On 11/10/2011 07:54 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> IMO, this should be a release blocker. qemu 1.0 only supporting
>> migration on enterprise storage?
>
>
> No, this is not going to block the release.
>
> You can't dump patches on the ML during -rc for an issue that has been
> understood for well o
On 11/11/2011 12:15 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 10.11.2011 22:30, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> > Live migration with qcow2 or any other image format is just not going to
> > work
> > right now even with proper clustered storage. I think doing a block level
> > flush
> > cache interface and lettin
On 11/11/2011 04:03 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
> I don't view not supporting migration with image formats as a
> regression as it's never been a feature we've supported. While there
> might be confusion about support around NFS, I think it's always been
> clear that image formats cannot be used.
On 11/10/2011 10:05 PM, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011, Avi Kivity wrote about "Re: [PATCH 02/10] nEPT: MMU
> context for nested EPT":
> > This is all correct, but the code in question parses the EPT12 table
> > using the ia32 page table format. They're sufficiently similar so that
>
On 11/12/2011 04:20 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/10/2011 07:54 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
IMO, this should be a release blocker. qemu 1.0 only supporting
migration on enterprise storage?
No, this is not going to block the release.
You can't dump patches on the ML during -rc for an issue that
On 11/12/2011 04:27 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/11/2011 04:03 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I don't view not supporting migration with image formats as a
regression as it's never been a feature we've supported. While there
might be confusion about support around NFS, I think it's always been
clea
On 11/12/2011 03:30 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Nor can you yank support for migration this way. Might as well put a
>> big sign on 1.0, "Do Not Use This Release".
>
>
> You're joking, right?
No.
>
> Let's be very clear. Live migration works perfectly fine when you use
> raw images and cohere
On 11/12/2011 03:39 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 11/12/2011 04:27 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 11/11/2011 04:03 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't view not supporting migration with image formats as a
>>> regression as it's never been a feature we've supported. While there
>>> might be c
On 11/12/2011 08:43 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/12/2011 03:39 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 11/12/2011 04:27 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/11/2011 04:03 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I don't view not supporting migration with image formats as a
regression as it's never been a feature we've support
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011, Avi Kivity wrote about "Re: [PATCH 02/10] nEPT: MMU
context for nested EPT":
> host may write-protect a page. Second, the shadow and guest ptes may be
> in different formats (ept vs ia32).
I'm afraid I've lost you here... The shadow table and the to-be-shadowed
table are b
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Stepan Moskovchenko
wrote:
> Yes, the scatterlist is allowed to have different page sizes. But, they are
> required to have a length that is a multiple of 4K. If a page in the list is
An element in scatterlist may not be aligned by 4K but I think IOMMU driver
mus
The -Wunused-result is the default option of gcc, so no need to
add it to the FLAGS.
And the previous version of gcc can't support this flag, it may
cause a compile error.
Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao
---
tools/kvm/Makefile |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/
12 matches
Mail list logo