On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 09:12:55PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Josh Wilsdon wrote:
> >We are doing work with libvirt 0.6.3 through which we have started
> >virtual machines. Using the same "create" command with the same
> >storage, the same everything else this configuration works with both
>
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 04:50:25PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Federico Simoncelli wrote:
>
> >I've been working quite extensively with kvm on CentOS 5.3 lately.
> >If you are interested in the latest rpm of kvm-kmod-2.6.30-rc8,
> >qemu-kvm-0.10.5 and libvirt-0.6.4 you can temp
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:03:22AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>I'm not at all arguing against pci_addr. I'm arguing about how libvirt
> >>should use it with respect to the "genesis" use-case where libvirt has
> >>no specific reason to choose one PCI slot over
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 03:59:57PM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This one introduces a -maxcpus setting, allowing the user to specify
> the maximum number of vCPUs the system can have, as discussed with Gleb
> earlier in the week.
What is the maximum value for the 'maxcpus' setting for KVM
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 01:55:52PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
> > Here are two patches. One implements a virtio-serial device in qemu
> > and the other is the driver for a guest kernel.
>
> So I'll ask again. Why is this separate from virtio-console?
In the guest I wouldn't want virtio-serial devic
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 03:21:24PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
> > >>> The qcow block driver format is no longer maintained and likely
> > >>> contains
> > >>> serious data corruptors. Urge users to stay away for it, and advertise
> > >>> the new and improved replacement.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure how
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 11:12:44PM +0800, Zhang Qian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to know if virDomainSetSchedulerParameters() works for KVM
> domain, I want to set CPU weight for a KVM domain, is it possible?
> Thanks a lot!
The API you're asking about is not actually a KVM one, rather a libvirt
AP
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 06:31:23PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 06/20/2011 04:38 PM, Daniel Gollub wrote:
> >Introduce panic hypercall to enable the crashing guest to notify the
> >host. This enables the host to run some actions as soon a guest
> >crashed (kernel panic).
> >
> >This patch series i
From: "Daniel P. Berrange"
The default accelerator is hardcoded to 'kvm'. This is a fine
default for qemu-kvm normally, but if the user built with
./configure --disable-kvm, then the resulting binaries will
not work by default
* vl.c: Default to 'tcg' unless C
From: "Daniel P. Berrange"
The default accelerator is hardcoded to 'kvm'. This is a fine
default for qemu-kvm normally, but if the user built with
./configure --disable-kvm, then the resulting binaries will
not work by default
* vl.c: Default to 'tcg' unless CONFIG
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 03:52:19PM +1200, Derek wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I could not track down any solid info on modifying the DMI BIOS string.
>
> For example, in VirtualBox you can use 'vboxmanage setsextradata' to
> set the BIOS product and vendor string per VM.
>
> Any ideas if this is possib
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 08:23:11AM -0500, Corey Minyard wrote:
> I haven't heard anything about these patches. Any comments, good or
> bad? Has anyone tried these?
You really ought to post this to the qemu-devel mailing list,
since that's where the majority of QEMU developers hang out.
This KVM
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 03:21:32PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:43:01AM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> > We can know the guest is panicked when the guest runs on xen.
> > But we do not have such feature on kvm.
> >
> > Another purpose of this feature is: management app(
; > "NORMAL" : "NORMAL:+ANON-DH", NULL) < 0) {
> > gnutls_deinit(vs->tls.session);
> > vs->tls.session = NULL;
> > vnc_client_error(vs);
> > --
> > 1.7.6
>
> Daniel,
> This patch
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 04:04:41PM -0600, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> On September 27, 2011, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 09/27/2011 03:29 AM, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> > > I just noticed something interesting, a virtual machine on one of my
> > > servers seems to have 69 threads (including the main th
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 08:10:21PM +0200, Reeted wrote:
> I repost this, this time by also including the libvirt mailing list.
>
> Info on my libvirt: it's the version in Ubuntu 11.04 Natty which is
> 0.8.8-1ubuntu6.5 . I didn't recompile this one, while Kernel and
> qemu-kvm are vanilla and compi
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:19:43AM +0200, Reeted wrote:
> On 09/28/11 09:51, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>This is my bash commandline:
> >>
> >>/opt/qemu-kvm-0.14.1/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -M pc-0.14 -enable-kvm
> >>-m 2002 -smp 2,sockets=2,cores=1,threads=1
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:49:01AM +0200, Reeted wrote:
> On 09/28/11 11:28, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:19:43AM +0200, Reeted wrote:
> >>On 09/28/11 09:51, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>>>This is my bash commandline:
> >>>
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:19:09PM +0200, Reeted wrote:
> On 09/28/11 11:53, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:49:01AM +0200, Reeted wrote:
> >>YES!
