> >
> > Our suggestion would be to use the maximum (a large enough) value,
> > so that vhost is polling 100% of the time.
> >
> > The polling optimization mainly addresses users who want to maximize
their
> > performance, even on the expense of wasting cpu cycles. The maximum
value
> > will pr
fa/IBM@IBMIL,
> > Yossi Kuperman1/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, Joel Nider/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL,
> > abel.gor...@gmail.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Eyal
> Moscovici/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL
> > Date: 12/01/2015 12:36 PM
> > Subject: Re: Fw: Benchmarking for vhost polling patch
> >
> &g
L,
> abel.gor...@gmail.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Eyal
Moscovici/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL
> Date: 12/01/2015 12:36 PM
> Subject: Re: Fw: Benchmarking for vhost polling patch
>
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 02:44:17PM +0200, Razya Ladelsky wrote:
> > > Hi Razya,
> > > Thanks for the updat
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 02:44:17PM +0200, Razya Ladelsky wrote:
> > Hi Razya,
> > Thanks for the update.
> > So that's reasonable I think, and I think it makes sense
> > to keep working on this in isolation - it's more
> > manageable at this size.
> >
> > The big questions in my mind:
> > - What h
> Hi Razya,
> Thanks for the update.
> So that's reasonable I think, and I think it makes sense
> to keep working on this in isolation - it's more
> manageable at this size.
>
> The big questions in my mind:
> - What happens if system is lightly loaded?
> E.g. a ping/pong benchmark. How much ext
Hi Razya,
Thanks for the update.
So that's reasonable I think, and I think it makes sense
to keep working on this in isolation - it's more
manageable at this size.
The big questions in my mind:
- What happens if system is lightly loaded?
E.g. a ping/pong benchmark. How much extra CPU are
we wa
Hi Michael,
Just a follow up on the polling patch numbers,..
Please let me know if you find these numbers satisfying enough to continue
with submitting this patch.
Otherwise - we'll have this patch submitted as part of the larger Elvis
patch set rather than independently.
Thank you,
Razya
-
