[libreoffice-l10n] is a valid xml tag?

Hi, in the string jKbn9 in https://translations.documentfoundation.org/fr/libo_help/translate/scalc/guide.po#unit=108741441 there is a tag , if I keep this tag Pootle detects a "valid xml" error and if I remove it it detects an "xml tag" error which means, if I am not wrong, that my translation do

[libreoffice-l10n] Another invalid xml tag

Hi, According to Pootle, in the string buNWf in https://translations.documentfoundation.org/fr/libo_help/translate/sdraw.po#unit=29707700 there is an invalid xml tag. I guess it is Shouldn't it be changed in ? Best regards. JBF -- Seuls des formats ouverts peuvent assurer la pérennité de vos

[libreoffice-l10n] Pootle: how too manage the many false positives?

Hi, For example in the Help sbasic/shared.po, I have 432 critical errors but all involve placeholders and are probably false positive because Pootle see an error each time it see a % sign in a translated string. As an example: string wwiFk in https://translations.documentfoundation.org/fr/libo_he

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Another invalid xml tag

Le 31/07/2016 à 15:57, Martin Srebotnjak a écrit : > Hi, > no, that tag is self-closed, just as (for line break) in HTML, > that is why there is that / at the end of tag and it does not need > another tag for closing. In that case, there is a bug in Pootle which detects these self-closing tags as