This patch checks SMEP on prefetch pte path when
cr0.wp=1 and cr0.wp=0.
Signed-off-by: Yang, Wei
Signed-off-by: Li, Xin
Signed-off-by: Shan, Haitao
---
x86/access.c | 92 ++--
x86/cstart64.S |1 +
2 files changed, 90 insertions(+)
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 01:20:53PM -0400, Chris Wright wrote:
> * David Woodhouse (dw...@infradead.org) wrote:
> > I'd much rather KVM just gave us a list of the pages to map, in a single
> > call.
>
> This makes most sense to me.
But how is this supposed to work with arbitrary page-sizes? When w
2011/6/23 Jan Kiszka :
> On 2011-06-23 15:56, lidong chen wrote:
is it safe to register another signal handler?
if somebody know the reason, please tell me.
and is it worth to do this?
>>>
>> because the core dump file is too big, and the time of core dump is too long.
>> I do a
On 2011-06-24 10:24, lidong chen wrote:
> 2011/6/23 Jan Kiszka :
>> On 2011-06-23 15:56, lidong chen wrote:
> is it safe to register another signal handler?
> if somebody know the reason, please tell me.
>
> and is it worth to do this?
>>> because the core dump file is too big,
On 2011-06-24 10:55, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-06-24 10:24, lidong chen wrote:
>> 2011/6/23 Jan Kiszka :
>>> On 2011-06-23 15:56, lidong chen wrote:
>> is it safe to register another signal handler?
>> if somebody know the reason, please tell me.
>>
>> and is it worth to do this?
On 06/24/2011 03:16 PM, Yang, Wei wrote:
> +void set_cr4_smep(int smep)
> +{
> +unsigned long cr4 = read_cr4();
> +
> +cr4 &= ~CR4_SMEP_MASK;
> +if (smep)
> + cr4 |= CR4_SMEP_MASK;
> +write_cr4(cr4);
> +}
> +
It can work if the box does not support SMEP?
> void set_efer_nx(i
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:24:02PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>> The virtio block device holds a lock during I/O request processing.
>>> Kicking the virtqueue while the lock
On 06/16/2011 03:29 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Asias He wrote:
>
>> On 06/16/2011 05:33 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>> Send signals only to the thread which handles console injection
>>> instead of the entire process.
>>>
>>> This prevents every single thread from having to ignore SIGALRM
>>> and wil
2011/6/24 Jan Kiszka :
> On 2011-06-24 10:55, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-06-24 10:24, lidong chen wrote:
>>> 2011/6/23 Jan Kiszka :
On 2011-06-23 15:56, lidong chen wrote:
>>> is it safe to register another signal handler?
>>> if somebody know the reason, please tell me.
>>>
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 15:50 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> The protocol data is in little-endian format.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V
> ---
> tools/kvm/Makefile|1 +
> tools/kvm/include/kvm/virtio-9p.h | 81 ++-
> tools/kvm/virtio/9p-pdu.c | 237 ++
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:47:18 -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 15:50 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > The protocol data is in little-endian format.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V
> > ---
> > tools/kvm/Makefile|1 +
> > tools/kvm/include/kvm/virtio-
LGTM, applied, thanks!
http://autotest.kernel.org/changeset/5450
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:00 AM, Qingtang Zhou wrote:
> monitor socket will be initiated at the beginning of '*Monitor.__init__',
> if exception occur in this function, socket will not be closed correctly.
> In this case, socket sh
Is anyone working on SR-IOV for KVM, specifically for networking? Or is
virtio good enough that it's not a pressing concern?
Thanks,
Chris
--
Chris Friesen
Software Developer
GENBAND
chris.frie...@genband.com
www.genband.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm"
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 21:30 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:47:18 -0400, Sasha Levin
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 15:50 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > > +static void virtio_p9_pdu_read(struct p9_pdu *pdu, void *data, size_t
> > > size)
> > > +{
> > > + size_t le
I have tested the performance of sr-iov for kvm, it better than virtio-net.
2011/6/25 Chris Friesen :
>
> Is anyone working on SR-IOV for KVM, specifically for networking? Or is
> virtio good enough that it's not a pressing concern?
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
>
>
> --
> Chris Friesen
> Software Develope
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 15:10 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
> Is anyone working on SR-IOV for KVM, specifically for networking? Or is
> virtio good enough that it's not a pressing concern?
>
What exactly are you missing now?
> Thanks,
> Chris
>
>
--
Sasha.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: s
Hi,
Does anyone successfully use USB drive in Windows7 guest? If I pass a
USB drive to Windows7 guest, Device Manager may find this device but
the USB mass storage driver can't be installed successfully. I have
tried many times. Is the emulated USB controller is so old and
Windows7 doesn't support
>
> > +void set_cr4_smep(int smep)
> > +{
> > +unsigned long cr4 = read_cr4();
> > +
> > +cr4 &= ~CR4_SMEP_MASK;
> > +if (smep)
> > + cr4 |= CR4_SMEP_MASK;
> > +write_cr4(cr4);
> > +}
> > +
>
> It can work if the box does not support SMEP?
It will report unhandled exception 13
18 matches
Mail list logo
