Hi Alex,Jan,
I put the hack of calling asssign_dev_msix_update() in mmio_msix_writel()
when the last verctor of msix is updated. Now msix interrupt allocation happens
as expected in the Host (Linux). But this is a ugly hack of hardcoding an
address since we don't know how many msix vectors are
Hi Alex,Jan,
I forgot mention that in case of MSI-X failure I do not see any
interrupts being allocated
by the Host (kvm module). grep kvm /proc/interrupts is empty.
-Shashidhar
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Shashidhar Patil
wrote:
> Hi Alex,Jan,
> I collected logs of pci updates p
Hi Alex,Jan,
I collected logs of pci updates processing of kvm(attached to this mail).
(I will try your suggestion soon)
The below source of Linux kernel shows the msix allocation done with
MSIX_ENABLE_FLAG
masked which works fine with kvm.
static int msix_capability_init(struct pci_dev *d
On 2012-01-13 22:56, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 22:33 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-01-13 22:05, Alex Williamson wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 22:00 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-01-04 04:21, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 19:49 +0530, Shashi
On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 22:33 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-01-13 22:05, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 22:00 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> On 2012-01-04 04:21, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 19:49 +0530, Shashidhar Patil wrote:
> Hi,
> I am
On 2012-01-13 22:05, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 22:00 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-01-04 04:21, Alex Williamson wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 19:49 +0530, Shashidhar Patil wrote:
Hi,
I am running Ubuntu 10.10 (amd64) on a 2 socket nehalem based
s
On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 22:00 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-01-04 04:21, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 19:49 +0530, Shashidhar Patil wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>I am running Ubuntu 10.10 (amd64) on a 2 socket nehalem based
> >> server with IOH 5520. 5520 supports VTD.
> >> I
On 2012-01-04 04:21, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 19:49 +0530, Shashidhar Patil wrote:
>> Hi,
>>I am running Ubuntu 10.10 (amd64) on a 2 socket nehalem based
>> server with IOH 5520. 5520 supports VTD.
>> I enabled DMAR with intel_iommu=on. The box has intel 82599 adapter
On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 12:25 +0530, Shashidhar Patil wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>Thanks for your help. Some answers and further investigation details
> inline.
>
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Alex Williamson
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 19:49 +0530, Shashidhar Patil wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 19:49 +0530, Shashidhar Patil wrote:
> Hi,
>I am running Ubuntu 10.10 (amd64) on a 2 socket nehalem based
> server with IOH 5520. 5520 supports VTD.
> I enabled DMAR with intel_iommu=on. The box has intel 82599 adapter
> which I assigned through VT-D to FreeBSD 8.2 ru
Hi,
I am running Ubuntu 10.10 (amd64) on a 2 socket nehalem based
server with IOH 5520. 5520 supports VTD.
I enabled DMAR with intel_iommu=on. The box has intel 82599 adapter
which I assigned through VT-D to FreeBSD 8.2 running
as guest os. The ixgbe driver detects the device and the driver
11 matches
Mail list logo
