On 07/11/2014 17:22, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-11-07 at 10:47 -0500, Timothy McDaniel wrote:
>> here is my /proc/cpuinfo
>>
>> processor : 0
>> vendor_id : CentaurHauls
>> cpu family : 6
>> model : 15
>> model name : VIA Nano processor U2250 (1.6GHz Cap
Hi Christoffer,
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 1:55 AM, Christoffer Dall
wrote:
> Hi Anup,
>
> [This time to the new email]
>
> What are your plans in terms of follow-up on this one?
Actually, I am already working on RFC v2. I will send-out
RFC v2 sometime next time.
This RFC v2 will be RFC v1 based up
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 10:18:32PM -0500, Timothy McDaniel wrote:
> Via Nano fails and completely crashes on kvm
>
> here is my /proc/cpuinfo
>
> processor : 0
> vendor_id : CentaurHauls
> cpu family : 6
> model : 15
> model name : VIA Nano processor U2250 (1.6GHz
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 09:59:55AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 11:17 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 07/11/2014 07:27, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> Is there an easy benchmark that's sensitive to the time it takes to
> >> round-trip from userspace to guest and back
Yes, sounds good. I will review RFC v2 then.
-Christoffer
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
> Hi Christoffer,
>
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 1:55 AM, Christoffer Dall
> wrote:
>> Hi Anup,
>>
>> [This time to the new email]
>>
>> What are your plans in terms of follow-up on this on
On Nov 8, 2014 4:01 AM, "Gleb Natapov" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 09:59:55AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 11:17 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 07/11/2014 07:27, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > >> Is there an easy benchmark that's sensitive to the time
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Nov 8, 2014 4:01 AM, "Gleb Natapov" wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 09:59:55AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> > On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 11:17 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 07/11/2014 07:27, Andy Lutomirski wrote
