On 12.12.2011 10:13, Avi Kivity wrote:
Old kernels don't expose KVM_VM_REGULAR, so if people follow the
recommendations, their userspace won't build. Normal guests must be 0.
We can pretend we planned this all along by making the argument a flags
mask, and claiming bit 0 for UCONTROL.
That's a
On 12/10/2011 02:35 PM, Carsten Otte wrote:
> This patch introduces a new config option for user controlled kernel
> virtual machines. It introduces an optional parameter to
> KVM_CREATE_VM in order to create a user controlled virtual machine.
> The parameter is passed to kvm_arch_init_vm for all a
On 09.12.2011 12:32, Alexander Graf wrote:
+KVM_CAP_UCONTROL
KVM_S390_CAP_UCONTROL
I'm happy either way. It seemed to me that the discussion between Avi
and Sasha for V2 of the patch series on this naming has concluded to
KVM_CAP_UCONTROL/KVM_VM_UCONTROL without _S390 in it.
KVM_ENABLE_CAP(
On 09.12.2011, at 12:23, Carsten Otte wrote:
> This patch introduces a new config option for user controlled kernel
> virtual machines. It introduces an optional parameter to
> KVM_CREATE_VM in order to create a user controlled virtual machine.
> The parameter is passed to kvm_arch_init_vm for al
