kvm@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 9:28:45 PM
Subject: Re: vhost-blk development
On 04/20/2012 04:26 AM, Michael Baysek wrote:
> Can you point me to the latest revision of the code and provide some
> guidance on how to test it? I really would love to see if it helps.
There
On 04/20/2012 04:26 AM, Michael Baysek wrote:
> Can you point me to the latest revision of the code and provide some
> guidance on how to test it? I really would love to see if it helps.
There is no latest revision, I didn't continue the development when I
saw the sign that it wouldn't be acce
vger.kernel.org
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 10:38:39 PM
Subject: Re: vhost-blk development
On 04/12/2012 12:52 AM, Michael Baysek wrote:
> In this particular case, I did intend to deploy these instances directly to
> the ramdisk. I want to squeeze every drop of performance out of these
&g
On 04/12/2012 12:52 AM, Michael Baysek wrote:
> In this particular case, I did intend to deploy these instances directly to
> the ramdisk. I want to squeeze every drop of performance out of these
> instances for use cases with lots of concurrent accesses. I thought it
> would be possible to
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Michael Baysek wrote:
> I am purposefully not using O_DIRECT since most workloads will not be using
> it, although I did notice better performance when I did use it. I did
> already identify the page cache as a hinderance as well.
If you do not use O_DIRECT in th
: "Stefan Hajnoczi"
To: "Michael Baysek"
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 3:19:48 AM
Subject: Re: vhost-blk development
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Michael Baysek wrote:
> Well, I'm trying to determine which I/O method currently has the very l
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Michael Baysek wrote:
> Well, I'm trying to determine which I/O method currently has the very least
> performance overhead and gives the best performance for both reads and writes.
>
> I am doing my testing by putting the entire guest onto a ramdisk. I'm
> worki
e to
take a look at. If you have any other thoughts, that would also be helpful.
-Mike
- Original Message -
From: "Stefan Hajnoczi"
To: "Michael Baysek"
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 4:55:26 AM
Subject: Re: vhost-blk development
On Mon, A
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Michael Baysek wrote:
> Hi all. I'm interested in any developments on the vhost-blk in kernel
> accelerator for disk i/o.
>
> I had seen a patchset on LKML https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/7/28/175 but that is
> rather old. Are there any newer developments going on w
Hi all. I'm interested in any developments on the vhost-blk in kernel
accelerator for disk i/o.
I had seen a patchset on LKML https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/7/28/175 but that is
rather old. Are there any newer developments going on with the vhost-blk stuff?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
10 matches
Mail list logo
