Tests for .po files

2014-01-21 Thread Pedro Albuquerque
Hi, I've implemented the new orthographic agreement, as required to comply with the law. But now I have problems: * English and Portuguese share several common words, some of them used in the variables id and the "#:" section of the strings (vectorize, actualize,etc). Those common words

Re: Tests for .po files

2014-01-21 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 1/21/14 10:01 AM, Pedro Albuquerque wrote: > Hi, > I've implemented the new orthographic agreement, as required to comply > with the law. But now I have problems: > > * English and Portuguese share several common words, some of them used >in the variables id and the "#:" section of the str

Re: Hindi translation: ready for testing?

2014-01-21 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 1/19/14 1:20 AM, Nityanand Sharma wrote: > When can I expect Hindi to be copied from > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/trunk/extras/l10n/source/ > Sorry for the delay, I have updated the translation file for Hindi on trunk and it will be part of the next snapshot. Juergen > > >

Re: Tests for .po files

2014-01-21 Thread Pedro Albuquerque
Em 21/01/2014 12:03, Jürgen Schmidt escreveu: On 1/21/14 10:01 AM, Pedro Albuquerque wrote: Hi, I've implemented the new orthographic agreement, as required to comply with the law. But now I have problems: * English and Portuguese share several common words, some of them used in the varia

Re: Tests for .po files

2014-01-21 Thread Aivaras Stepukonis
2014.01.21 14:03, Jürgen Schmidt rašė: On 1/21/14 10:01 AM, Pedro Albuquerque wrote: Hi, I've implemented the new orthographic agreement, as required to comply with the law. But now I have problems: * English and Portuguese share several common words, some of them used in the variables i

Re: Tests for .po files

2014-01-21 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 1/21/14 2:23 PM, Aivaras Stepukonis wrote: > > 2014.01.21 14:03, Jürgen Schmidt rašė: >> On 1/21/14 10:01 AM, Pedro Albuquerque wrote: >>> Hi, >>> I've implemented the new orthographic agreement, as required to comply >>> with the law. But now I have problems: >>> >>> * English and Portuguese

Re: Tests for .po files

2014-01-21 Thread Aivaras Stepukonis
2014.01.21 15:50, Jürgen Schmidt rašė: On 1/21/14 2:23 PM, Aivaras Stepukonis wrote: 2014.01.21 14:03, Jürgen Schmidt rašė: On 1/21/14 10:01 AM, Pedro Albuquerque wrote: Hi, I've implemented the new orthographic agreement, as required to comply with the law. But now I have problems: * Eng

Re: Tests for .po files

2014-01-21 Thread jan i
On 21 January 2014 15:05, Aivaras Stepukonis wrote: > > 2014.01.21 15:50, Jürgen Schmidt rašė: > > On 1/21/14 2:23 PM, Aivaras Stepukonis wrote: >> >>> 2014.01.21 14:03, Jürgen Schmidt rašė: >>> On 1/21/14 10:01 AM, Pedro Albuquerque wrote: > Hi, > I've implemented the new orth

Re: Tests for .po files

2014-01-21 Thread Aivaras Stepukonis
2014.01.21 17:11, jan i rašė: On 21 January 2014 15:05, Aivaras Stepukonis wrote: 2014.01.21 15:50, Jürgen Schmidt rašė: On 1/21/14 2:23 PM, Aivaras Stepukonis wrote: 2014.01.21 14:03, Jürgen Schmidt rašė: On 1/21/14 10:01 AM, Pedro Albuquerque wrote: Hi, I've implemented the new orth

Pootle search AOO's vs LO's

2014-01-21 Thread T J
It seems to me that LibreOffice's Pootle server is a bit more inteligent than AOO's Pootle. For example, when you seach all for "Delete C~ells..." in LO's Pootle, you get 3 results in 1 page. With AOO's Pootle, you get 443 results. There're lots of Delete and other irrelevant words. Looks like A

Re: Pootle search AOO's vs LO's

2014-01-21 Thread jan i
On 22 January 2014 07:13, T J wrote: > It seems to me that LibreOffice's Pootle server is a bit more inteligent > than AOO's Pootle. For example, when you seach all for "Delete C~ells..." > in LO's Pootle, you get 3 results in 1 page. With AOO's Pootle, you get 443 > results. There're lots of Del