Hi,
>> This seems to not support 64bit prefetchable memory windows, at least
>> linux doesn't think it does, lspci looks like this:
>>
>> 00:10.0 PCI bridge: Red Hat, Inc. Device 0001 (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
[ ... ]
>> Memory behind bridge: f600-f60f
>> Prefetchable
Alexander Graf hat am Mon 20. Feb, 22:27 (+0100) geschrieben:
> On 20.02.2012, at 18:38, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> > Alexander Graf hat am Tue 22. Nov, 22:29 (+0100) geschrieben:
> >> On 22.11.2011, at 21:04, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> >>> [1] »kernel BUG at include/linux/kvm_host.h:603!«
> >>> http://www.mai
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42755
--- Comment #31 from Rosen 2012-02-21 08:55:31 ---
any responses ?
with/without ksm no change.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are watching t
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42755
--- Comment #32 from Gleb 2012-02-21 09:10:37 ---
Can you run perf without ksm? In your previous perf invocation ksm was at the
top, so lets see what is it there now.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
On 20.02.2012 21:45, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 08:59:38PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 20.02.2012 20:04, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 08:40:08PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 07:17:55PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
Hi,
I came a across an i
Liu Yu wrote:
> If the guest hypervisor node contains "has-idle" property.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Yu
> ---
> v5: no change
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/epapr_hcalls.S | 29 +
> arch/powerpc/kernel/epapr_paravirt.c | 11 ++-
> 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:50:47AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> >I hope it will make Windows use TSC instead, but you can't be sure
> >about anything with Windows :(
> Whatever it does now it eates more CPU has almost equal
> number of exits and throughput is about the same (15MB/s).
> If pmtimer i
On 21.02.2012 11:56, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:50:47AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
I hope it will make Windows use TSC instead, but you can't be sure
about anything with Windows :(
Whatever it does now it eates more CPU has almost equal
number of exits and throughput is abou
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:59:23AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 21.02.2012 11:56, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:50:47AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> >>>I hope it will make Windows use TSC instead, but you can't be sure
> >>>about anything with Windows :(
> >>Whatever it does
On 21.02.2012 12:00, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:59:23AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 21.02.2012 11:56, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:50:47AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
I hope it will make Windows use TSC instead, but you can't be sure
about anything with W
On 02/20/2012 04:28 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 04:25:04PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On 02/16/2012 03:03 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 02/15/2012 07:18 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On 02/15/2012 01:23 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
static u64 pvclock_get_nsec_offset(struct
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:16:16PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 21.02.2012 12:00, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:59:23AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> >>On 21.02.2012 11:56, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:50:47AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> >I hope it
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42755
Kurk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@shiftmail.org
--- Comment #33 from Kurk
On 21.02.2012 12:46, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:16:16PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 21.02.2012 12:00, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:59:23AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 21.02.2012 11:56, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:50:47AM +0100, Pete
On 02/18/12 14:25, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Pete Ashdown wrote:
>> > On 02/17/2012 04:30 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>> >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:57 AM, Pete Ashdown
>>> >> wrote:
>>> I've been waiting for some response from the Ubuntu team regarding a
>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42755
--- Comment #34 from Rosen 2012-02-21 12:45:15 ---
(In reply to comment #33)
> Supposing it was working good with an old version of kvm:
> Why don't you just do a git bisect? qemu-kvm is very quick to compile and
> install. Start kvm with -s
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Lieven"
To: "Gleb Natapov"
Cc: qemu-de...@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, vroze...@redhat.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 2:05:25 PM
Subject: Re: win7 bad i/o performance, high insn_emulation and exists
On 21.02.2012 12:46, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>
Am 20.02.2012 11:13, schrieb Juan Quintela:
>
> Hi
>
> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
What's the status with qtest? (Though probably a one-line email would
already answer this)
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body o
On 21.02.2012 14:56, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Lieven"
To: "Gleb Natapov"
Cc: qemu-de...@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, vroze...@redhat.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 2:05:25 PM
Subject: Re: win7 bad i/o performance, high insn_emulation and exists
Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 20.02.2012 11:13, schrieb Juan Quintela:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>
> What's the status with qtest? (Though probably a one-line email would
> already answer this)
As this is the only topic for today call, and you agre
On 02/21/2012 08:06 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 20.02.2012 11:13, schrieb Juan Quintela:
Hi
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
What's the status with qtest? (Though probably a one-line email would
already answer this)
I still need to go through Paolo's patches. I
On 9 February 2012 22:23, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Ping re the VMState and variable sized arrays issue. I don't
> see any consensus in this discussion for a different approach,
> so should we just commit Mitsyanko's patchset?
