[LARTC] kazaaa is making me crazy!

2003-06-11 Thread mikee
> anorther thing..this rule just filter the initial download request..that > would be okay if oyu want filter completely, but if you want to slwo > down (i mean using tc/htb/fwmarks) you wouldnt be matching the hole > download, only the request... > >iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp -m --str

[LARTC] IMQ modification

2003-04-02 Thread mikee
>then you need to use NF_IP_PRI_FILTER < x < NF_IP_PRI_NAT_SRC, >for example NF_IP_PRI_FILTER + 1 or NF_IP_PRI_NAT_SRC - 1. >look into include/linux/netfilter_ipv4.h for a list of pre-defined values. > >Patrick thanks for your help, i only wonder if NF_IP_PRI_MANGLE+1 would be sufficient, since th

[LARTC] IMQ modification

2003-04-01 Thread mikee
x27;d like to use imq to shape traffic before SNAT changes source, and after filter rules applies) Regards mikee __ ignore ads below this line Serwis www.logo.hoga.pl - sciÄ…gaj bajery na telefony Nokia, Siemens, Alcatel, Ericsson, Motorola,Sa

Re: RE: [LARTC] Per-connection routing for multiple uplinks/providers ??

2002-04-29 Thread mikee
3 different IP), so nth packet marking isn't enough - all outgoing packets belonging to connection must be sent through same link to have uniform "external" ip regards, mikee __ ignore ads below this line - zr

Re: [LARTC] Per-connection routing for multiple uplinks/providers ??

2002-04-28 Thread mikee
's problem with connmark's mark - it doesn't work with mark-based routing, but MARK module works so packets can be marked with CONNMARK and then with MARK so thar routing works) mikee __ ignore ads below this line --