On 20/02/2023 21:39, Cristian Secară wrote:
Has anyone thought about i18n issues at the time of choosing this font?
Back when Vegar was chosen, the intersection of FLOSS license, and
pan-unicode fonts was aesthetically displeasing for every writing system
in use.
The situation today is aes
On 21/02/2023 07:48, Mike Saunders wrote:
Not at all, and clearly Vegur is lacking. Let's find a font that works
is many more scripts, and adapt the flyers accordingly...
Have branding guidelines for each writing system.
Each writing system has its own specific font family, with an ugly fall
În data de Tue, 21 Feb 2023 17:25:56 +, toki a scris:
> > Why not choose from SIL fonts ? Their i18n support is comprehensive
> > (and font quality is awesome).
>
> There is this little thing known as license incompatibility. Not all
> of the fonts that SIL distributes use the SIL Open Font
On 2/21/23 1:33 PM, Cristian Secară wrote:
În data de Tue, 21 Feb 2023 17:25:56 +, toki a scris:
Why not choose from SIL fonts ? Their i18n support is comprehensive
(and font quality is awesome).
Right, but – at least at first glance – their license looks permisive enough
[1]. One should
On 21/02/2023 18:44, Cristian Secară wrote:
I forgot this: what is the point in keeping something aesthetically pleasing, but restricted to 'Western' Latin languages only ?
Depending upon how one counts, between half and two thirds of the
languages in current use, that have been reduced to a
Mike Saunders schreef op 21.02.2023 08:48:
Hi Cristian, everyone,
On 20.02.23 22:39, Cristian Secară wrote:
Has anyone thought about i18n issues at the time of choosing this font
? A quick look at the embedded character set shows that this font
lacks support for Czech, Polish, Hungarian and
