2h] latex2html checksum mismatch

2002-09-27 Thread Jan Schaumann
Hello, I'm writing to you to inform you that some of the software that is offered on http://saftsack.fs.uni-bayreuth.de/~latex2ht/current/ appears to have changed even though no version number was increased or any other official change was indicated. The file latex2html-2002-2.tar.gz no longer m

Re: [l2h] Width & Height of GIF images creating problems with IE

2002-09-27 Thread Bruce Miller
Alex W Twisleton-Wykeham-Fiennes wrote: [...] > \includegraphics[ width=0.75\columnwidth, > keepaspectratio]{zones.gif} > > the file zones.gif is in the same directory as the .tex file. Hmm, worked for me. I rechecked after installing 2002-2 to make sure, and it still works [*]. BTW: it won

Re: [l2h] Width & Height of GIF images creating problems with IE

2002-09-27 Thread Bruce Miller
Ross Moore wrote: > Hi Bruce, Hi Ross! >>BTW: it wont actually recognize things like \columnwidth >>I was already going out on a limb enough, interpretting points, etc, >> but what columnwidth would be appropriate for a user's browser? >> Would you want/expect width="75%" here ? Is that worth