On 27.03.2012 19:06, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 06:16:11 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 18:12, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 05:58:01 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 17:44, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 04:06:13 PM Pete
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 06:16:11 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 27.03.2012 18:12, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> > On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 05:58:01 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
> >> On 27.03.2012 17:44, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 04:06:13 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 27.03.2
On 27.03.2012 18:12, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 05:58:01 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 17:44, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 04:06:13 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 14:29, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:28:04PM +0200, Pete
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 05:58:01 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 27.03.2012 17:44, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> > On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 04:06:13 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
> >> On 27.03.2012 14:29, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:28:04PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 27.03.2
On 27.03.2012 17:44, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 04:06:13 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 14:29, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:28:04PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 14:26, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:20:23PM +0200, Pete
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 05:39:10 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 27.03.2012 17:37, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> > On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 04:44:51 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
> >> On 27.03.2012 13:43, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 12:49:58 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 27.03.2
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 04:06:13 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 27.03.2012 14:29, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:28:04PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
> >> On 27.03.2012 14:26, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:20:23PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 27.03.2
On 27.03.2012 17:37, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 04:44:51 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 13:43, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 12:49:58 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 12:40, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 11:26:29 AM Pete
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 04:44:51 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 27.03.2012 13:43, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> > On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 12:49:58 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
> >> On 27.03.2012 12:40, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 11:26:29 AM Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 27.03.2
On 27.03.2012 13:43, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 12:49:58 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 12:40, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 11:26:29 AM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 11:23, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:56:05 AM Gleb
On 27.03.2012 14:29, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:28:04PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 14:26, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:20:23PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 12:00, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:26:29AM +0200, Pete
On 27.03.2012 14:29, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:28:04PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 14:26, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:20:23PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 12:00, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:26:29AM +0200, Pete
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:28:04PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 27.03.2012 14:26, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:20:23PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
> >>On 27.03.2012 12:00, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:26:29AM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 27.03.20
On 27.03.2012 14:26, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:20:23PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 12:00, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:26:29AM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 11:23, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:56:05 AM Gleb
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:20:23PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 27.03.2012 12:00, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:26:29AM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
> >>On 27.03.2012 11:23, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> >>>On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:56:05 AM Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar
On 27.03.2012 12:00, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:26:29AM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 11:23, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:56:05 AM Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:11:43PM +0200, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Monday, March 26, 2
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 12:49:58 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 27.03.2012 12:40, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> > On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 11:26:29 AM Peter Lieven wrote:
> >> On 27.03.2012 11:23, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:56:05 AM Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Mon, Ma
On 27.03.2012 12:40, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 11:26:29 AM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 11:23, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:56:05 AM Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:11:43PM +0200, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Monday, March 26, 2
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 11:26:29 AM Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 27.03.2012 11:23, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> > On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:56:05 AM Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:11:43PM +0200, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> >>> On Monday, March 26, 2012 08:54:50 PM Peter Lieven wrot
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:26:29AM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 27.03.2012 11:23, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> >On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:56:05 AM Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >>On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:11:43PM +0200, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> >>>On Monday, March 26, 2012 08:54:50 PM Peter Lieven wrot
