On 29/10/14 05:19, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Here's a draft CommonHV spec. It's also on github:
>
> https://github.com/amluto/CommonHV
>
> So far, this provides a two-way RNG interface, a way to detect it, and
> a way to detect other hypervisor leaves. The latter is because, after
> both the enorm
On 27/11/14 18:36, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 07:36:31AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 11/26/2014 11:26 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
>>>
>>> Some folks had reported that some xen hypercalls take a long time
>>> to complete when issued from
On 02/06/14 13:45, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> I'm running
>
> kernel-3.14.4-200.fc20.x86_64
> qemu-1.6.2-5.fc20.x86_64
> xen-4.4.0-4.fc21
>
> In process of trying to get a Xen hypervisor running inside a KVM guest I
> found that there's a problem with x2apic. NB I do *not* use nested-VMX
> here
On 17/09/15 00:33, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Setting CONFIG_PARAVIRT=y has an unintended side effect: it silently
> turns all rdmsr and wrmsr operations into the safe variants without
> any checks that the operations actually succeed.
>
> This is IMO awful: it papers over bugs. In particular, KVM g
On 17/09/15 16:27, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 01:39:26PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> That's not a big deal, that's what *_safe is for. The problem is that
>> there are definitely some cases where the *_safe version is not being used.
> I mean to do feature checks which ass
On 17/09/2015 21:23, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 06:39:03PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
>>> On 09/16/2015 05:08 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 05:04:31PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrot
On 22/01/15 02:17, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> --- a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@
> #include
> #include
> #include
> +#include
> +#include
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86
> #include
> @@ -1243,6 +1245,17 @@ void xen_evtchn_do_upcall
ary hypercall page, calls made via
>>>>> the new page may be preempted.
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrew had originally submitted a version of this work [0].
>>>>>
>>>>> [0] http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-02/msg01056.
On 22/01/2015 20:58, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 12:24:47 -0800
>> Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
Also, please remove the "notrace", because function tracing goes an
extra step to not require RCU being visible. The o
On 27/01/15 08:35, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 27.01.15 at 02:51, wrote:
> Even if David told you this would be acceptable, I have to question
> an abstract model of fixing issues on only 64-bit kernels - this may
> be acceptable for distro purposes, but seems hardly the right
> approach for upstre
10 matches
Mail list logo