> >>It's the vhost. With vhost=on it takes about 12 seconds more time to boot.
> >>
&
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 06:07:11PM -0300, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
> This is a first attempt at providing a libvirt VM class,
> in order to implement the needed methods for virt testing.
> With this class, we will be able to implement a libvirt
> test, that behaves similarly to the KVM test.
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:48:12AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Kevin Wolf writes:
>
> > Am 25.10.2011 16:06, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> >> On 10/25/2011 08:56 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >>> Am 25.10.2011 15:05, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> I'd be much more open to changing the default mode
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 01:23:05PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 26.10.2011 11:57, schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
> > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:48:12AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> Kevin Wolf writes:
> >>
> >>> Am 25.10.2011 16:06, schrieb Anthony
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:27:30PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> What does libvirt actually do in the monitor prior to migration
> completing on the destination? The least invasive way of doing
> delayed open of block devices is probably to make -incoming create a
> monitor and run a main loop b
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 01:11:42PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 11/10/2011 12:42 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:27:30PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >>What does libvirt actually do in the monitor prior to migration
> >>completing on
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:25:34PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 11/11/2011 12:15 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 10.11.2011 22:30, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> > > Live migration with qcow2 or any other image format is just not going to
> > > work
> > > right now even with proper clustered storage.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:24:22PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:16:10AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:25:34PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > On 11/11/2011 12:15 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > > Am 10.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:21:53PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 14.11.2011 12:08, schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:24:22PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:16:10AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>> On S
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 01:34:15PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:29:18AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:21:53PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > Am 14.11.2011 12:08, schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
> > > >
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 01:51:40PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:37:27AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 01:34:15PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:29:18AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wro
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 01:56:36PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:37:27AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 01:34:15PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:29:18AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wro
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:53:30AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 01/19/2011 03:48 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >On 01/18/11 18:09, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >>On 01/18/2011 10:56 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>>
> The device model topology is 100% a hidden architectural detail.
> >>>This is true f
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:54:10AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 01/19/2011 07:11 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >Gerd Hoffmann writes:
> >
> >>On 01/18/11 18:09, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >>>On 01/18/2011 10:56 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >The device model topology is 100% a hidden architectu
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:53:30AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 01/19/2011 03:48 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >On 01/18/11 18:09, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >>On 01/18/2011 10:56 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>>
> The device model topology is 100% a hidden architectural detail.
> >>>This is true f
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:51:58AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 01/19/2011 11:01 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >
> >The reason we specify 'bus' is that we wanted to be flexible wrt
> >upgrades of libvirt, without needing restarts of QEMU instances
> >
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:42:18AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 01/19/2011 11:35 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:53:30AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >>On 01/19/2011 03:48 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >>>On 01/18/11 18:09, Anthony
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 09:44:05AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >For (2), you cannot use bus=X,addr=Y because it makes assumptions about
> >the PCI topology which may change in newer -M pc's.
>
> Why should the PCI topology for 'pc' ever change?
>
> We'll probably get q35 support some
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 04:34:01PM +, James Neave wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to pass a NOVA-T-500 TV Tuner card through to a gust VM.
> I'm getting the error "The driver 'pci-stub' is occupying your device
> :08:06.2"
This is a rather misleading error message. It is *expected* that
pci-s
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:54:01AM +0100, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 02/10/2011 10:30 AM, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
> >Currently FdMigrationState doesn't support read(), and this patch
> >introduces it to get response from the other side.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Yoshiaki Tamura
>
> Migration is unidir
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 07:23:33PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
> 2011/2/10 Daniel P. Berrange :
> > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:54:01AM +0100, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >> On 02/10/2011 10:30 AM, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
> >> >Currently FdMigrationState doesn&#x
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:34:45PM +0100,
andreas.a...@de.transport.bombardier.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> sorry for the previous partial e-mail, I hit the send button accidentally
> ;-).
>
> I have a setup with a kvm-based virtual machine running a stock RedHat 6.1
> (yes, that old) on a rather
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:24:40AM -0600, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> Most of the examples for setting up the bridge interface on a VM host
> suggest assigning the IP address to the bridge. Assigning the IP to
> the bridge leaves you open to the MAC address of the bridge changing
> as you add/remove gue
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:06:06PM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Anthony Liguori (anth...@codemonkey.ws) wrote:
> > On 03/15/2011 09:53 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
> > > QAPI
>
> > >- c library implementation is critical to have unit tests and test
> > > driven development
> > > - thread safe?