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:23:33AM +0200, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:56:05 AM Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:11:43PM +0200, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> > > On Monday, March 26, 2012 08:54:50 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
> > > > On 26.03.2012 20:36, Vadim Rozen
On 27.03.2012 11:23, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:56:05 AM Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:11:43PM +0200, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Monday, March 26, 2012 08:54:50 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 26.03.2012 20:36, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Monday, March 26, 20
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:56:05 AM Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:11:43PM +0200, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> > On Monday, March 26, 2012 08:54:50 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
> > > On 26.03.2012 20:36, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> > > > On Monday, March 26, 2012 07:52:49 PM Gleb Natapov wr
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:11:43PM +0200, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> On Monday, March 26, 2012 08:54:50 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
> > On 26.03.2012 20:36, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> > > On Monday, March 26, 2012 07:52:49 PM Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 07:46:03PM +0200, Vadim Rozenfe
On Monday, March 26, 2012 08:54:50 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 26.03.2012 20:36, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> > On Monday, March 26, 2012 07:52:49 PM Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 07:46:03PM +0200, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> >>> On Monday, March 26, 2012 07:00:32 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On Monday, March 26, 2012 07:00:32 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 22.03.2012 10:38, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> > On Thursday, March 22, 2012 10:52:42 AM Peter Lieven wrote:
> >> On 22.03.2012 09:48, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> >>> On Thursday, March 22, 2012 09:53:45 AM Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Wed, M
On 26.03.2012 20:36, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Monday, March 26, 2012 07:52:49 PM Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 07:46:03PM +0200, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Monday, March 26, 2012 07:00:32 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 22.03.2012 10:38, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Thursday, March 22, 2
On Monday, March 26, 2012 07:52:49 PM Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 07:46:03PM +0200, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> > On Monday, March 26, 2012 07:00:32 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
> > > On 22.03.2012 10:38, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, March 22, 2012 10:52:42 AM Peter Lieven w
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 07:46:03PM +0200, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> On Monday, March 26, 2012 07:00:32 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
> > On 22.03.2012 10:38, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> > > On Thursday, March 22, 2012 10:52:42 AM Peter Lieven wrote:
> > >> On 22.03.2012 09:48, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> > >>> O
On 22.03.2012 10:38, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Thursday, March 22, 2012 10:52:42 AM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 22.03.2012 09:48, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Thursday, March 22, 2012 09:53:45 AM Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 06:31:02PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 21.03.2012 12:10, Da
On Thursday, March 22, 2012 10:52:42 AM Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 22.03.2012 09:48, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> > On Thursday, March 22, 2012 09:53:45 AM Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 06:31:02PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> >>> On 21.03.2012 12:10, David Cure wrote:
> h
On 22.03.2012 09:48, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Thursday, March 22, 2012 09:53:45 AM Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 06:31:02PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 21.03.2012 12:10, David Cure wrote:
hello,
Le Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 02:38:22PM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
On 22.03.2012 09:33, David Cure wrote:
Le Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 09:53:45AM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
All true. I asked to try -hypervisor only to verify where we loose
performance. Since you get good result with it frequent access to PM
timer is probably the reason. I do not recommend using
On Thursday, March 22, 2012 09:53:45 AM Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 06:31:02PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> > On 21.03.2012 12:10, David Cure wrote:
> > > hello,
> > >
> > >Le Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 02:38:22PM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
> > >>Try to add to cpu
> > >>d
On 22.03.2012 09:31, David Cure wrote:
Le Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 06:31:02PM +0100, Peter Lieven ecrivait :
please keep in mind, that setting -hypervisor, disabling hpet and only
one vcpu
makes windows use tsc as clocksource. you have to make sure, that your vm
is not switching between physical soc
Le Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 06:31:02PM +0100, Peter Lieven ecrivait :
>
> please keep in mind, that setting -hypervisor, disabling hpet and only
> one vcpu
> makes windows use tsc as clocksource. you have to make sure, that your vm
> is not switching between physical sockets on your system and that y
hello,
Le Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 08:57:08AM +0100, Peter Lieven ecrivait :
>
> @avi, gleb: another option would be to revisit the old in-kernel
> pm-timer implementation
> and check if its feasible to use this as an alternative. it would also
> help non hyper-v aware
> systems (i
Le Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 09:53:45AM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
>
> All true. I asked to try -hypervisor only to verify where we loose
> performance. Since you get good result with it frequent access to PM
> timer is probably the reason. I do not recommend using -hypervisor for
> production!
On 22.03.2012 08:53, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 06:31:02PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 21.03.2012 12:10, David Cure wrote:
hello,
Le Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 02:38:22PM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
Try to add to cpu
definition in XML and check command line.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 06:31:02PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 21.03.2012 12:10, David Cure wrote:
> > hello,
> >
> >Le Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 02:38:22PM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
> >>Try to add to cpu
> >>definition in XML and check command line.
