Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Pulling translation from Pootle for local build

2017-01-19 Thread Khaled Hosny
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 08:11:17PM +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote: > Thanks Andras, much appreciated. > > Is there a shortcut to just rebuild the translation? I tried using > make build-l10n-only but it seems to cause lots of translation not to > show up. Actually it seems to be a problem with the fil

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Pulling translation from Pootle for local build

2017-01-19 Thread Khaled Hosny
Thanks Andras, much appreciated. Is there a shortcut to just rebuild the translation? I tried using make build-l10n-only but it seems to cause lots of translation not to show up. Regards, Khaled On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 04:20:49PM +0100, Andras Timar wrote: > Hi Khaled, > > Those comments are ha

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Pulling translation from Pootle for local build

2017-01-19 Thread Andras Timar
Hi Khaled, Those comments are harmless. We clean them before commit/push (to reduce file size?). There is no need to post-process po files before build. Best regards, Andras On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote: > I’m trying to test the latest Arabic translation on a local build

[libreoffice-l10n] Pulling translation from Pootle for local build

2017-01-19 Thread Khaled Hosny
I’m trying to test the latest Arabic translation on a local build from source, it is enough to download the PO files from Pootle and extract them to the translation/source/ar/, or are there any post-processing steps needed? I just did that and I see lots of comments like “#. eDUKr” in the files I g

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [Polish project] Transfer data from 5.2 to master branch

2017-01-19 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Mateusz, *, On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 8:50 PM, Mateusz Zasuwik wrote: > I see there are suggestions in master, which I accept or cancel in 5.2. Is > it how it works? Not sure what you you mean exactly. Maybe the same effect that was already discussed here, mainly pootle taking exact matches fro