Re: [l2h] Re: Guillemets and OE

1999-09-09 Thread Robin Fairbairns
> Yes, the guillemets are in Latin-1 and other charsets, > including Latin-9. > > It is the \oe and \OE that are not, but are now in Latin-9. it's all very odd. particularly since afnor (the french standards organisation) held the secretariat and chair of the relevant subcommittee of iso tc97 (

Re: [l2h] Re: Guillemets and OE

1999-09-09 Thread Ross Moore
> On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, Ross Moore wrote: > > > > How are they coded in LaTeX? It should be fairly easy to provide an > > > appropriate conversion as they are part of the ISO-Latin-1 character set. > > > Ross? > > > > No, they are not in Latin-1; that's the whole problem. > > RU sure? See http://

[l2h] Shadow border on inlined images

1999-09-09 Thread Andreas Nygren
Hi ! I'm trying to run latex2html on some documnet, and encounter one main problem. All the images created inline from mathematical symbols have a shadow border in the left bottom corner of the created image. Any idea how i get rid of this ? An other problem is also that two minipage section in

[l2h] background in table

1999-09-09 Thread François Patte
Bonjour, Is there a way to get attributes in table tag, in the html file from a latex file, i.e.: I want to obtain: from tabular environment in the latex file. Thank you. -- François Patte. UFR de mathématiques et informatique. 45 rue des St Pères. 75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tel: 01 44 55 35 59 --

[l2h] Re: Guillemets and OE

1999-09-09 Thread Marek Rouchal DAT CAD HW Tel 25849
On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, Ross Moore wrote: > > How are they coded in LaTeX? It should be fairly easy to provide an > > appropriate conversion as they are part of the ISO-Latin-1 character set. > > Ross? > > No, they are not in Latin-1; that's the whole problem. RU sure? See http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-

[l2h] Re: Guillemets and OE

1999-09-09 Thread Ross Moore
> On Wed, 8 Sep 1999, taupin wrote: > > > 1. Is there now a means of making the << and >> be converted as French > > guillemets, as defined in EC fonts (at least as an option). I have 99.1. > > How are they coded in LaTeX? It should be fairly easy to provide an > appropriate conversion as they a