bug-reports Fw: Fw: [libreoffice-l10n] YearFrac NOT IMPOWER function

2013-07-01 Thread Tom Davies
ple from their competition to expand on their triaging skills?  Regards from Tom :)  - Forwarded Message - >From: Sérgio Marques >To: Andras Timar >Cc: l10n@global.libreoffice.org >Sent: Friday, 28 June 2013, 14:35 >Subject: Re: Fw: [libreoffice-l10n] YearFrac

Re: Fw: [libreoffice-l10n] YearFrac NOT IMPOWER function

2013-06-28 Thread Sérgio Marques
2013/6/28 Andras Timar > On 06/28/2013 03:35 PM, Sérgio Marques wrote: > > Hi Andras, > > > > Can you add in that bug report that this also happens for Portuguese? > > > > I guess that this happens with all languages that use comma as decimal > > separator. > > > > > Hi Sergio, > > No need to add

Re: Fw: [libreoffice-l10n] YearFrac NOT IMPOWER function

2013-06-28 Thread Andras Timar
On 06/28/2013 03:35 PM, Sérgio Marques wrote: > Hi Andras, > > Can you add in that bug report that this also happens for Portuguese? > > I guess that this happens with all languages that use comma as decimal > separator. > > Hi Sergio, No need to add it, it comes without saying. snprintf at least

Re: Fw: [libreoffice-l10n] YearFrac NOT IMPOWER function

2013-06-28 Thread Sérgio Marques
Hi Andras, Can you add in that bug report that this also happens for Portuguese? I guess that this happens with all languages that use comma as decimal separator. Thanks 2013/6/28 Andras Timar > On 06/28/2013 01:20 PM, Mihovil Stanic wrote: > > > > Also, to whoom I can report that bug with no

Re: Fw: [libreoffice-l10n] YearFrac NOT IMPOWER function

2013-06-28 Thread Andras Timar
On 06/28/2013 01:20 PM, Mihovil Stanic wrote: > > Also, to whoom I can report that bug with not using "commas" in > complex numbers? Please report all bugs to Bugzilla. Reporting them to lists or developers is not efficient, mails can get lost. I reported this bug for you. https://bugs.freedesktop

Re: Fw: [libreoffice-l10n] YearFrac NOT IMPOWER function

2013-06-28 Thread Tom Davies
Mihovil Stanic >To: l10n@global.libreoffice.org >Sent: Friday, 28 June 2013, 12:20 >Subject: Re: Fw: [libreoffice-l10n] YearFrac NOT IMPOWER function > > > >Dana 28.6.2013. 13:12, Tom Davies je napisao: >> Hi :) >> Yes, if it's been wrong for 9 years then anothe

Re: Fw: [libreoffice-l10n] YearFrac NOT IMPOWER function

2013-06-28 Thread Mihovil Stanic
Dana 28.6.2013. 13:12, Tom Davies je napisao: Hi :) Yes, if it's been wrong for 9 years then another 1 month or so is unlikely to cause major problems. Fixing in Master sounds like the correction will automatically start to ripple out to everywhere it needs to be as soon as the freeze is ove

Re: Fw: [libreoffice-l10n] YearFrac NOT IMPOWER function

2013-06-28 Thread Tom Davies
to it.  So, that all sounds good Thanks and regards from Tom :)  > > From: Andras Timar >To: LibreOffice Localization >Sent: Friday, 28 June 2013, 11:12 >Subject: Re: Fw: [libreoffice-l10n] YearFrac NOT IMPOWER function > > >On 2013.0

Re: Fw: [libreoffice-l10n] YearFrac NOT IMPOWER function

2013-06-28 Thread Tom Davies
om: Andras Timar >To: LibreOffice Localization >Sent: Friday, 28 June 2013, 11:12 >Subject: Re: Fw: [libreoffice-l10n] YearFrac NOT IMPOWER function > > >On 2013.06.27. 17:09, Tom Davies wrote: >> Hi :) >> Ahhh, that's why this link is better >> http://docs.oas

Re: Fw: [libreoffice-l10n] YearFrac NOT IMPOWER function

2013-06-28 Thread Andras Timar
On 2013.06.27. 17:09, Tom Davies wrote: > Hi :) > Ahhh, that's why this link is better > http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.2/cs01/OpenDocument-v1.2-cs01-part2.html#YEARFRAC > > "YearFrac > Summary: Extracts the number of years (including fractional part) between two > dates" > Regards from > T

Re: Fw: [libreoffice-l10n] YearFrac NOT IMPOWER function

2013-06-27 Thread Tom Davies
___ > From: Mihovil Stanic >To: Tom Davies >Cc: "l10n@global.libreoffice.org" >Sent: Thursday, 27 June 2013, 15:49 >Subject: Re: Fw: [libreoffice-l10n] YearFrac NOT IMPOWER function > > >That is string from different function called EDATE. >Only ope

Re: Fw: [libreoffice-l10n] YearFrac NOT IMPOWER function

2013-06-27 Thread Mihovil Stanic
*From:* Mihovil Stanic *To:* l10n@global.libreoffice.org *Sent:* Thursday, 27 June 2013, 14:36 *Subject:* Re: Fw: [libreoffice-l10n] YearFrac NOT IMPOWER function Yes, it's about YEARFRAC , but I don't see that sentence there. YEARFRAC calculates tim

Re: Fw: [libreoffice-l10n] YearFrac NOT IMPOWER function

2013-06-27 Thread Tom Davies
meant to be useful. Regards from Tom > > From: Mihovil Stanic >To: l10n@global.libreoffice.org >Sent: Thursday, 27 June 2013, 14:36 >Subject: Re: Fw: [libreoffice-l10n] YearFrac NOT IMPOWER function > > >Yes, it's about YE

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] YearFrac NOT IMPOWER function

2013-06-27 Thread Tom Davies
n >Sent: Thursday, 27 June 2013, 14:20 >Subject: Fw: [libreoffice-l10n] YearFrac NOT IMPOWER function > > > >Hi :) >Sorry!  I think i should have broken my last response into a new thread.  We >were no longer talking about IMPOWER.  I think we had started talking about >Year

Re: Fw: [libreoffice-l10n] YearFrac NOT IMPOWER function

2013-06-27 Thread Mihovil Stanic
Yes, it's about YEARFRAC , but I don't see that sentence there. YEARFRAC calculates time in YEARS between 2 dates. So if you enter start date 1.1.2013 / end date 1.7.2013, result will be 0,5 years because there is exactly 6 month (0,5 year) betweent those dates. My report is for description of

Fw: [libreoffice-l10n] YearFrac NOT IMPOWER function

2013-06-27 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) Sorry!  I think i should have broken my last response into a new thread.  We were no longer talking about IMPOWER.  I think we had started talking about YearFrac instead.  Apols and regards from Tom :)  - Forwarded Message - >From: Tom Davies >To: Sérgio Marques ; Mihovil