Hi Jean-Baptiste,
On Sunday, 2012-01-15 07:34:09 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
> I think for fr_FR we need "D/M".
> Asked for other FR variants on discuss@fr ML.
Any news on that? If not, I'll just add D/M
Eike
--
LibreOffice Calc developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositioni
Hi Yury,
On Wednesday, 2012-01-18 09:24:42 +0200, Yury Tarasievich wrote:
> Of course, if the functionality is there, anyway, and has to be
> "fed" something, even such not-quite-intuitive forms will do.
It doesn't _have_ to be fed something, without a specific pattern only
input of a full date
Hi Niklas,
On Tuesday, 2012-01-17 11:09:57 +0100, Niklas Johansson wrote:
> [... time separator ...]
> Is it possible to accept both . and : as separators?
No, only one is possible.
> Common dateformats that LibreOffice doesn't support for Swedish include:
> D/M
> D/M
>
> EU-standard (not
Hi Aferkiw,
On Wednesday, 2012-01-18 00:05:58 +0100, Aferkiw N Tamazgha wrote:
> I don't understand ...
>
> What I need to change for kab_DZ
kab-DZ uses DD/MM/ as edit date format, so D/M/Y is generated as
date acceptance pattern. If additionally the input of incomplete dates,
consisti
On 01/18/2012 03:50 PM, Eike Rathke wrote:
...
But it would be ever so better to have a possibility for computer to
not second-guess at all, as such guesses might even be culturally
irrelevant.
... I'm confused now, does be-BY want incomplete date patterns, yes or
no?
Yes. Sorry.
And also it
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi Cheng-Chia,
>
> On Tuesday, 2012-01-17 12:22:17 +0800, Cheng-Chia Tseng wrote:
>
>> For zh-TW, full date patterns are:
>> Y-M-D
>> Y/M/D
>> Y.M.D
>
> Y-M-D is the always accepted ISO 8601 pattern, and Y/M/D is already
> generated from Forma
Hi Eike
[... time separator ...]
Is it possible to accept both . and : as separators?
No, only one is possible.
OK, good to know.
EU-standard (not seen that often but since were in the EU and all EU
documents ,
use this format it would be a good thing to support):
D.M
D.M.
Which standard