>
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 05:46:28PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> From: Lai Jiangshan
> Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 17:05:15 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] qemu,qmp: add inject-nmi qmp command
>
> inject-nmi command injects an NMI on all CPUs of guest.
> It is only supported for x86 guest currently, it wi
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:22:37AM +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 04:59:51PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > On 11/29/2011 10:59 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > >On 11/29/2011 05:51 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> > >>How to do high level stuff?
> > >>- python?
> > >>
> > >
> > >One of th
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 07:56:58PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
> Hi, all
>
> This is a basic implementation of libvirt Native Linux KVM
> Tool driver. Note that this is just made with my own interest
> and spare time, it's not an endorsement/effort by Red Hat,
> and it isn't supported by Red Hat offi
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 07:57:00PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
> Which is named as "KVMTOOL_STATE_DIR", so that the user can
> configure the path of state directly as he wants.
> ---
> tools/kvm/main.c |7 ++-
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/kvm/main
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 07:57:04PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
> It's named as "kvmtool".
> ---
> src/conf/domain_conf.c |4 +++-
> src/conf/domain_conf.h |1 +
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/conf/domain_conf.c b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
> index 58f4d0f
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 07:57:01PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
> The document is rather rough now, but at least contains an domain
> config example of all the current supported XMLs, and tells how to
> play with the driver.
> ---
> docs/drivers.html.in|1 +
> docs/drvkvmtool.html.in | 87
>
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 07:57:02PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
> ---
> include/libvirt/virterror.h |1 +
> src/driver.h|1 +
> src/util/virterror.c|3 +++
> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/libvirt/virterror.h b/include/lib
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 07:57:03PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
> Just like QEMU and LXC, kvm driver intends to support running hook
> script before domain starting and after domain shutdown too.
> ---
> src/util/hooks.c | 11 ++-
> src/util/hooks.h |8
> 2 files changed, 18 ins
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 07:57:06PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
> Basically, the drivers is implemented by using kvm tool binary
> currently, (see ./kvm help for more info).
>
> Current implementation supports define/undefine, start/destroy/,
> suspend/resume, connect to guest console via "virsh conso
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 08:21:06AM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 14:38 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 07:56:58PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
> > > * KVM tool manages the network completely itself (with DHCP support?),
> > &
lt;>/dev/net/tap3
> >
> > Cc: Daniel P. Berrange
> > Cc: Osier Yang
> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin
>
> Daniel, Osier, I assume this is useful for libvirt?
Yes, this works.
I don't know if kvmtool supports the VNET_HDR extension yet, but if it
doe
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 07:16:22PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 11:55 -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> > So, about 2/3 of host speed now -- which is much better. Is 2/3 about
> > normal or should I be looking for more?
>
> aio=native
>
> Thats the qemu setting, I'm not sure
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 11:11:21AM +0100, Guido Winkelmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a spec-file somewhere for creating RPMs from the newest qemu-kvm
> release?
The current Fedora RPM specfiles are always a good bet to start off with:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=qemu.git;a=blob;f=
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:22:27AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-01-20 11:14, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 07:01:44PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> On 2012-01-19 18:53, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> What problems does it cause, and in which scenarios? Can't they be
>
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:13:48PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-01-20 11:25, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:22:27AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> On 2012-01-20 11:14, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 07:01:44PM +010
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 01:00:06PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-01-20 12:45, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:13:48PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> On 2012-01-20 11:25, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:2
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 01:51:20PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-01-20 13:42, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 01:00:06PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> On 2012-01-20 12:45, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:1
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 02:02:03PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-01-20 13:54, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 01:51:20PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> On 2012-01-20 13:42, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 01:0
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 08:44:14AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 05/15/2012 03:51 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >Currently we have a very simple unidirectional structure:
> >qemu is a standalone program that keeps running on its own. libvirt is
> >the user of qemu. Often enough it's already hard to
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 09:35:04AM -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:55:37 +0800
> Wen Congyang wrote:
>
> > >> +static void panicked_perform_action(void)
> > >> +{
> > >> +switch(panicked_action) {
> > >> +case PANICKED_REPORT:
> > >> +panicked_mon_event("rep
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 04:52:32PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 15:02:23 +0800
> Wen Congyang wrote:
>
> > When the guest is panicked, it will write 0x1 to the port KVM_PV_PORT.