> > ok I try this but I can
On 21.03.2012 12:10, David Cure wrote:
hello,
Le Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 02:38:22PM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
Try to add to cpu
definition in XML and check command line.
ok I try this but I can't use to map the host cpu
(my libvirt is 0.9.8) so I use :
Opt
hello,
Le Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 02:38:22PM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
>
> Try to add to cpu
> definition in XML and check command line.
ok I try this but I can't use to map the host cpu
(my libvirt is 0.9.8) so I use :
Opteron_G3
(the physica
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:18:39PM +0100, David Cure wrote:
> Le Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:45:41AM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
> >
> > This is without -no-hpet :) Also I hope you are not measuring time while
>
> ha yes, sorry for the mistake.
>
> > tracing since it supposed to be slow
Le Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:45:41AM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
>
> This is without -no-hpet :) Also I hope you are not measuring time while
ha yes, sorry for the mistake.
> tracing since it supposed to be slower. Can you please try to run with
> -cpu host,-hypervisor and -no-hpet
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:32:20AM +0100, David Cure wrote:
> hello,
>
> Le Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:51:34PM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
> >
> > Can you run the same test on Linux guest and on Windows vm with 1 cpu?
> > I see a lot of IPIs between vcpus.
>
> I run the same s
hello,
Le Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:51:34PM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
>
> Can you run the same test on Linux guest and on Windows vm with 1 cpu?
> I see a lot of IPIs between vcpus.
I run the same slowly fonction (to remember the guest is
Windows2008R2 64bits). The repo
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 11:13:31AM +0100, David Cure wrote:
> hello,
>
> sorry for the delay,
>
> Le Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:38:07AM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
> >
> > Ah, I guess the reason is that it records events only of IO thread. You
> > need to trace all vcpu threa
hello,
sorry for the delay,
Le Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:38:07AM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
>
> Ah, I guess the reason is that it records events only of IO thread. You
> need to trace all vcpu threads too. Not sure trace-cmd allows more then
> one -P option though.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 05:33:56PM +0100, David Cure wrote:
> Le Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 11:13:15AM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
> >
> > > http://www.roullier.net/report-no-hpet.txt.gz
> > >
> > How have you acquired this trace? It does not trace all kvm events only
> > those that have "set_irq" i
To complete and because I see another thread on performance
trouble with w2008R2
Le Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 05:33:56PM +0100, David Cure ecrivait :
>
> > Nothing particularly strange here. ~1745 IRQs are injected into the
> > guest each second. RTC clock is configured to 1kH and other devic
Le Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 11:13:15AM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
>
> > http://www.roullier.net/report-no-hpet.txt.gz
> >
> How have you acquired this trace? It does not trace all kvm events only
> those that have "set_irq" in them.
I run : trace-cmd record -b 2 -e kvm -P
> Nothing
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 03:01:07PM +0100, David Cure wrote:
> Le Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:07:14PM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
> >
> > > > Can you do the trace again with -no-hpet on the command line?
> > >
> > > Is there a way to only trace events on specific VM ?
> > >
> > -P pid
>
>
Le Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 08:48:56AM -0500, Vadim Rozenfeld ecrivait :
>
> +1
> Try Microsoft Windows Performance Toolkit from Windows SDK
> http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?displaylang=en&id=3138
> It's really good.
I run xperf -on DiagEasy, and as I'm not an windows-er
Le Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:07:14PM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
>
> > > Can you do the trace again with -no-hpet on the command line?
> >
> > Is there a way to only trace events on specific VM ?
> >
> -P pid
ok. I take a trace of the VM with 1 user : start trace just
before to lau
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 09:59:39AM +0100, David Cure wrote:
> Le Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:01:26AM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
> >
> > Can you do the trace again with -no-hpet on the command line?
>
> Is there a way to only trace events on specific VM ?
>
-P pid
--
Le Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:01:26AM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
>
> Can you do the trace again with -no-hpet on the command line?
Is there a way to only trace events on specific VM ?
David.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a messa
Le Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 03:32:16PM +0200, Avi Kivity ecrivait :
>
> It's reading the HPET like crazy. There are also tons of interrupts.
> Please use the windows performance tools to see which devices trigger
> these interrupts.
>
> The HPET issue will be fixed by the hyper-V enlightenments, bu
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 09:55:53AM +0100, David Cure wrote:
> hello,
>
> Le Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 03:40:30PM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
> >
> > Try to add -no-hpet to qemu command line and see if it helps.
