On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Andras Timar wrote:
> 2012/1/23 Mihkel Tõnnov :
> > 2012/1/23 Andras Timar
> >
> >> Release builds (RCs) don't have keyID langpacks. Only betas have them.
> >>
> >
> > It would be useful if they did, though -- at least for me, and I suppose
> > for Lior, and poss
2012/1/23 Andras Timar
> 2012/1/23 Mihkel Tõnnov :
> > 2012/1/23 Andras Timar
> >
> >> Release builds (RCs) don't have keyID langpacks. Only betas have them.
> >>
> >
> > It would be useful if they did, though -- at least for me, and I suppose
> > for Lior, and possibly others as well.
>
> It is
2012/1/23 Mihkel Tõnnov :
> 2012/1/23 Andras Timar
>
>> Release builds (RCs) don't have keyID langpacks. Only betas have them.
>>
>
> It would be useful if they did, though -- at least for me, and I suppose
> for Lior, and possibly others as well.
It is not set in stone, we can change it for 3.6.
2012/1/23 Andras Timar
> Release builds (RCs) don't have keyID langpacks. Only betas have them.
>
It would be useful if they did, though -- at least for me, and I suppose
for Lior, and possibly others as well.
(Frankly I don't really understand why have RC1 and RC2 at all if it's
planned that th
Release builds (RCs) don't have keyID langpacks. Only betas have them.
Andras
2012/1/23 Lior Kaplan :
> Just me or that keyID lang pack is missing ?
>
> Kaplan
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Thorsten Behrens
> Date: Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 9:00 PM
> Subject: [libreoffice-l10n]