On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:28:22PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On 04/11/2011 11:07 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:01:30PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> >> On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 16:58 +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 09:49:31PM +0800, Amos Kong wrot
On 04/11/2011 11:07 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:01:30PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>> On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 16:58 +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 09:49:31PM +0800, Amos Kong wrote:
System halted.
[note: guest hung ...]
>>> Isn't tha
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:01:30PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 16:58 +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 09:49:31PM +0800, Amos Kong wrote:
> > > System halted.
> > > [note: guest hung ...]
> > >
> > Isn't that expected result without ACPI support? I w
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 16:58 +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 09:49:31PM +0800, Amos Kong wrote:
> > System halted.
> > [note: guest hung ...]
> >
> Isn't that expected result without ACPI support? I would expect all guests
> to hang like that at the end.
I see hangs with D
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 09:49:31PM +0800, Amos Kong wrote:
> System halted.
> [note: guest hung ...]
>
Isn't that expected result without ACPI support? I would expect all guests
to hang like that at the end.
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "uns
I try to test with a rhel6.0 guest, it hung during the shutdown.
guest)# init 0
guest)# could not read byte from child: Success
initctl: Event failed
Stopping atd: [ OK ]
Stopping abrt daemon: [ OK ]
Stopping sshd: [ OK ]
Shutting down postfix: [ OK ]
Stopping crond: [ OK ]
Stopping HAL
