On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 08:41:48AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > a single GSI and vice versa. As there are less GSIs than possible
> > MSI
> > messages, we could run out of them when creating routes, statically
> > or
> > lazily.
> >
> > What
> Well do the obvious (where you can see that interrupts or preemption are
> disabled in the function or in a calling function). Leave the rest as is
> and provide separate patches for them?
Thanks for comments! I initialized the patch as following accordingly,
And cc to more maintainers for revi
On 10/19/2011 11:23 AM, Alex,Shi wrote:
> > Well do the obvious (where you can see that interrupts or preemption are
> > disabled in the function or in a calling function). Leave the rest as is
> > and provide separate patches for them?
>
> Thanks for comments! I initialized the patch as following
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/18/2011 09:41 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
> Looks OK to me.
>
>
Same here.
- --
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Com
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 06:41:56AM -0400, Mark Wu wrote:
> On 06/09/2011 05:14 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 08:51:05AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> >> On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:08:29 -0400, Mark Wu wrote:
> >>> Hi Rusty,
> >>> Yes, I can't figure out an instance o
On 2011-10-19 08:33, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On 10/19/2011 03:41 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-10-17 18:00, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>>> On 10/17/2011 05:49 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/17/2011 11:40 AM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>>>
>>
>> LINT1 may have been programmed as a level -trigger
Hi guys,
This is a patchset with four new tests to KVM specific cgroup testing. Also I
made some modifications into (general) cgroup_common library which makes cgroup
testing better readable and more safe to execute. Please find the details in
each patch.
Also please beware of qemu-kvm bugs wh
* functions for adding and removal of drive to vm using host-file or
host-scsi_debug device.
* move get_children_pids() into base_utils.py
* client.virt.kvm_monitor: add 'debug=True' parameter into monitor.info() cmd
* client.common_lib.base_utils: add etraceback() function for formating
traceb
* Use exceptions instead of returns
* cgroup and cgroup-kvm tests were modified to fit
* other code cleanups
Signed-off-by: Lukas Doktor
---
client/tests/cgroup/cgroup.py| 169 +-
client/tests/cgroup/cgroup_common.py | 140 ++--
* override "check" parameter to True / False / String (different value)
* add checkprop parameter to change the property which is used to check the
value.
* use more sane "set_property_h" function name instead of "set_prop"
* change raise error.TestFail for error.TestError
* get_property: r
* Four new subtests for testing blkio.throttle.{read,write}_bps_device
cgroup functionalities.
* TestBlkioThrottleRead/Write let dd read/write for 1 minute and verifies
the correct throughput.
* TestBlkioThrottleMultipleRead/Write let dd read/write while switching
multiple cgroups with
On 2011-10-19 11:03, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> I thought we need to match APIC ID. That needs a table lookup, no?
>>
>> Yes. But that's completely independent of a concrete MSI message. In
>> fact, this is the same thing we need when interpreting an IOAPIC
>> redirection table entry. So let's c
Avi & Guys,
Thanks for your patience, I just got the sucker booting by switching
the -M option to be an isapc system. And I was wrong about it being a
Gateway, it's a packard Bell system running Windows 3.1, talk about a
blast from the past. I think I still have the keyboard around
somehwere.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 01:37:32PM -0400, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 10/18/2011 06:35 PM, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:23:11PM -0400, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > > AMD processors apparently have a bug in the hardware task switching
> > > support when NPT is enabled. If the task switch
Hi Jim,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 07:28:52PM +0100, Jim wrote:
> Sure, the KVM command is :
>
> /usr/bin/kvm -enable-nesting -no-kvm-irqchip -S -M pc-0.14 -enable-kvm
> -m 2048 -smp 2,sockets=2,cores=1,threads=1 -name hyperv1 -uuid
> 8c5d8f1f-5767-b388-d408-1b53a1b66e72 -nodefconfig -nodefaults
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 09:58:32AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> The vcpu reference of a kvm_timer can't become NULL while the timer is
> valid, so drop this redundant test. This also makes it pointless to
> carry a separate __kvm_timer_fn, fold it into kvm_timer_fn.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
>
On 19/10/2011 16:06, Jim wrote:
Hi Joerg,
I added the -cpu phenom,-hv but it made no difference. I then tried
to call it from the command line (rather then via virsh) and get this :
# /usr/bin/kvm -cpu phenom,-hv
*CPU feature hv not found*
I played around a little and found 'svm' seemed
On 10/19/2011 06:57 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>
>>> Looks OK to me.
