Re: [LARTC] (no subject)

On Thursday 25 July 2002 04:31, Alfred Quah wrote: > Hi, > I'm currently doing some test on HTB and realised that cburst is a very > important parameter that will shapes the throughput of the traffic. Also I > realise that if all the traffic are given the same priority in HTB, there > is a lot of

[LARTC] linux NETWORKING diagram ?

Hi. You wrote: > OK. I've made the diagram in Dia (attached). U can easly export it in any format > (any linux distro have Dia, i think)... Could you post your diagram in ascii? > I made some changes may be they are wrong, pls correct me... I thought that all > "mangle" and "nat" stuff sho

[LARTC] (no subject)

Hi, I'm currently doing some test on HTB and realised that cburst is a very important parameter that will shapes the throughput of the traffic. Also I realise that if all the traffic are given the same priority in HTB, there is a lot of pertubations in the bandwidth consumed by each traffic. As

[LARTC] Changing the QoS for a given flow

Title: Message Hi everyone,   I am trying to set-up a scenario wherein a given traffic flow gets certain QoS to begin with, and then is moved to another QoS class. Using Linux RH7.0 kernel 2.2.16. I tried doing this using the "tc filter change" and "tc filter replace" commands, but both

[LARTC] Matching packet size

Hi, In the ACK-matching example in the LARTC-HOWTO there is a line to match all packets smaller than 64 bytes ("match u16 0x 0xffc0 at 2"). This sounds logical for Ethernet-devices, but what if I use a PPP-device (as it is shown in the example)? The Frame-Header of PPP is significant smaller

Re: [LARTC] failover problems

Hello, On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Tobias Geiger wrote: > Yes. i used 2.4.19pre-10 kernel. > This behaviour affects only ppp-devices (never tried ippp but i guess it's > the same) > > i also wondered, why failover doesn't work when using different > route-entries for each nexthop...

Re: [LARTC] LARTC digest, Vol 1 #689 - 13 msgs (fwd)

> > guess it's a small bug in the patch for tcng. > > I thought that it is required: > tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 2:0 parent 1:0 htb default 5 r2q 100 > ~~~ The default parameter is not required for htb. I have only experience in creating htb s

Re: [LARTC] failover problems

> > Hello, > > On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Tobias Geiger wrote: > >> to be precisly: the problem is i have several nexthops (e.g. ppp0 >> +eth1 +eth2) for the same route and this WHOLE Route is deleted, >> although only the ppp0-device dissapears... >> and i cannot add several entries in differe

[LARTC] URGENT REQUEST AND HELP REQUIRED

hi, > > i am working on the diffserv implementation in linux. > i am new to this work and first time i am working on red hat along > with diffserv tech. > > i hav

[LARTC] TC bug? Mixing u32 and FW filters.

I've noticed some strange behaivour in tc and can't seem to find a definate "this is a bug" or "this is not a bug". Figured I'd ask the list. I'm using HTB2 and HTB3, on different machines. This happened on both of them. I've created a few different classes and quite a few filters. All of