> > So if qemu reads 0x1 from this port, we can do the folloing three
> > things according to the
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 03:06:32PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> Resending series, after fixing some coding style issues. Does anybody has any
> feedback about this proposal?
>
> Changes v1 -> v2:
> - Coding style fixes
>
> Original cover letter:
>
> I was investigating if there are any mecha
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 04:54:03PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 07:56:58PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 03:06:32PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > Resending series, after fixing some coding style issues. Does anyb
From: "Daniel P. Berrange"
The following commit
commit 3ad763fcba5bd0ec5a79d4a9b6baeef119dd4a3d
Author: Jan Kiszka
Date: Fri Mar 2 10:30:43 2012 +0100
qemu-kvm: Use machine options to configure qemu-kvm defaults
Upstream is moving towards this mechanism, so start u
chip=on that is now enable by default in upstream.
>
> CC: Daniel P. Berrange
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
ACK, looks good to me.
> Noticed that there was more to do. Can you take care of stable-1.1,
> Daniel? TIA.
Yep, will post a patch for stable-1.1 when this is accepted
in
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:30:24AM +, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> This year's Google Summer of Code has been announced:
>
> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2012
>
> For those who haven't heard of GSoC before, it funds university
> students to work on open source projects dur
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:49:58AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 02/29/2012 03:29 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> > At 02/28/2012 07:23 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
> > > On 02/27/2012 05:01 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> > >> We can know the guest is paniced when the guest runs on xen.
> > >> But we do not have suc
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:05:32PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 02/29/2012 11:58 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > >
> > > How about using a virtio-serial channel for this? You can transfer any
> > > amount of information (including the dump itself).
> >
&g
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 02:25:36PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Not a reply to the patch but a general observation.
>
> I noticed that the tcp migration uses gethostname
> (or getaddrinfo after this patch) from the main
> thread - is it really the way to go? Note that
> DNS query which is done
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 01:28:56PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/08/2012 12:15 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> > When the host knows the guest is panicked, it will set
> > exit_reason to KVM_EXIT_GUEST_PANICKED. So if qemu receive
> > this exit_reason, we can send a event to tell management
> > applic
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 01:52:45PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/08/2012 01:36 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 01:28:56PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > On 03/08/2012 12:15 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> > > > When the host knows the
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:33:33PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/12/2012 11:04 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> > Do you have any other comments about this patch?
> >
>
> Not really, but I'm not 100% convinced the patch is worthwhile. It's
> likely to only be used by Linux, which has kexec facilities
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 03:21:14PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Wed) 14 Mar 2012 [16:29:50], Wen Congyang wrote:
> > At 03/13/2012 06:47 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
> > > On 03/13/2012 11:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:33:33PM +0200, A
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 06:58:47PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 03/14/2012 06:52 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
> > On 03/14/2012 12:52 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> >>>
> If so, is this channel visible to guest userspace? If the channle is
> visible to guest
> userspace, the program running
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 07:06:50PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 03/14/2012 06:59 PM, Daniel P. Berrange Wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 06:58:47PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> >> At 03/14/2012 06:52 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
> >>> On 03/14/2012 12:52 PM, Wen Congy
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 06:25:16PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/21/2012 06:18 PM, Corey Minyard wrote:
> >
> >> Look at drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c. It has code to send panic
> >> event over IMPI. The code is pretty complex. Of course if we a going to
> >> implement something more compl
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 02:28:51PM -0400, Steven wrote:
> Hi,
> I started a kvm VM by adding -smp 2 option. From inside the guest, I
> can see that /proc/cpuinfo outputs 2 cores.
> However, in the host, I only observe one qemu-kvm process for that VM.
> Does that mean this VM is actually running on
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 02:52:40PM -0400, Steven wrote:
> Hi, Daniel,
> Thanks for your quick response. However, the ps -eLf show 4 threads
> for the VM and I checked 4 threads have the same tgid.
> But the VM I created is with -smp 2 option. Could you explain this? Thanks.
As well as the vCPU thr
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:55:04PM +0100, Kenni Lund wrote:
> 2010/12/14 Erik Brakkee :
> >> From: Kenni Lund
> >> 2010/12/14 Erik Brakkee :
>
> From: Kenni Lund
> >
> > Does this mean I have a chance now that PCI passthrough of my WinTV
> > PVR-500
> > might work now?
