Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-10 Thread Rimas Kudelis
2010.12.10 00:54, Martin Srebotnjak rašė: 2010/12/9 Rimas Kudelis: Again, I don't really have experience with corporate software installation, but I would guess that downloading the installer is not the biggest issue there. However, your suggestion to allow telling the installer to just download

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-09 Thread Martin Srebotnjak
2010/12/9 Rimas Kudelis : > Again, I don't really have experience with corporate software installation, > but I would guess that downloading the installer is not the biggest issue > there. However, your suggestion to allow telling the installer to just > download files for offline installation is a

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Rimas Kudelis
Hi Martin, 2010.12.09 00:24, Martin Srebotnjak rašė: 2010/12/8 Rimas Kudelis: Well, that would be annoying to download, for sure. But it's easy to solve by simply compressing all the files in a self-extracting archive (the way it's currently done). Then again, with online installation, you wou

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Martin Srebotnjak
2010/12/8 Rimas Kudelis : > Well, that would be annoying to download, for sure. But it's easy to solve > by simply compressing all the files in a self-extracting archive (the way > it's currently done). > > Then again, with online installation, you wouldn't have to download anything > but setup.exe

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Rimas Kudelis
2010.12.08 23:34, Martin Srebotnjak rašė: 2010/12/8 Rimas Kudelis: I don't quite get what you mean by "localized, single package" for all OS's. First of all, I tend to think that Windows and Mac should be somewhat prioritized (because Linux and all other Free OS's already come with OOo/LibO). Th

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Martin Srebotnjak
2010/12/8 Rimas Kudelis : > I don't quite get what you mean by "localized, single package" for all OS's. > First of all, I tend to think that Windows and Mac should be somewhat > prioritized (because Linux and all other Free OS's already come with > OOo/LibO). > Then also, if you plan a big corpora

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Rimas Kudelis
Hi Martin, please don't mess up the quoting order at least where it already exists. :P 2010.12.08 22:07, Martin Srebotnjak rašė: 2010/12/8 Rimas Kudelis: 2010.12.07 00:10, Michael Meeks rašė: One of the benefits of the combined installer is that we do not require many gigabytes of duplicated

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Martin Srebotnjak
I propose another way - smaller localization communities try to find server space for hosting their builds. Those builds wouldn't have to be hosted on all the mirrors, just on the continent ones of that country (I guess there are exemptions to that rule, like English, Spanish, French etc.). For Slo

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Rimas Kudelis
2010.12.07 00:10, Michael Meeks rašė: One of the benefits of the combined installer is that we do not require many gigabytes of duplicated pointlessness on -every- mirror site: as we duplicate all of the code again and again and again for windows, 90%+ of which is identical, but each time with

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-07 Thread Pau Iranzo
Hi, El dl 06 de 12 de 2010 a les 22:10 +, en/na Michael Meeks va escriure: > > > - no spellchecker is available when a inexistent grammar checker > > extension is provided, so a poor quality shown and again a new download > > to get. > > This sounds like a real bug; can you file it

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-06 Thread Martin Srebotnjak
2010/12/6 Michael Meeks : >        Well - we are looking again at how best to re-package it. The 'obvious' > solutions are not very pleasant ones though. So - with only ten > languages (all of my Catalan, Hungarian, friends start screaming) - > we can cover some huge proportion of our users, a