>>>
>>> Please don't forget to bake a qemu-only patch for those bits that apply
>>> to upstream as well (ie. the user space APIC path).
>>>
>>> Jan
>>>
>>
>> I did forget it.
>> Did you mean we need to add "#ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQCHIP" b
On 10/19/2011 05:29 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/18/2011 09:41 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>
>> Looks OK to me.
>>
>>
>
> Same here.
Who will merge it?
Thanks,
Lai
>
> - --
> I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
> si
On 10/18/2011 04:29 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>> Almost all the exits show "[FAILED TO PARSE]", would this be a problem?
>>
>
> Did you 'make install' trace-cmd? run it from outside the chroot.
You need to install the plugins: make install_plugins
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send th
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011, Alex,Shi wrote:
> Thanks for comments! I initialized the patch as following accordingly,
> And cc to more maintainers for review. I checked all code except xen/kvm
> part, totally a idiot for them.
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
qemu-kvm-0.15.1 is now available. This release is based on the
upstream qemu 0.15.1, plus kvm-specific enhancements. Please see
http://wiki.qemu.org/ChangeLog/0.15 for a list of changes in this
release.
This release can be used with the kvm kernel modules provided by your
distribution kernel, or
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 07:02:37PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> The MSI-X page must start below the address that comes after the end of
> a region. Otherwise we risk to register it twice. This bug existed since
> day #1 of the MSI-X support and was now reveal by
>
> memory.c:1201: memory_region_add_
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 09:15:10AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> My testing version of Smatch complains that addr and len come from
> the user and they can wrap. The path is:
> -> kvm_vm_ioctl()
> -> kvm_vm_ioctl_unregister_coalesced_mmio()
> -> coalesced_mmio_in_range()
>
> I don'
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:27:11PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Avi, Marcelo,
>
> here are 4 fixes for kvm on s390:
> 1. check cpu_id prior to using it
> 2. fix return value of kvm_arch_init_vm
> 3. fix register setting
> 4. implement sigp external call
>
> All patches have been tested i
> -Original Message-
> From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org]
> On Behalf Of Roopa Prabhu
> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 11:26 PM
> To: net...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: s...@us.ibm.com; dragos.tatu...@gmail.com; a...@arndb.de;
> kvm@vger.kernel.org; m...@red
On 10/19/11 2:06 PM, "Rose, Gregory V" wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org]
>> On Behalf Of Roopa Prabhu
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 11:26 PM
>> To: net...@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: s...@us.ibm.com; dragos.tatu...@
> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter
Thanks, Christoph!
and resend for code style problem correction.
>From b8d595063259a636778b14c43f3cf024e908fd25 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Shi
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:25:50 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Code clean up for percpu_xxx() functions
> All of the kvm usage is in preemption disabled contexts.
Thanks! So would you like to ack this patch?
===
>From 8ca7e6e40d75eab598c4fb4f8d555299b747adfa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Shi
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:31:51 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Change this_cpu_xxx to __this_cpu_xxx f
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 10/18/2011 07:39 PM, Jorge Lucangeli Obes wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> > On 10/18/2011 06:43 PM, Jorge Lucangeli Obes wrote:
>> >> https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B78o7gMWkuFeYzUzODViMjUtNzliNy00ODc5LWIw
Le jeudi 20 octobre 2011 à 10:44 +0800, Alex,Shi a écrit :
> > Acked-by: Christoph Lameter
>
> Thanks, Christoph!
> and resend for code style problem correction.
>
Sorry this huge patch brings too many potential bugs.
I ask you a separate patch for the networking part, because I dont want
to
> Sorry this huge patch brings too many potential bugs.
>
> I ask you a separate patch for the networking part, because I dont want
> to Ack all the other parts.
>
Thanks a lot for review! I split the first patch into 2 according your
suggestion. The second one for network here:
>From d5d7112
> Sorry this huge patch brings too many potential bugs.
>
> I ask you a separate patch for the networking part, because I dont want
> to Ack all the other parts.
Thanks a lot for review! I split the first patch into 2 according your
suggestion. The first one is here:
>From 516756ad094c49f8ddc4
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 14:04 +0800, Alex,Shi wrote:
> > Sorry this huge patch brings too many potential bugs.
> >
> > I ask you a separate patch for the networking part, because I dont want
> > to Ack all the other parts.
> >
>
> Thanks a lot for review! I split the first patch into 2 according y
34 matches
Mail list logo