>From an IRC conversation I just had with Anthony and Juan:
===begin==
14
Hi Stefan,
see below.
On 13.02.2012 11:57, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Dongsu Park
> wrote:
> > Now I'm running benchmarks with both qemu-kvm 0.14.1 and 1.0.
> >
> > - Sequential read (Running inside guest)
> > # fio -name iops -rw=read -size=1G -iodepth 1 \
> >
Hi Rusty,
On 13.02.2012 10:25, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:36:39 +0100, Dongsu Park
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Recently I observed performance regression regarding virtio-blk,
> > especially different IO bandwidths between qemu-kvm 0.14.1 and 1.0.
> > So I want to share the benc
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Lieven"
To: "Vadim Rozenfeld"
Cc: qemu-de...@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Gleb Natapov"
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 4:10:22 PM
Subject: Re: win7 bad i/o performance, high insn_emulation and exists
On 21.02.2012 14:56, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Dongsu Park
wrote:
> On 13.02.2012 11:57, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Dongsu Park
>> wrote:
>> > Now I'm running benchmarks with both qemu-kvm 0.14.1 and 1.0.
>> >
>> > - Sequential read (Running inside guest)
>> > # fio -name io
On 15.12.2010 12:53, Ulrich Obergfell wrote:
- "Anthony Liguori" wrote:
On 12/14/2010 06:09 AM, Ulrich Obergfell wrote:
[...]
Parts 1 thru 4 of this RFC contain experimental source code which
I recently used to investigate the performance benefit. In a Linux
guest, I was running a progr
On 21.02.2012 17:48, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Lieven"
To: "Vadim Rozenfeld"
Cc: qemu-de...@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Gleb Natapov"
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 4:10:22 PM
Subject: Re: win7 bad i/o performance, high insn_emulation and exists
On
From: Nicolae Mogoreanu
KVM: Ignore the writes to MSR_K7_HWCR(3)
When CPUID Fn8000_0001_EAX reports 0x00100f22 Windows 7 x64 guest
tries to set bit 3 in MSRC001_0015 in nt!KiDisableCacheErrataSource
and fails. This patch will ignore this step and allow things to move
on without having to fake CPU
On 02/20/2012 10:46 PM, Liu Yu wrote:
> from the kvm guest paravirt init code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Yu
> ---
> v5:
> 1. fix the if test
> 2. use patch_instruction()
> 3. code cleanup
> 4. rename the files
> 5. make epapr paravirt user-selectable
>
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/epapr_hcalls.h |
On 02/20/2012 10:46 PM, Liu Yu wrote:
> Discard the old way that invoke hypercall,
> instead, use epapr paravirt.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Yu
> ---
> v5: new patch
>
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/epapr_hcalls.h | 22 +-
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/fsl_hcalls.h | 36 +
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:45:08 +0100, Dongsu Park
wrote:
> Hi Rusty,
>
> On 13.02.2012 10:25, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:36:39 +0100, Dongsu Park
> > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Recently I observed performance regression regarding virtio-blk,
> > > especially different IO
On 02/20/2012 11:34 AM, Prasad Joshi wrote:
Signed-off-by: Prasad Joshi
This breaks compatibility with existing guests and more importantly, doesn't
make any sense. There's no commit message explaining why 1MB is a better number
than 4K, 2MB which I could at least understand as an alternativ
Hi all,
Is there any video driver for KVM that supports HDCP? I'm trying to run
windows media center inside a VM and it's saying the "Your graphics card
or driver doesn't support content protection"
Thanks,
-J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 5:56 AM
> To: Liu Yu-B13201
> Cc: ag...@suse.de; kvm-...@vger.kernel.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org;
> linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org; Wood Scott-B07421
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] KVM: PPC: epapr: Factor out the epa
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 5:58 AM
> To: Liu Yu-B13201
> Cc: ag...@suse.de; kvm-...@vger.kernel.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org;
> linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org; Wood Scott-B07421
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] KVM: PPC: epapr: Update other hyper
Liu Yu-B13201 wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: tiejun.chen [mailto:tiejun.c...@windriver.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 6:54 PM
>> To: Liu Yu-B13201
>> Cc: ag...@suse.de; kvm-...@vger.kernel.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org;
>> linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org; Wood Scott-B07421
>> Subject
37 matches
Mail list logo
