Hi,
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 04:37:57PM +0100, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
> Fridrich Strba schrieb:
>
> >If you've a bit of time, please give them a try & report bugs not yet in
> >bugzilla.
>
>
> I really would like to learn what the reason of that instruction
> might be. I can't see any advantage
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 02:56:39PM +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> I actually wonder why the Debian rules file needs to explicitly list
> the languages to be built, was it so that en-US is the first one as the
> comment above it says, or are there other reasons?
1) en-US has to be the first. at
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 01:29:22AM +0100, Michael Bauer wrote:
>The upcoming Ubuntu release reminded me of this - did this get resolved in
>the end?
What would be if you actually checked yourself?
http://packages.debian.org/libreoffice-l10n-gd
http://packages.ubuntu.com/libreoffice-l
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 10:14:59AM +0100, Michael Bauer wrote:
>In all the time I've been localizing, there wasn't a visible hint anywhere
>that I need to check *debian* to make sure that LO will be available on
>*ubuntu* in our language. . Add to that that I'm
Ignoring the fact (
