Il 17/06/2014 17:35, Bandan Das ha scritto:
Well, I meant it more as a review and "suggested changes" to this patchset
Nadav posted, but yeah, if you prefer, I can post a change myself. I will
make a pass through other uses of BUG() in the code too.
I'd prefer that, there's no need to make Nada
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> Il 16/06/2014 19:38, Bandan Das ha scritto:
>> Nadav Amit writes:
>>
>>> The emulator does not emulate the xadd instruction correctly if the two
>>> operands are the same. In this (unlikely) situation the result should be
>>> the
>>> sum of X and X (2X) when it is curre
Il 16/06/2014 19:38, Bandan Das ha scritto:
Nadav Amit writes:
The emulator does not emulate the xadd instruction correctly if the two
operands are the same. In this (unlikely) situation the result should be the
sum of X and X (2X) when it is currently X. The solution is to first perform
wri
Nadav Amit writes:
> The emulator does not emulate the xadd instruction correctly if the two
> operands are the same. In this (unlikely) situation the result should be the
> sum of X and X (2X) when it is currently X. The solution is to first perform
> writeback to the source, before writing to
