Hi :)
I am fairly sure the Documentation Team is NOT up to doing this but
perhaps with a little help they might be? They wont be able to do any
of the coding, however easy it is, but the skeleton help-page sounds
like something they might be really good at. They recently got into
doing the wiki-F
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 17:19 +0100, Sophie wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This mail is posted to the dev list and the l10n list, please follow up
> on the l10n list.
>
> I would like to open a discussion on the l10n workflow, the quality of
> the en_US version and the Help files. All is linked and I would l
Thomas Hackert wrote:
>would this discussion not more suitable after the 4.2 release ;?
An en_US L10N team should have been created back when TDF was setting up LibOP.
Whilst waiting is always optional, by setting up something now, there is a
fairly good chance that the en_US version of LibO
Hi all
My grain of salt there. I strongly believe we need to cross-talk, so I go
on cross-posting.
Le Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:54:05 +0100, Sophie a
écrit:
Hi Andras, all,
Le 12/12/2013 11:18, Andras Timar a écrit :
On 2013.12.11. 17:19, Sophie wrote:
*About the en_US overall quality
Furt
Hi Christian,
Le 12/12/2013 13:56, Christian Lohmaier a écrit :
> Hi Sophie, *,
>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Sophie wrote:
>> [...]
>> *Before updating Pootle:
>> - it's important for l10n team to know the approx load of work that will
>> be needed to achieve the whole work. Time between
Hi Christian,
On 2013.12.12. 13:56, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> Yes, 4.2.0 was the first time I did update the projects in pootle, and
> I personally think it was not a huge desaster. There were two
> stumbling stones:
> 1) update_against_templates aborting because of added/renamed files
> 2) lots
Hi Sophie, *,
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Sophie wrote:
>[...]
> *Before updating Pootle:
> - it's important for l10n team to know the approx load of work that will
> be needed to achieve the whole work. Time between beta1 and rc1 is short
> and that will help to better organize this time be
Hi *,
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Sophie wrote:
> Le 11/12/2013 19:24, Thomas Hackert a écrit :
>> [...]
>> would this discussion not more suitable after the 4.2 release ;?
>
> Only answering your question: nope, because 4.3 is already on the radar,
> so that would be great to have something
Hi Andras, all,
Le 12/12/2013 11:18, Andras Timar a écrit :
> On 2013.12.11. 17:19, Sophie wrote:
>> *About the en_US overall quality
>> - the process to rely on the l10n team to fix the en_US version is ok,
>> even if it gives us extra work to understand what is meant before we
>> realized it's a
On 2013.12.12. 0:35, Robinson Tryon wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Sophie wrote:
>
>> *After RC1 and l10n integration
>> - we need to know when integration is made after our fixes, there is
>> currently no communication on this
>
> Perhaps documenting the process in some pages on the
Hi Robinson,
Le 12/12/2013 00:35, Robinson Tryon a écrit :
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Sophie wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This mail is posted to the dev list and the l10n list, please follow up
>> on the l10n list.
>>
>> I would like to open a discussion on the l10n workflow, the quality of
>>
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Sophie wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This mail is posted to the dev list and the l10n list, please follow up
> on the l10n list.
>
> I would like to open a discussion on the l10n workflow, the quality of
> the en_US version and the Help files. All is linked and I would lik
Le 11/12/2013 19:24, Thomas Hackert a écrit :
> Hello Sophie, *,
> On Mittwoch, 11. Dezember 2013 17:19 Sophie wrote:
>
>> I would like to open a discussion on the l10n workflow, the
>> quality of the en_US version and the Help files. All is linked and
>> I would like to discuss how we can improve
Hello Sophie, *,
On Mittwoch, 11. Dezember 2013 17:19 Sophie wrote:
> I would like to open a discussion on the l10n workflow, the
> quality of the en_US version and the Help files. All is linked and
> I would like to discuss how we can improve the process here. I'm
> sure that having a better unde
14 matches
Mail list logo