>
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 05:14:55PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/05/2011 04:57 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >A valid argument. I think it could also be argued that the user is
> >providing ownership of the file and writing to the file is part of the
> >low level details of the sysfs rom file AP
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 12:19:21PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/06/2011 11:42 AM, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
> >> - run trace-cmd record -e kvm -b 10 -P pid1 -P pid2, ctrl-C after a
> >seems like it's not possible to specify multiple pids, so
>
> Did you get 'overrun: something' reports from t
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 02:15:37PM +0100, Dominik Klein wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am playing with cgroups and try to limit block io for guests.
>
> The proof of concept is:
>
> # mkdir /dev/cgroup/blkio
> # mount -t cgroup -o blkio blkio /dev/cgroup/blkio/
> # cd blkio/
> # mkdir test
> # cd test/
> # l
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 03:51:13PM +0100, Philipp Hahn wrote:
> Hello,
>
> libvirt implements a manages save, which suspens a VM to a file, from which
> it
> can be resumed later. This uses Qemus/Kvms "migrate exec:" feature.
> This doesn't work reliable for me: In may cases the resumed VM seems
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:56:21PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Luiz Capitulino
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 21:31:18 +0300
> > Blue Swirl wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> > On 04/11/2011 08:15 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >>
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 06:19:14PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 05/30/2011 06:15 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >On 2011-05-30 17:10, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:04:02AM -0400, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>> On 2011-05-30 16:38, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2011, Jan Ki
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 09:45:37AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 01:09:23PM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> > Hello, all,
> >
> > I have prepared to work on a feature called "Disk I/O limits" for
> > qemu-kvm projeect.
> > This feature will enable the user to cap disk I/
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:10:37AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 02:56:46PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 09:45:37AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 01:09:23PM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 02:08:55PM +0200, Tomas Papan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found this in the libvirt (but those messages are same in 3.8.x)
> anakin libvirt # cat libvirtd.log
> 2013-05-08 11:59:29.645+: 3750: info : libvirt version: 1.0.5
> 2013-05-08 11:59:29.645+: 3750: error : udevGetDMI
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 06:45:08PM +0530, chandrashekar shastri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Below are bugs filed in this week for Upstream qemu and libvirt:
>
> Qemu in Launchpad:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/opensuse/+bug/1199416
> Hot-add qcow2 [virtio-scsi] devices doesn't work in SlLES-11-SP2guest
>
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:40:28AM +, Naor Shlomo wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> For some unknown reason it suddenly started to accept the changes to the XML
> and the strings you gave me are now in place.
> Upon machine start I now receive the following error messages:
>
> virsh # start NaorDev
> e
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:47:07AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 11/09/2013 00:27, James Sparenberg ha scritto:
> > I'm doing some experimenting in our Development lab and as a result
> > I'm kickstarting over and over Virtual guests. This is of course
> > causing the guest Id to increment by o
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 08:21:21AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 07/20/2014 03:38 AM, David Marchand wrote:
> > When using ivshmem devices, notifications between guests can be sent as
> > interrupts using a ivshmem-server (typical use described in documentation).
> > The client is provided as a deb
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 05:10:44PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Btw,
>
> while I got your attention, on a not-really related topic: how do we
> feel about adding support for specifying a non-contiguous set of cpus
> for a numa node in qemu with the -numa option? I.e., like this, for
> example:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 08:30:30PM -0500, Rohit Bhat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need a small help. I am working on a project where i have to monitor
> network activity of a VM running on KVM.
>
> I am interested in how much data is going into the VM and how much
> data is coming out of the VM. I checked
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:39:39PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
>
> HW TSC scaling is a feature of AMD processors that allows a
> multiplier to be specified to the TSC frequency exposed to the guest.
>
> KVM also contains provision to trap TSC ("KVM: Infrastructure for
> software and hardware
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 06:43:00PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Hello Jan,
>
> Am 01.10.2012 16:34, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
> > If we built a target for a host that supports KVM in principle, set the
> > default accelerator to KVM as well. This also means the start of QEMU
> > will fail to start if
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 08:19:29AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Jan Kiszka writes:
> I think at this point, none of this matters but I added the various
> distro maintainers to the thread.
>
> I think it's time for the distros to drop qemu-kvm and just ship
> qemu.git. Is there anything else
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 02:33:58PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Peter Maydell writes:
>
> > On 29 April 2014 11:09, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> Let's just make clear how to contact us securely, when to contact that
> >> list, and what we'll do with the info. I cobbled together the
> >>
1 - 100 of 239 matches
Mail list logo