>
> I add this line in my xml definition for libvirt :
>
>
hello,
Le Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 03:40:30PM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
>
> Try to add -no-hpet to qemu command line and see if it helps.
I add this line in my xml definition for libvirt :
in the clock block. And I see
the -no-hpet in the command line :
/usr/b
- Original Message -
From: "Avi Kivity"
To: "David Cure"
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Vadim Rozenfeld"
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 3:32:16 PM
Subject: Re: performance trouble
On 02/10/2012 12:09 PM, David Cure wrote:
> hello,
>
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 03:32:16PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 02/10/2012 12:09 PM, David Cure wrote:
> > hello,
> >
> > Le Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 11:38:34AM +0200, Avi Kivity ecrivait :
> > >
> > > Please post a trace as documented in
> > > http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Tracing.
> >
On 02/10/2012 12:09 PM, David Cure wrote:
> hello,
>
> Le Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 11:38:34AM +0200, Avi Kivity ecrivait :
> >
> > Please post a trace as documented in http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Tracing.
>
> I made the trace : started just before the slow function launch
> and s
hello,
Le Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 11:38:34AM +0200, Avi Kivity ecrivait :
>
> Please post a trace as documented in http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Tracing.
I made the trace : started just before the slow function launch
and stoped just after. I start only one VM with 2 vcpus/1
On 02/03/2012 10:59 AM, David Cure wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Le Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 11:41:48AM +0100, David Cure ecrivait :
> >
> > For kvm_stats, I mean it's better to have only one VM with one
> > user for the test so I send this evening or tomorrow morning.
>
> I attach snaps
Hello,
Le Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 11:41:48AM +0100, David Cure ecrivait :
>
> For kvm_stats, I mean it's better to have only one VM with one
> user for the test so I send this evening or tomorrow morning.
I attach snapshot of the kvm_stat : the first one just before to
Hello,
Le Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 07:21:25PM +0200, Avi Kivity ecrivait :
>
> How many vcpus are there in total (over all guests)?
For test we run only 2 VM (RDS/TSE) with 2vcpus for each
> That's really strange. No network traffic/cpu/block I/O?
>
> What do 'vmstat 1' an
What's up with the cc list?
On 01/31/2012 07:15 PM, David Cure wrote:
> Le Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 07:21:20PM +0200, Avi Kivity ecrivait :
> >
> > Start with top and vmstat to see if the cpu or I/O are the bottleneck
>
> with top at the kvm layer, the VM take 50% of CPU (the physical
> box ha
Le Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 07:21:20PM +0200, Avi Kivity ecrivait :
>
> Start with top and vmstat to see if the cpu or I/O are the bottleneck
with top at the kvm layer, the VM take 50% of CPU (the physical
box have 16 real cores-not HT- : AMD Opteron 6134).
one result of vmstat :
pro
On 01/30/2012 06:51 PM, David Cure wrote:
> Le Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:20:34AM -0600, Brian Jackson ecrivait :
> >
> > Without more info or some way to reproduce the problem, it would be
> > pointless
> > for one of the devs to spend much time on it.
>
> yes for sure.
>
> But I mean
Le Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:20:34AM -0600, Brian Jackson ecrivait :
>
> Without more info or some way to reproduce the problem, it would be pointless
> for one of the devs to spend much time on it.
yes for sure.
But I mean there is some way to trace at the KVM level what happens
On Monday, January 30, 2012 09:36:55 AM David Cure wrote:
> Le Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 09:28:37AM +0100, David Cure ecrivait :
> > I use several kvm box, and no problem at all except for 1
> >
> > application that have bad response time.
> >
> > The VM runs Windows 2008R2 and the application
Le Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 09:28:37AM +0100, David Cure ecrivait :
>
> I use several kvm box, and no problem at all except for 1
> application that have bad response time.
>
> The VM runs Windows 2008R2 and the application is an
> client-server app develop with progress software and talk
Le Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 09:28:37AM +0100, David Cure ecrivait :
>
> I attach the libvirt xml of my vm.
I forget to attach ;)
David.
rds.xml
Description: XML document
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
73 matches
Mail list logo
