On 06/21/2009 03:06 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 06/18/2009 03:39 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
Are you happy with the last version of the SSDT patch? I have more
piled up to go on top :-)
I don't want to use the word happy in acpi context, but the patch is
good and I applied it. Thanks.
Argh I know,
On 06/18/2009 03:39 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
On 06/16/2009 11:50 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Works for me with windows XP/7, but can you add a comment in DSDT where
_GRE.L02 should be why it is missing and where to find it.
Avi,
Are you happy with the last version of the SSDT patch? I have more
pi
On 06/16/2009 11:50 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Works for me with windows XP/7, but can you add a comment in DSDT where
_GRE.L02 should be why it is missing and where to find it.
Avi,
Are you happy with the last version of the SSDT patch? I have more
piled up to go on top :-)
Thanks,
Jes
--
To un
On 06/16/2009 11:50 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Works for me with windows XP/7, but can you add a comment in DSDT where
_GRE.L02 should be why it is missing and where to find it.
Sure, here's an updated version with the comment. Thanks for testing it.
Cheers,
Jes
Move _PR block from the DSDT to a
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 03:56:04PM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I figured out why Windows wasn't booting with the previous version
> of the patch. It seems it didn't like the forward declaration of the
> _PR.PRSC method.
>
> Instead I found that it does seem to work if I add the calling met
Hi,
I figured out why Windows wasn't booting with the previous version
of the patch. It seems it didn't like the forward declaration of the
_PR.PRSC method.
Instead I found that it does seem to work if I add the calling method
_GRE.L02 in the SSDT, while the rest of the _GRE is declared in the
D
