On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 12:21:05AM +, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> Gleb Natapov wrote on 2013-04-02:
> > On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 03:25:16AM +, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> >> Paolo Bonzini wrote on 2013-03-26:
> >>> Il 22/03/2013 06:24, Yang Zhang ha scritto:
> +static void rtc_irq_ack_eoi(struct
Gleb Natapov wrote on 2013-04-02:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 03:25:16AM +, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
>> Paolo Bonzini wrote on 2013-03-26:
>>> Il 22/03/2013 06:24, Yang Zhang ha scritto:
+static void rtc_irq_ack_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ struct rtc_status *rtc_status, in
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 03:25:16AM +, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> Paolo Bonzini wrote on 2013-03-26:
> > Il 22/03/2013 06:24, Yang Zhang ha scritto:
> >> +static void rtc_irq_ack_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >> + struct rtc_status *rtc_status, int irq)
> >> +{
> >> + if (irq != RTC
Paolo Bonzini wrote on 2013-03-29:
> Il 29/03/2013 04:25, Zhang, Yang Z ha scritto:
>> Paolo Bonzini wrote on 2013-03-26:
>>> Il 22/03/2013 06:24, Yang Zhang ha scritto:
+static void rtc_irq_ack_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ struct rtc_status *rtc_status, int irq)
+{
Il 29/03/2013 04:25, Zhang, Yang Z ha scritto:
> Paolo Bonzini wrote on 2013-03-26:
>> Il 22/03/2013 06:24, Yang Zhang ha scritto:
>>> +static void rtc_irq_ack_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>> + struct rtc_status *rtc_status, int irq)
>>> +{
>>> + if (irq != RTC_GSI)
>>> +
Paolo Bonzini wrote on 2013-03-26:
> Il 22/03/2013 06:24, Yang Zhang ha scritto:
>> +static void rtc_irq_ack_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> +struct rtc_status *rtc_status, int irq)
>> +{
>> +if (irq != RTC_GSI)
>> +return;
>> +
>> +if (test_and_clear_bit(vcpu-
Il 22/03/2013 09:54, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
> >>
>>> > > If userspace does not care about irq status it does not use IRQ_STATUS
>>> > > ioctl and we should not go extra mile to provide one. Not everyone cares
>>> > > about running Windows as a guest.
>> > I see your point. But if no windows
Il 22/03/2013 06:24, Yang Zhang ha scritto:
> +static void rtc_irq_ack_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + struct rtc_status *rtc_status, int irq)
> +{
> + if (irq != RTC_GSI)
> + return;
> +
> + if (test_and_clear_bit(vcpu->vcpu_id, rtc_status->dest_map))
> +
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:50:55AM +, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> Gleb Natapov wrote on 2013-03-22:
> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 08:51:47AM +, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> >> Gleb Natapov wrote on 2013-03-22:
> >>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 08:37:22AM +, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> Gleb Natapov wrote
Gleb Natapov wrote on 2013-03-22:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 08:51:47AM +, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
>> Gleb Natapov wrote on 2013-03-22:
>>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 08:37:22AM +, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
Gleb Natapov wrote on 2013-03-22:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 08:25:21AM +, Zhang, Ya
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 08:51:47AM +, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> Gleb Natapov wrote on 2013-03-22:
> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 08:37:22AM +, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> >> Gleb Natapov wrote on 2013-03-22:
> >>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 08:25:21AM +, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> Gleb Natapov wrote
Gleb Natapov wrote on 2013-03-22:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 08:37:22AM +, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
>> Gleb Natapov wrote on 2013-03-22:
>>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 08:25:21AM +, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
Gleb Natapov wrote on 2013-03-22:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 08:05:27AM +, Zhang, Ya
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 08:37:22AM +, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> Gleb Natapov wrote on 2013-03-22:
> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 08:25:21AM +, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> >> Gleb Natapov wrote on 2013-03-22:
> >>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 08:05:27AM +, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> Gleb Natapov wrote
Gleb Natapov wrote on 2013-03-22:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 08:25:21AM +, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
>> Gleb Natapov wrote on 2013-03-22:
>>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 08:05:27AM +, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
Gleb Natapov wrote on 2013-03-22:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 01:24:05PM +0800, Yang Zhan
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 08:25:21AM +, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> Gleb Natapov wrote on 2013-03-22:
> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 08:05:27AM +, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> >> Gleb Natapov wrote on 2013-03-22:
> >>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 01:24:05PM +0800, Yang Zhang wrote:
> From: Yang Zhang
> >
Gleb Natapov wrote on 2013-03-22:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 08:05:27AM +, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
>> Gleb Natapov wrote on 2013-03-22:
>>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 01:24:05PM +0800, Yang Zhang wrote:
From: Yang Zhang
Current interrupt coalescing logci which only used by RTC has con
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 08:05:27AM +, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> Gleb Natapov wrote on 2013-03-22:
> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 01:24:05PM +0800, Yang Zhang wrote:
> >> From: Yang Zhang
> >>
> >> Current interrupt coalescing logci which only used by RTC has conflict
> >> with Posted Interrupt.
> >
Gleb Natapov wrote on 2013-03-22:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 01:24:05PM +0800, Yang Zhang wrote:
>> From: Yang Zhang
>>
>> Current interrupt coalescing logci which only used by RTC has conflict
>> with Posted Interrupt.
>> This patch introduces a new mechinism to use eoi to track interrupt:
>> Whe
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 01:24:05PM +0800, Yang Zhang wrote:
> From: Yang Zhang
>
> Current interrupt coalescing logci which only used by RTC has conflict
> with Posted Interrupt.
> This patch introduces a new mechinism to use eoi to track interrupt:
> When delivering an interrupt to vcpu, the pen
19 matches
Mail list logo