On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 15:09 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> What's the status here? Since there are core net changes, we'll need
> to
> see the final version soon if it's to appear in 2.6.39.
I am updating the patch and retesting it for the new kernel. I am trying
to understand why zero copy p
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 01:51:31AM -0800, Shirley Ma wrote:
> This patchset add supports for TX zero-copy between guest and host
> kernel through vhost. It significantly reduces CPU utilization on the
> local host on which the guest is located (It reduced 30-50% CPU usage
> for vhost thread for sin
This patch has built and tested against most recent linus git tree. But
I haven't done checkpatch yet. I would like to know whether this
approach is acceptable or not first.
Thanks
Shirley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger
