On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 17:18 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> If there are no assigned devices, the guest PAT are not providing
> any useful information and can be overridden to writeback; VMX
> always does this because it has the "IPAT" bit in its extended
> page table entries, but SVM does not have a
On 07/07/2015 17:22, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> > -#define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_NONCOHERENT_DMA
>> > +#define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_VFIO_HOOKS
> Do we really want to tie these two things together under something
> that's not strictly a "vfio" option? Legacy assignment also makes use
> of these, as shown in
On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 15:45 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> If there are no assigned devices, the guest PAT are not providing
> any useful information and can be overridden to writeback; VMX
> always does this because it has the "IPAT" bit in its extended
> page table entries, but SVM does not have a
