2015-11-24 01:26+, Wu, Feng:
>> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com]
>> On 16/11/2015 20:03, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>> > 2015-11-09 10:46+0800, Feng Wu:
>> >> Use vector-hashing to handle lowest-priority interrupts for
>> >> posted-interrupts. As an example, modern Intel CPUs use this
2015-11-25 03:21+, Wu, Feng:
> From: Radim Krčmář [mailto:rkrc...@redhat.com]
>> The hash function just interprets a subset of vector's bits as a number
>> and uses that as a starting offset in a search for an enabled APIC
>> within the destination set?
>>
>> For example:
>> The x2APIC destina
2015-11-26 06:24+, Wu, Feng:
>> From: Radim Krčmář [mailto:rkrc...@redhat.com]
>> 2015-11-25 15:38+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
>>> On 25/11/2015 15:12, Radim Krcmár wrote:
>>>> I think it's ok to pick any algorithm we like. It's unlikely that
>>>
2015-12-10 01:52+, Wu, Feng:
>> From: Radim Krčmář [mailto:rkrc...@redhat.com]
>> (Physical xAPIC+x2APIC mode is still somewhat reasonable and xAPIC CPUs
>> start with LDR=0, which means that operating system doesn't need to
>> utilize mixed mode, as defined by KVM, when switching to x2APIC.)
