Hi Michael,
> Hi Razya,
> On the netperf benchmark, it looks like polling=10 gives a modest but
> measureable gain. So from that perspective it might be worth it if it's
> not too much code, though we'll need to spend more time checking the
> macro effect - we barely moved the needle on the macro
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 02:08:49PM +0200, Razya Ladelsky wrote:
> Razya Ladelsky/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL wrote on 29/10/2014 02:38:31 PM:
>
> > From: Razya Ladelsky/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL
> > To: m...@redhat.com
> > Cc: Razya Ladelsky/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL,
> > Eran Raichstein/Haifa/IBM@
Razya Ladelsky/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL wrote on 29/10/2014 02:38:31 PM:
> From: Razya Ladelsky/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL
> To: m...@redhat.com
> Cc: Razya Ladelsky/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL,
> Eran Raichstein/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, Yossi Kuperman1/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL,
> Joel Nider/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, abel.
>> > Hi Michael,
>> >
>> > Following the polling patch thread: http://marc.info/?
>> l=kvm&m=140853271510179&w=2,
>> > I changed poll_stop_idle to be counted in micro seconds, and carried
>out
>> > experiments using varying sizes of this value. The setup for
>> netperf consisted of
>> > 1 vm
"Zhang Haoyu" wrote on 30/10/2014 01:30:08 PM:
> From: "Zhang Haoyu"
> To: Razya Ladelsky/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, "mst"
> Cc: Razya Ladelsky/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, "kvm"
> Date: 30/10/2014 01:30 PM
> Subject: Re: Benchmarking for vhost polling patch
> Hi Michael,
>
> Following the polling patch thread:
> http://marc.info/?l=kvm&m=140853271510179&w=2,
> I changed poll_stop_idle to be counted in micro seconds, and carried out
> experiments using varying sizes of this value. The setup for netperf
> consisted of
> 1 vm and 1 vhost , each run
